Rocher, L., Hendrickx, J. M. & de Montjoye, Y.-A. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat. Commun. 10, 3069 (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fox, P. T., Parsons, L. M. & Lancaster, J. L. Beyond the single study: function/location metanalysis in cognitive neuroimaging. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 178–187 (1998).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Neu, S. C., Crawford, K. L. & Toga, A. W. The image and data archive at the laboratory of neuro imaging. Front. Neuroinform. 17, 1173623 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jack, C. R. Jr et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27, 685–691 (2008).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Peet, B. T., Spina, S., Mundada, N. & La Joie, R. Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Dementia: Heterogeneity and Relationships with Underlying Neuropathology. Neurotherapeutics 18, 728–752 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Elam, J. S. et al. The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective. Neuroimage 244, 118543 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Katan, M. & Luft, A. Global Burden of Stroke. Semin. Neurol. 38, 208–211 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alberts, M. J. et al. Revised and updated recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers: a summary statement from the brain attack coalition. Stroke 42, 2651–2665 (2011).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rorden, C. & Karnath, H.-O. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 813–819 (2004).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wilmskoetter, J. et al. Mapping acute lesion locations to physiological swallow impairments after stroke. Neuroimage Clin 22, 101685 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Karnath, H.-O., Sperber, C. & Rorden, C. Mapping human brain lesions and their functional consequences. Neuroimage 165, 180–189 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yourganov, G., Fridriksson, J., Rorden, C., Gleichgerrcht, E. & Bonilha, L. Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech. J. Neurosci. 36, 6668–6679 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kristinsson, S. et al. Brain age predicts long-term recovery in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Commun 4, fcac252 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Markiewicz, C. J. et al. The OpenNeuro resource for sharing of neuroscience data. Elife 10 (2021).Gorgolewski, K. J. et al. The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Sci Data 3, 160044 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kennedy, D. N. et al. Everything Matters: The ReproNim Perspective on Reproducible Neuroimaging. Front. Neuroinform. 13, 1 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hayashi, S. et al. brainlife.io: A decentralized and open source cloud platform to support neuroscience research. ArXiv (2023).Martin, D. et al. Enhancing Collaborative Neuroimaging Research: Introducing COINSTAC Vaults for Federated Analysis and Reproducibility. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.08.539852 (2023).Renton, A. I. et al. Neurodesk: an accessible, flexible and portable data analysis environment for reproducible neuroimaging. Nat Methods 21, 804-808 (2024).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liew, S.-L. et al. A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms. Sci Data 9, 320 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liew, S.-L. et al. The ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group: Big data neuroimaging to study brain-behavior relationships after stroke. Hum. Brain Mapp. 43, 129–148 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chilamkurthy, S. et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet 392, 2388–2396 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hernandez Petzsche, M. R. et al. ISLES 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset. Sci Data 9, 762 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Koç, U. et al. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Competition (TEKNOFEST-2021): Stroke Data Set. Eurasian J Med 54, 248–258 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Faria, A. V. Annotated Clinical MRIs and Linked Metadata of Patients with Acute Stroke, Baltimore, Maryland, 2009–2019. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38464.v5 (2022).Liu, C.-F. et al. Deep learning-based detection and segmentation of diffusion abnormalities in acute ischemic stroke. Commun. Med. 1, 61 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xiong, Y., Khlif, M. S., Egorova-Brumley, N., Brodtmann, A. & Stark, B. C. Neural correlates of verbal fluency revealed by longitudinal T1, T2 and FLAIR imaging in stroke. Neuroimage Clin 38, 103406 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Brodtmann, A. et al. Charting cognitive and volumetric trajectories after stroke: protocol for the Cognition And Neocortical Volume After Stroke (CANVAS) study. Int. J. Stroke 9, 824–828 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rannikmäe, K. et al. Accuracy of identifying incident stroke cases from linked health care data in UK Biobank. Neurology 95, e697–e707 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Seghier, M. L. et al. The PLORAS Database: A data repository for Predicting Language Outcome and Recovery After Stroke. Neuroimage 124, 1208–1212 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Griffis, J. C., Metcalf, N. V., Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Lesion Quantification Toolkit: A MATLAB software tool for estimating grey matter damage and white matter disconnections in patients with focal brain lesions. Neuroimage Clin 30, 102639 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Seghier, M. L., Ramsden, S., Lim, L., Leff, A. P. & Price, C. J. Gradual lesion expansion and brain shrinkage years after stroke. Stroke 45, 877–879 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Busby, N. et al. Advanced Brain Age and Chronic Poststroke Aphasia Severity. Neurology 100, e1166–e1176 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kopal, J., Uddin, L. Q. & Bzdok, D. The end game: respecting major sources of population diversity. Nat. Methods 20, 1122–1128 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rorden, C., Bonilha, L., Fridriksson, J., Bender, B. & Karnath, H.-O. Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization. Neuroimage 61, 957–965 (2012).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bradford, L., Aboy, M. & Liddell, K. International transfers of health data between the EU and USA: a sector-specific approach for the USA to ensure an ‘adequate’ level of protection. J Law Biosci 7, lsaa055 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tucker, K. et al. Protecting patient privacy when sharing patient-level data from clinical trials. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 16(Suppl 1), 77 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Theyers, A. E. et al. Multisite Comparison of MRI Defacing Software Across Multiple Cohorts. Front. Psychiatry 12, 617997 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gao, C., Landman, B. A., Prince, J. L. & Carass, A. A reproducibility evaluation of the effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.15.23289995 (2023).Cali, R. J. et al. The Influence of Brain MRI Defacing Algorithms on Brain-Age Predictions via 3D Convolutional Neural Networks. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.28.538724 (2023).Schwarz, C. G. et al. Changing the face of neuroimaging research: Comparing a new MRI de-facing technique with popular alternatives. Neuroimage 231, 117845 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kho, M. E., Duffett, M., Willison, D. J., Cook, D. J. & Brouwers, M. C. Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic review. BMJ 338, b866 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Plis, S. M. et al. COINSTAC: A Privacy Enabled Model and Prototype for Leveraging and Processing Decentralized Brain Imaging Data. Front. Neurosci. 10, 365 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pedersen, P. M., Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O. & Olsen, T. S. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann. Neurol. 38, 659–666 (1995).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) Collaborators. Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Stroke 52, 1778–1787 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fridriksson, J. Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke. J. Neurosci. 30, 11558–11564 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kristinsson, S. et al. Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke. Brain Commun 3, fcab174 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Johnson, L. et al. Functional Connectivity and Speech Entrainment Speech Entrainment Improves Connectivity Between Anterior and Posterior Cortical Speech Areas in Non-fluent Aphasia. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 36, 164–174 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fridriksson, J. et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 75, 1470–1476 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kertesz, A. The Western Aphasia Battery: a systematic review of research and clinical applications. Aphasiology https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1852002 (2022).Kertesz, A. The Western Aphasia Battery: Test Booklet. (1982).Kertesz, A. Western Aphasia Battery–Revised. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15168-000 (2006).Yourganov, G., Smith, K. G., Fridriksson, J. & Rorden, C. Predicting aphasia type from brain damage measured with structural MRI. Cortex 73, 203–215 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
McKinnon, E. T. et al. Structural plasticity of the ventral stream and aphasia recovery. Ann. Neurol. 82, 147–151 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gleichgerrcht, E., Fridriksson, J., Rorden, C. & Bonilha, L. Connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping (CLSM): A novel approach to map neurological function. Neuroimage Clin 16, 461–467 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yourganov, G., Fridriksson, J., Stark, B. & Rorden, C. Removal of artifacts from resting-state fMRI data in stroke. Neuroimage Clin 17, 297–305 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, C.-F. et al. Digital 3D Brain MRI Arterial Territories Atlas. Sci Data 10, 74 (2023).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sperber, C. & Karnath, H.-O. Impact of correction factors in human brain lesion-behavior inference. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 1692–1701 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Johnson, L. et al. Predictors beyond the lesion: Health and demographic factors associated with aphasia severity. Cortex 154, 375–389 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sperber, C., Gallucci, L., Mirman, D., Arnold, M. & Umarova, R. M. Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models. Neuroimage Clin 40, 103511 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gibson, M. et al. Aphasia Recovery Cohort (ARC) Dataset. OpenNeuro. https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds004884.v1.0.1 (2023).Li, X., Morgan, P. S., Ashburner, J., Smith, J. & Rorden, C. The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion. J. Neurosci. Methods 264, 47–56 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–851 (2005).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Johnson, L. et al. Progression of Aphasia Severity in the Chronic Stages of Stroke. Am. J. Speech. Lang. Pathol. 28, 639–649 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ