Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447, 661–678 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Barrett, J. C. & Cardon, L. R. Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 659–662 (2006).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
LaFramboise, T. Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays: a decade of biological, computational and technological advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 4181–4193 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hofker, M. H., Fu, J. & Wijmenga, C. The genome revolution and its role in understanding complex diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1842, 1889–1895 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sollis, E. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D977–D985 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wand, H. et al. Improving reporting standards for polygenic scores in risk prediction studies. Nature 591, 211–219 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ochoa, D. et al. The next-generation open targets platform: reimagined, redesigned, rebuilt. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1353–D1359 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yengo, L. et al. A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height. Nature 610, 704–712 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yengo, L. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ~700 000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 3641–3649 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhu, H. & Zhou, X. Statistical methods for SNP heritability estimation and partition: a review. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 1557–1568 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study. Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature 519, 223–228 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Manolio, T. A. et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461, 747–753 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yang, L. A practical guide for structural variation detection in the human genome. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 107, e103 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Taghizadeh, S. et al. Genome-wide identification of copy number variation and association with fat deposition in thin and fat-tailed sheep breeds. Sci. Rep. 12, 8834 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Delledonne, A. et al. Copy number variant scan in more than four thousand Holstein cows bred in Lombardy, Italy. PLoS ONE 19, e0303044 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of CNVs in 16,000 cases of eight common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 464, 713–720 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Verlouw, J. A. M. et al. A comparison of genotyping arrays. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 29, 1611–1624 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rapti, M. et al. CoverageMaster: comprehensive CNV detection and visualization from NGS short reads for genetic medicine applications. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac049 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tanjo, T., Kawai, Y., Tokunaga, K., Ogasawara, O. & Nagasaki, M. Practical guide for managing large-scale human genome data in research. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 39–52 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vacic, V. et al. Duplications of the neuropeptide receptor gene VIPR2 confer significant risk for schizophrenia. Nature 471, 499–503 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fitzgerald, T. & Birney, E. CNest: a novel copy number association discovery method uncovers 862 new associations from 200,629 whole-exome sequence datasets in the UK Biobank. Cell Genom. 2, 100167 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Montavon, T., Thevenet, L. & Duboule, D. Impact of copy number variations (CNVs) on long-range gene regulation at the HoxD locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20204–20211 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Conrad, D. F. & Hurles, M. E. The population genetics of structural variation. Nat. Genet. 39, S30–S36 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Conrad, D. F. et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464, 704–712 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, C. & Scherer, S. W. The clinical context of copy number variation in the human genome. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 12, e8 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lupski, J. R. Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease. Nat. Genet. 39, S43–S47 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Campbell, C. D. & Eichler, E. E. Properties and rates of germline mutations in humans. Trends Genet. 29, 575–584 (2013).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Belyeu, J. R. et al. De novo structural mutation rates and gamete-of-origin biases revealed through genome sequencing of 2,396 families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 108, 597–607 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gudmundsson, S. et al. Variant interpretation using population databases: lessons from gnomAD. Hum. Mutat. 43, 1012–1030 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, S. et al. A genomic mutational constraint map using variation in 76,156 human genomes. Nature 625, 92–100 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, F., Gu, W., Hurles, M. E. & Lupski, J. R. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 10, 451–481 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Redon, R. et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444–454 (2006).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wright, C. F. et al. Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. Lancet 385, 1305–1314 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Coutelier, M. et al. Combining callers improves the detection of copy number variants from whole-genome sequencing. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 178–186 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hollox, E. J., Zuccherato, L. W. & Tucci, S. Genome structural variation in human evolution. Trends Genet. 38, 45–58 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rossi, N. et al. Ethnic-specific association of amylase gene copy number with adiposity traits in a large Middle Eastern biobank. NPJ Genom. Med. 6, 8 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Perry, G. H. et al. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat. Genet. 39, 1256–1260 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Higuchi, R., Iwane, T., Iida, A. & Nakajima, K. Copy number variation of the salivary amylase gene and glucose metabolism in healthy young Japanese women. J. Clin. Med. Res. 12, 184–189 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rouleau, M. et al. Extensive metabolic consequences of human glycosyltransferase gene knockouts in prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 128, 285–296 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mafune, A. et al. Homozygous deletions of UGT2B17 modifies effects of smoking on TP53-mutations and relapse of head and neck carcinoma. BMC Cancer 15, 205 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Collins, R. L. et al. A cross-disorder dosage sensitivity map of the human genome. Cell 185, 3041–3055.e25 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Barra, V. & Fachinetti, D. The dark side of centromeres: types, causes and consequences of structural abnormalities implicating centromeric DNA. Nat. Commun. 9, 4340 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cook, C. B. et al. Somatic mosaicism detected by genome-wide sequencing in 500 parent–child trios with suspected genetic disease: clinical and genetic counseling implications. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 7, a006125 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Elrick, H. et al. SAVANA: reliable analysis of somatic structural variants and copy number aberrations in clinical samples using long-read sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.25.604944 (2024) .Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Thaxton, C. et al. Utilizing ClinGen gene-disease validity and dosage sensitivity curations to inform variant classification. Hum. Mutat. 43, 1031–1040 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huang, N., Lee, I., Marcotte, E. M. & Hurles, M. E. Characterising and predicting haploinsufficiency in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001154 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rice, A. M. & McLysaght, A. Dosage-sensitive genes in evolution and disease. BMC Biol. 15, 78 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
All of Us Research Program Genomics Investigators. Genomic data in the All of Us Research Program. Nature 627, 340–346 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Auwerx, C. et al. Rare copy-number variants as modulators of common disease susceptibility. Genome Med. 16, 5 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kirschner, R. et al. RPGR transcription studies in mouse and human tissues reveal a retina-specific isoform that is disrupted in a patient with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1571–1578 (1999).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shaikh, T. H. Copy number variation disorders. Curr. Genet. Med. Rep. 5, 183–190 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xu, H. H. et al. Familial 5.29 Mb deletion in chromosome Xq22.1-q22.3 with a normal phenotype: a rare pedigree and literature review. BMC Med. Genomics 16, 111 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Naseer, M. I. et al. Copy number variations in Saudi family with intellectual disability and epilepsy. BMC Genomics 17, 757 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wolstencroft, J. et al. Neuropsychiatric risk in children with intellectual disability of genetic origin: IMAGINE, a UK national cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 9, 715–724 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zarrei, M. et al. Gene copy number variation and pediatric mental health/neurodevelopment in a general population. Hum. Mol. Genet. 32, 2411–2421 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Auwerx, C. et al. The individual and global impact of copy-number variants on complex human traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet 109, 647–668 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ceyhan-Birsoy, O. et al. Next generation sequencing-based copy number analysis reveals low prevalence of deletions and duplications in 46 genes associated with genetic cardiomyopathies. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 4, 143–151 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Singer, E. S. et al. Characterization of clinically relevant copy-number variants from exomes of patients with inherited heart disease and unexplained sudden cardiac death. Genet. Med. 23, 86–93 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nfonsam, L. et al. ALU transposition induces familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 8, e951 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wilfert, A. B., Sulovari, A., Turner, T. N., Coe, B. P. & Eichler, E. E. Recurrent de novo mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders: properties and clinical implications. Genome Med 9, 101 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Malhotra, D. & Sebat, J. CNVs: harbingers of a rare variant revolution in psychiatric genetics. Cell 148, 1223–1241 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Marshall, C. R. et al. Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects. Nat. Genet. 49, 27–35 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Davies, R. W. et al. Using common genetic variation to examine phenotypic expression and risk prediction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat. Med. 26, 1912–1918 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maury, E. A. et al. Schizophrenia-associated somatic copy-number variants from 12,834 cases reveal recurrent NRXN1 and ABCB11 disruptions. Cell Genom. 3, 100356 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Trost, B. et al. Genomic architecture of autism from comprehensive whole-genome sequence annotation. Cell 185, 4409–4427.e18 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Riggs, E. R. et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet. Med. 22, 245–257 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hippman, C. & Nislow, C. Pharmacogenomic testing: clinical evidence and implementation challenges. J. Pers. Med. 9, 10 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Crews, K. R. et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for CYP2D6, OPRM1, and COMT genotypes and select opioid therapy. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 110, 888–896 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Twesigomwe, D. et al. Characterization of CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic variation in sub-Saharan African populations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 113, 643–659 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Twist, G. P. et al. Constellation: a tool for rapid, automated phenotype assignment of a highly polymorphic pharmacogene, CYP2D6, from whole-genome sequences. NPJ Genom. Med. 1, 15007 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, S. B. et al. Stargazer: a software tool for calling star alleles from next-generation sequencing data using CYP2D6 as a model. Genet. Med. 21, 361–372 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, X. et al. Cyrius: accurate CYP2D6 genotyping using whole-genome sequencing data. Pharmacogenomics J. 21, 251–261 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Twesigomwe, D. et al. StellarPGx: a nextflow pipeline for calling star alleles in cytochrome P450 genes. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 110, 741–749 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cavallari, L. H. & Johnson, J. A. A case for genotype-guided pain management. Pharmacogenomics 20, 705–708 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tayeh, M. K. et al. Clinical pharmacogenomic testing and reporting: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet. Med. 24, 759–768 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Singh, A. K. et al. Detecting copy number variation in next generation sequencing data from diagnostic gene panels. BMC Med. Genomics 14, 214 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, K. et al. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data. Genome Res. 17, 1665–1674 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Behera, S. et al. Comprehensive and accurate genome analysis at scale using DRAGEN accelerated algorithms. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.02.573821 (2024).Hujoel, M. L. A. et al. Influences of rare copy-number variation on human complex traits. Cell 185, 4233–4248.e27 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gabrielaite, M. et al. A comparison of tools for copy-number variation detection in germline whole exome and whole genome sequencing data. Cancers 13, 6283 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Uffelmann, E. et al. Genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 1, 60 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Collins, R. L. et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics. Nature 581, 444–451 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gross, A. M. et al. Copy-number variants in clinical genome sequencing: deployment and interpretation for rare and undiagnosed disease. Genet. Med. 21, 1121–1130 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mbatchou, J. et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat. Genet 53, 1097–1103 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Romdhane, L. et al. Ethnic and functional differentiation of copy number polymorphisms in Tunisian and HapMap population unveils insights on genome organizational plasticity. Sci. Rep. 14, 4654 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fadista, J., Manning, A. K., Florez, J. C. & Groop, L. The (in)famous GWAS P-value threshold revisited and updated for low-frequency variants. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24, 1202–1205 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kaler, A. S. & Purcell, L. C. Estimation of a significance threshold for genome-wide association studies. BMC Genomics 20, 618 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Null, M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of copy number variants and normal facial variation in a large cohort of Bantu Africans. HGG Adv. 3, 100082 (2022).
Google ScholarÂ
Hujoel, M. L. A. et al. Hidden protein-altering variants influence diverse human phenotypes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.07.544066 (2023).Li, S., Carss, K. J., Halldorsson, B. V. & Cortes, A. UK biobank whole-genome sequencing consortium. whole-genome sequencing of half-a-million UK biobank participants. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.06.23299426 (2023).Halldorsson, B. V. et al. The sequences of 150,119 genomes in the UK Biobank. Nature 607, 732–740 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Beyter, D. et al. Long-read sequencing of 3,622 Icelanders provides insight into the role of structural variants in human diseases and other traits. Nat. Genet. 53, 779–786 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Eggertsson, H. P. et al. GraphTyper2 enables population-scale genotyping of structural variation using pangenome graphs. Nat. Commun. 10, 5402 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Backman, J. D. et al. Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants. Nature 599, 628–634 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, Q. et al. Rare variant contribution to human disease in 281,104 UK Biobank exomes. Nature 597, 527–532 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, Y. R. et al. Rare copy number variants in over 100,000 European ancestry subjects reveal multiple disease associations. Nat. Commun. 11, 255 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Aguirre, M., Rivas, M. A. & Priest, J. Phenome-wide burden of copy-number variation in the UK biobank. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 373–383 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Babadi, M. et al. GATK-gCNV enables the discovery of rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 55, 1589–1597 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wu, M. C. et al. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 82–93 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhan, X., Girirajan, S., Zhao, N., Wu, M. C. & Ghosh, D. A novel copy number variants kernel association test with application to autism spectrum disorders studies. Bioinformatics 32, 3603–3610 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dougherty, M. L. et al. Transcriptional fates of human-specific segmental duplications in brain. Genome Res. 28, 1566–1576 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Egorova, T. V. et al. In-frame deletion of dystrophin exons 8–50 results in DMD phenotype. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 9117 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schmitz, D. et al. Copy number variations and their effect on the plasma proteome. Genetics 225, iyad179 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
de Los Campos, G., Grueneberg, A., Funkhouser, S., Pérez-RodrÃguez, P. & Samaddar, A. Fine mapping and accurate prediction of complex traits using Bayesian Variable Selection models applied to biobank-size data. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 31, 313–320 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Broekema, R. V., Bakker, O. B. & Jonkers, I. H. A practical view of fine-mapping and gene prioritization in the post-genome-wide association era. Open Biol. 10, 190221 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, C., Cerveira, E., Rens, W. & Lee, C. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches for simultaneous analysis of the entire human genome. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 99, e70 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gribble, S. M., Ng, B. L., Prigmore, E., Fitzgerald, T. & Carter, N. P. Array painting: a protocol for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1722–1736 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mantere, T. et al. Optical genome mapping enables constitutional chromosomal aberration detection. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 108, 1409–1422 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schrauwen, I. et al. Optical genome mapping unveils hidden structural variants in neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci. Rep. 14, 11239 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Louzada, S. & Yang, F. in Cancer Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics (eds. Ye, J. C. & Heng, H. H.) 185–203. Methods in Molecular Biology series vol. 2825 (Springer, 2024).Choi, J. et al. A whole-genome reference panel of 14,393 individuals for East Asian populations accelerates discovery of rare functional variants. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg6319 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lepamets, M. et al. Omics-informed CNV calls reduce false-positive rates and improve power for CNV-trait associations. HGG Adv. 3, 100133 (2022).
Google ScholarÂ
Hujoel, M. L. A. et al. Protein-altering variants at copy number-variable regions influence diverse human phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 56, 569–578 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gordeeva, V. et al. Benchmarking germline CNV calling tools from exome sequencing data. Sci. Rep. 11, 14416 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhou, Z., Wang, W., Wang, L. S. & Zhang, N. R. Integrative DNA copy number detection and genotyping from sequencing and array-based platforms. Bioinformatics 34, 2349–2355 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Montanucci, L. et al. Genome-wide identification and phenotypic characterization of seizure-associated copy number variations in 741,075 individuals. Nat. Commun. 14, 4392 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Owen, D. et al. Effects of pathogenic CNVs on physical traits in participants of the UK Biobank. BMC Genomics 19, 867 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fawcett, K. A. et al. Exome-wide analysis of copy number variation shows association of the human leukocyte antigen region with asthma in UK Biobank. BMC Med. Genomics 15, 119 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, J. et al. The coexistence of copy number variations (CNVs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at a locus can result in distorted calculations of the significance in associating SNPs to disease. Hum. Genet. 137, 553–567 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wineinger, N. E., Pajewski, N. M. & Tiwari, H. K. A method to assess linkage disequilibrium between CNVs and SNPs inside copy number variable regions. Front. Genet. 2, 17 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Estivill, X. & Armengol, L. Copy number variants and common disorders: filling the gaps and exploring complexity in genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 3, 1787–1799 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Morales, J. et al. A standardized framework for representation of ancestry data in genomics studies, with application to the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog. Genome Biol. 19, 21 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hayhurst, J. et al. A community driven GWAS summary statistics standard. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.15.500230 (2022).Magno, R. & Maia, A. T. gwasrapidd: an R package to query, download and wrangle GWAS catalog data. Bioinformatics 36, 649–650 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cao, T., Li, A. & Huang, Y. pandasGWAS: a Python package for easy retrieval of GWAS catalog data. BMC Genomics 24, 238 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Elsworth, B. et al. The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructure. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.10.244293 (2020).Costanzo, M. C. et al. Cardiovascular disease knowledge portal: a community resource for cardiovascular disease research. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 16, e004181 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lambert, S. A. et al. The polygenic score catalog: new functionality and tools to enable FAIR research. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.29.24307783 (2024).Chen, Y. et al. Deciphering the exact breakpoints of structural variations using long sequencing reads with DeBreak. Nat. Commun. 14, 283 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Smolka, M. et al. Detection of mosaic and population-level structural variants with Sniffles2. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02024-y (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dierckxsens, N., Li, T., Vermeesch, J. R. & Xie, Z. A benchmark of structural variation detection by long reads through a realistic simulated model. Genome Biol. 22, 342 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jiang, T. et al. Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV. Genome Biol. 21, 189 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Amarasinghe, S. L. et al. Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis. Genome Biol. 21, 30 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
De Coster, W., Weissensteiner, M. H. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 572–587 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gustafson, J. A. et al. Nanopore sequencing of 1000 genomes project samples to build a comprehensive catalog of human genetic variation. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303792 (2024).Schloissnig, S. et al. Long-read sequencing and structural variant characterization in 1,019 samples from the 1000 genomes project. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.18.590093 (2024).Groza, C. et al. Pangenome graphs improve the analysis of structural variants in rare genetic diseases. Nat. Commun. 15, 657 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ebler, J. et al. Pangenome-based genome inference allows efficient and accurate genotyping across a wide spectrum of variant classes. Nat. Genet. 54, 518–525 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Noyvert, B. et al. Imputation of structural variants using a multi-ancestry long-read sequencing panel enables identification of disease associations. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.20.23300308 (2023).Lambert, S. A. et al. The polygenic score catalog as an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation. Nat. Genet. 53, 420–425 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xiang, R. et al. Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools. Genome Med. 16, 33 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hao, L. et al. Development of a clinical polygenic risk score assay and reporting workflow. Nat. Med. 28, 1006–1013 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lennon, N. J. et al. Selection, optimization and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse US populations. Nat. Med. 30, 480–487 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bergen et al. Joint contributions of rare copy number variants and common SNPs to risk for schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 176, 29–35 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Taniguchi, S. et al. Polygenic risk scores in schizophrenia with clinically significant copy number variants. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 74, 35–39 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mollon, J. et al. Impact of copy number variants and polygenic risk scores on psychopathology in the UK biobank. Biol. Psychiatry 94, 591–600 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alexander-Bloch, A. et al. Copy number variant risk scores associated with cognition, psychopathology, and brain structure in youths in the philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. JAMA Psychiatry 79, 699–709 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Saarentaus, E. C. et al. Polygenic burden has broader impact on health, cognition, and socioeconomic outcomes than most rare and high-risk copy number variants. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 4884–4895 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kachuri, L. et al. Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 8–25 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, S. et al. Leveraging fine-scale population structure reveals conservation in genetic effect sizes between human populations across a range of human phenotypes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.08.552281 (2023).Hou, K. et al. Causal effects on complex traits are similar for common variants across segments of different continental ancestries within admixed individuals. Nat. Genet. 55, 549–558 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Heyne, H. O. et al. Mono- and biallelic variant effects on disease at biobank scale. Nature 613, 519–525 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Song, P. et al. Data resource profile: understanding the patterns and determinants of health in South Asians-the South Asia biobank. Int. J. Epidemiol. 50, 717–718e (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Browning, S. R. & Browning, B. L. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 1084–1097 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Loh, P. R. et al. Reference-based phasing using the haplotype reference consortium panel. Nat. Genet. 48, 1443–1448 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Delaneau, O., Zagury, J. F., Robinson, M. R., Marchini, J. L. & Dermitzakis, E. T. Accurate, scalable and integrative haplotype estimation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5436 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hofmeister, R. J., Ribeiro, D. M., Rubinacci, S. & Delaneau, O. Accurate rare variant phasing of whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data in the UK Biobank. Nat. Genet. 55, 1243–1249 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Browning, B. L. & Browning, S. R. Statistical phasing of 150,119 sequenced genomes in the UK Biobank. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 161–165 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lassen, F. H. et al. Exome-wide evidence of compound heterozygous effects across common phenotypes in the UK Biobank. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.29.23291992 (2023).Mountjoy, E. et al. An open approach to systematically prioritize causal variants and genes at all published human GWAS trait-associated loci. Nat. Genet. 53, 1527–1533 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Giambartolomei, C. et al. Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004383 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Abdellaoui, A., Yengo, L., Verweij, K. J. H. & Visscher, P. M. 15 years of GWAS discovery: realizing the promise. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 179–194 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Namba, S. et al. A practical guideline of genomics-driven drug discovery in the era of global biobank meta-analysis. Cell Genom. 2, 100190 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Klein, R. J. et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308, 385–389 (2005).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Arruda, A. L., Morris, A. P. & Zeggini, E. Advancing equity in human genomics through tissue-specific multi-ancestry molecular data. Cell Genom. 4, 100485 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ