1 Deschler, B. & Lübbert, M. Acute myeloid leukemia: epidemiology and etiology. Cancer Interdiscip. Int. J. Am. Cancer Soc. 107, 2099–2107. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22233 (2006).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maksimovic, N. et al. Incidence and mortality patterns of Acute myeloid leukemia in Belgrade, Serbia (1999–2013). Med. 54, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54010005 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shallis, R. M., Wang, R., Davidoff, A., Ma, X. & Zeidan, A. M. Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia: recent progress and enduring challenges. Blood Rev. 36, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2019.04.005 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Southam, C. M., Craver, L. F., Dargeon, H. W. & Burchenal, J. H. A study of the natural history of acute leukemia with special reference to the duration of the disease and the occurrence of remissions. Cancer. 4, 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(195101)4 (1951). :1%3C39::AID-CNCR2820040105%3E3.0.CO;2-G.ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cheung, E. et al. The leukemia strikes back: a review of pathogenesis and treatment of secondary AML. Ann. Hematol. 98, 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0890 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Knapper, S. et al. A phase 2 trial of the FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib (CEP701) as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia not considered fit for intensive chemotherapy. Blood. 108, 3262–3270. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-04-015560 (2006).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Barreto, I. V. et al. Leukemic stem cell: a mini-review on clinical perspectives. Front. Oncol. 12, 931050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.931050 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Afessa, B. & Peters, S. G. in Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med.. 297–309 (Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc).Tettamanti, S., Pievani, A., Biondi, A., Dotti, G. & Serafini, M. Catch me if you can: how AML and its niche escape immunotherapy. Leuk. 36, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01350-x (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Arpinati, M. & Curti, A. Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Immunother. 6, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt.13.152 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Reilly, A. et al. Immunologic consequences of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 35, 46. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0b013e318266c0c8 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bochennek, K. et al. Infectious complications in children with acute myeloid leukemia: decreased mortality in multicenter trial AML-BFM 2004. Blood Cancer J. 6, e382–e382. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.110 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Khaldoyanidi, S., Nagorsen, D., Stein, A., Ossenkoppele, G. & Subklewe, M. Immune biology of acute myeloid leukemia: implications for immunotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 419. https://doi.org/10.1200%2FJCO.20.00475 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kabel, A., Zamzami, F., Al-Talhi, M., Al-Dwila, K. & Hamza, R. Acute myeloid leukemia: a focus on risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis and possible lines of management. Cancer Res. Treat. 5, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.12691/jcrt-5-2-4 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Le Dieu, R. et al. Peripheral blood T cells in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients at diagnosis have abnormal phenotype and genotype and form defective immune synapses with AML blasts. Blood. 114, 3909–3916. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-02-206946 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Santos, F. et al. Severe necrotizing stomatitis and osteomyelitis after chemotherapy for acute leukaemia. Aust Dent. J. 54, 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01129.x (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pimenta, D. B. et al. The bone marrow microenvironment mechanisms in acute myeloid leukemia. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 9, 764698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.764698 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Isidori, A. et al. The role of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia development and treatment. Expert Rev. Hematol. 7, 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474086.2014.958464 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, Y., Bewersdorf, J. P., Stahl, M. & Zeidan, A. M. Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: the dawn of a new era? Blood Rev. 34, 67–83 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gill, S. et al. Preclinical targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia and myeloablation using chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 123, 2343–2354. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-09-529537 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, Z., Lei, W., Wang, H., Liu, X. & Fu, R. Challenges and strategies associated with CAR-T cell therapy in blood malignancies. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 13, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00490-x (2024).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Frenay, J. et al. IL-1RAP, a key therapeutic target in cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 14918 (2022). https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/23/14918#ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
JärÃ¥s, M. et al. Isolation and killing of candidate chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells by antibody targeting of IL-1 receptor accessory protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 16280–16285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004408107 (2010).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Warda, W. et al. CML hematopoietic stem cells expressing IL1RAP can be targeted by chimeric antigen receptor–engineered T cells. Cancer Res. 79, 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1078 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ã…gerstam, H. et al. Antibodies targeting human IL1RAP (IL1R3) show therapeutic effects in xenograft models of acute myeloid leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 10786–10791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422749112 (2015).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhao, K. et al. IL1RAP as a surface marker for leukemia stem cells is related to clinical phase of chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 7, 4787 (2014).ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Trad, R. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells targeting IL-1RAP: a promising new cellular immunotherapy to treat acute myeloid leukemia. J. Immunother. Cancer 10 (2022).Zhang, Y. et al. IL1RAP-specific T cell engager depletes acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 17, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01586-x (2024).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sainson, R. C. et al. ADV101, a first-in-class IL-1RAP ADC demonstrates significant anti-tumor activity in solid tumor models. Cancer Res. 84, 2360–2360. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2024-2360 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wu, X. et al. Advances in drug delivery systems for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Small. 2403409 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202403409 (2024).Li, F. et al. Recent advances in material technology for leukemia treatments. Adv. Mater., 2313955 (2024).Sudo, K. et al. Human-derived fusogenic peptides for the intracellular delivery of proteins. J. Control Release. 255, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.398 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wadia, J. S., Stan, R. V. & Dowdy, S. F. Transducible TAT-HA fusogenic peptide enhances escape of TAT-fusion proteins after lipid raft macropinocytosis. Nat. Med. 10, 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm996 (2004).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kaplan, I. M., Wadia, J. S. & Dowdy, S. F. Cationic TAT peptide transduction domain enters cells by macropinocytosis. J. Control Release. 102, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.018 (2005).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nakase, I. et al. Cellular uptake of arginine-rich peptides: roles for macropinocytosis and actin rearrangement. Mol. Ther. 10, 1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.08.010 (2004).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lim, J. P. & Gleeson, P. A. Macropinocytosis: an endocytic pathway for internalising large gulps. Immunol. Cell. Biol. 89, 836–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2011.20 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maxfield, F. R. & Yamashiro, D. J. Endosome acidification and the pathways of receptor-mediated endocytosis. Immunobiol. Proteins pept. IV. 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5442-0_16 (1987).Huotari, J. & Helenius, A. Endosome maturation. EMBO j. 30, 3481–3500. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.286 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ahmad, A., Khan, J. M. & Haque, S. Strategies in the design of endosomolytic agents for facilitating endosomal escape in nanoparticles. Biochim. 160, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2019.02.012 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Varkouhi, A. K., Scholte, M., Storm, G. & Haisma, H. J. Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals. J. Control Release. 151, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.004 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lönn, P. et al. Enhancing endosomal escape for intracellular delivery of macromolecular biologic therapeutics. Sci. Rep. 6, 32301. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32301 (2016).Suzuki, M., Iwaki, K., Kikuchi, M., Fujiwara, K. & Doi, N. Characterization of the membrane penetration-enhancing peptide S19 derived from human syncytin-1 for the intracellular delivery of TAT-fused proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 586, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.065 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nakamura, M., Fujiwara, K. & Doi, N. Cytoplasmic delivery of siRNA using human-derived membrane penetration-enhancing peptide. J. Nanobiotechnol. 20, 458. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01667-4 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sørensen, H. P., Sperling-Petersen, H. U. & Mortensen, K. K. A favorable solubility partner for the recombinant expression of streptavidin. Protein Expr. Purif. 32, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2003.07.001 (2003).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Farokhi-Fard, A. et al. Bacterial production and biophysical characterization of a hard-to-fold scFv against myeloid leukemia cell surface marker, IL-1RAP. Mol. Biol. Rep. 50, 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07972-3 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jain, A. & Cheng, K. The principles and applications of avidin-based nanoparticles in drug delivery and diagnosis. J. Controlled Release. 245, 27–40 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rinne, J. et al. 188. Internalization of novel delivery vector TAT-streptavidin into human cells. Mol. Ther. 13, S73, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.08.212Kipriyanov, S. M. et al. Affinity enhancement of a recombinant antibody: formation of complexes with multiple valency by a single-chain fv fragment–core streptavidin fusion. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 9, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/9.2.203 (1996).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
López-Andarias, J. et al. Cell-penetrating streptavidin: a general tool for bifunctional delivery with spatiotemporal control, mediated by transport systems such as adaptive benzopolysulfane networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 4784–4792. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13621 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jain, A. & Cheng, K. The principles and applications of avidin-based nanoparticles in drug delivery and diagnosis. J. Control Release. 245, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.11.016 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cheal, S. M., Chung, S. K., Vaughn, B. A., Cheung, N. K. V. & Larson, S. M. Pretargeting: a path forward for radioimmunotherapy. J. Nucl. Med. 63, 1302–1315. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262186 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, W., Fletcher, D., van Heeckeren, R. C. & Davis, P. B. Non-covalent ligand conjugation to biotinylated DNA nanoparticles using TAT peptide genetically fused to monovalent streptavidin. J. Drug Target. 20, 678–690. https://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2012.712128 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Erazo-Oliveras, A., Muthukrishnan, N., Baker, R., Wang, T. Y. & Pellois, J. P. Improving the endosomal escape of cell-penetrating peptides and their cargos: strategies and challenges. Pharm. 5, 1177–1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph5111177 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Boado, R. J. et al. Genetic engineering, expression, and activity of a chimeric monoclonal antibody – avidin fusion protein for receptor-mediated delivery of biotinylated drugs in humans. Bioconjug. Chem. 19, 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc7004076 (2008).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhou, Q. H., Lu, J. Z., Hui, E. K. W., Boado, R. J. & Pardridge, W. M. Delivery of a peptide radiopharmaceutical to brain with an IgG-avidin fusion protein. Bioconjug. Chem. 22, 1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc200174x (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Demonte, D., Dundas, C. M. & Park, S. Expression and purification of soluble monomeric streptavidin in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 6285–6295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5682-y (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Trad, R. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells targeting IL-1RAP: a promising new cellular immunotherapy to treat acute myeloid leukemia. J. Immunother Cancer. 10 https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fjitc-2021-004222 (2022).Houtsma, R. et al. CombiFlow: combinatorial AML-specific plasma membrane expression profiles allow longitudinal tracking of clones. Blood Adv. 6, 2129–2143. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005018 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Barreyro, L. et al. Overexpression of IL-1 receptor accessory protein in stem and progenitor cells and outcome correlation in AML and MDS. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 120, 1290–1298. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-01-404699 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kim, J. W. et al. Cancer-associated molecular signature in the tissue samples of patients with cirrhosis. Hepatol. 39, 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20053 (2004).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, H. F. et al. Proteomic screens for suppressors of anoikis identify IL1RAP as a promising surface target in ewing sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 11, 2884–2903. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1690 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Y. et al. Innate immune mediator, Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP), is expressed and pro-tumorigenic in pancreatic cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 15, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01286-4 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jones, S. et al. Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Sci. 321, 1801–1806. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164368 (2008).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, F., Zhang, W., Wang, M. & Jia, P. IL1RAP regulated by PRPRD promotes gliomas progression via inducing neuronal synapse development and neuron differentiation in vitro. Pathol. Res. Pract. 216, 153141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2020.153141 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zheng, P. et al. Synthetic human monoclonal antibody targets hIL1 receptor accessory protein chain with therapeutic potential in triple-negative breast cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 107, 1064–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.099 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rydberg Millrud, C. et al. Blockade of IL-1α and IL-1β signaling by the anti-IL1RAP antibody nadunolimab (CAN04) mediates synergistic anti-tumor efficacy with chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 72, 667–678. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132612 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, F. et al. SRSF10-mediated IL1RAP alternative splicing regulates cervical cancer oncogenesis via mIL1RAP-NF-κB-CD47 axis. Oncogene. 37, 2394–2409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-017-0119-6 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lv, Q., Xia, Q., Li, A. & Wang, Z. The potential role of IL1RAP on tumor microenvironment-related inflammatory factors in stomach adenocarcinoma. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 20, 1533033821995282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533033821995282 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nakase, I. et al. Interaction of arginine-rich peptides with membrane-associated proteoglycans is crucial for induction of actin organization and macropinocytosis. Biochem. 46, 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0612824 (2007).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Suzuki, T. et al. Possible existence of common internalization mechanisms among arginine-rich peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 2437–2443. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110017200 (2002).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Baler, K. et al. Electrostatic unfolding and interactions of albumin driven by pH changes: a molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 118, 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp409936v (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Salama, M. M., Aborehab, N. M., Mahdy, E., Zayed, N. M., Ezzat, S. M. & A. & Nanotechnology in leukemia: diagnosis, efficient-targeted drug delivery, and clinical trials. Eur. J. Med. Res. 28, 566 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shen, J. et al. Advances of nanoparticles for leukemia treatment. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6, 6478–6489 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kim, Y. H. Heme oxygenase 1-targeted hybrid nanoparticle for chemo-and immuno-combination therapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202000487Ying-ping Jiang, J. Y. T. Holger Karsunky. Antibodies that bind membrane-bound il1rap. (Filing date: 2013-12-20).Lim, K. H., Huang, H., Pralle, A. & Park, S. Stable, high-affinity streptavidin monomer for protein labeling and monovalent biotin detection. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24605 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rahmati, S. et al. Computational engineering of protein L to achieve an optimal affinity chromatography resin for purification of antibody fragments. Anal. Chem. 93, 15253–15261. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01871 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rahmati, S. et al. Computational designing of the ligands of protein L affinity chromatography based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2268219 (2023).Heo, L., Park, H., Seok, C. & GalaxyRefine Protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W384–W388. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt458 (2013).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wiederstein, M. & Sippl, M. J. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm290 (2007). W407-W410.Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. Des. Select. 8, 127–134 (1995).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hebditch, M., Carballo-Amador, M. A., Charonis, S., Curtis, R. & Warwicker, J. Protein–Sol: a web tool for predicting protein solubility from sequence. Bioinform. 33, 3098–3100. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx345 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nguyen, M. N. et al. AllerCatPro 2.0: a web server for predicting protein allergenicity potential. Nucleic Acids res. 50, W36-W43. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac446 (2022).Jouybari, R. M., Sadeghi, A., Khansarinejad, B., Abbasian, S. S. & Abtahi, H. Production of recombinant streptavidin and optimization of refolding conditions for recovery of biological activity. Rep. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 6, 178 (2018).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Won, J. S., Kang, H. W., Nam, P. W. & Choe, M. H. B3 (Fab)-streptavidin tetramer has higher binding avidity than B3 (scFv)-streptavidin tetramer. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 30, 1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2009.30.5.1101 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sano, T., Smith, C. L. & Cantor, C. R. Expression and purification of recombinant streptavidin-containing chimeric proteins. Recomb Protein Protoc. : Detect. isol. 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-481-X:119 (1997).Won, J. S., Kang, H. W., Nam, P. W. & Choe, M. H. B3 (Fab)-streptavidin tetramer has higher binding avidity than B3 (scFv)-streptavidin tetramer. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 30, 1101–1106 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sørensen, H. P., Sperling-Petersen, H. U. & Mortensen, K. K. Dialysis strategies for protein refolding: preparative streptavidin production. Protein Expr. Purif. 31, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-5928(03)00133-5 (2003).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kamiloglu, S., Sari, G., Ozdal, T. & Capanoglu, E. Guidelines for cell viability assays. Food Front. 1, 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.44 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ