Wetmore, K. M. et al. Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. MBio 6, e00306–15 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Moore, L. R. & Chisholm, S. W. Photophysiology of the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus: Ecotypic differences among cultured isolates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 628–638 (1999).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, J. et al. One carbon metabolism in SAR11 pelagic marine bacteria. PLoS One 6, e23973 (2011).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
González, J. M. et al. Genome analysis of the proteorhodopsin-containing marine bacterium Polaribacter sp. MED152 (Flavobacteria). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8724–8729 (2008).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Leonelli, S. Model Organism. in Encyclopedia of Systems Biology (eds. Dubitzky, W., Wolkenhauer, O., Cho, K.-H. & Yokota, H.) 1398–1401 (Springer New York, 2013).Eren, A. M. et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat Microbiol 6, 3–6 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Newton, R. J. et al. Genome characteristics of a generalist marine bacterial lineage. ISME J. 4, 784–798 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Munson-McGee, J. H. et al. Decoupling of respiration rates and abundance in marine prokaryoplankton. Nature 612, 764–770 (2022).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fu, H., Uchimiya, M., Gore, J. & Moran, M. A. Ecological drivers of bacterial community assembly in synthetic phycospheres. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3656–3662 (2020).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nowinski, B. & Moran, M. A. Niche dimensions of a marine bacterium are identified using invasion studies in coastal seawater. Nat Microbiol 6, 524–532 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schreier, J. E., Smith, C. B., Ioerger, T. R. & Moran, M. A. A mutant fitness assay identifies bacterial interactions in a model ocean hot spot. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2217200120 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Howard, E. C. et al. Bacterial taxa that limit sulfur flux from the ocean. Science 314, 649–652 (2006).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mejia, C. et al. An arrayed transposon library of Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3. bioRxiv 2022.09.11.507510, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.11.507510 (2022).Moran, M. A. et al. Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature 432, 910–913 (2004).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rivers, A. R., Smith, C. B. & Moran, M. A. An updated genome annotation for the model marine bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3. Stand. Genomic Sci. 9, 11 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Galperin, M. Y. et al. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D274–D281 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412–D419 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36, 2251–2252 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Christie-Oleza, J. A., Miotello, G. & Armengaud, J. High-throughput proteogenomics of Ruegeria pomeroyi: seeding a better genomic annotation for the whole marine Roseobacter clade. BMC Genomics 13, 73 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bullock, H. A., Reisch, C. R., Burns, A. S., Moran, M. A. & Whitman, W. B. Regulatory and functional diversity of methylmercaptopropionate coenzyme A ligases from the dimethylsulfoniopropionate demethylation pathway in Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 and other proteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1275–1285 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cunliffe, M. Purine catabolic pathway revealed by transcriptomics in the model marine bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92 (2016).Sharpe, G. C., Gifford, S. M. & Septer, A. N. A model Roseobacter, Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, employs a diffusible killing mechanism to eliminate competitors. mSystems 5 (2020).Veseli, I. & Cooper, Z. Ruegeria pomeroyi digital microbe databases. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7439166 (2022).Schroer, W. F. et al. Functional annotation and importance of marine bacterial transporters of plankton exometabolites. ISME Communications 3, 1–10 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Landa, M., Burns, A. S., Roth, S. J. & Moran, M. A. Bacterial transcriptome remodeling during sequential co-culture with a marine dinoflagellate and diatom. ISME J. 11, 2677–2690 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ferrer-González, F. X. et al. Bacterial transcriptional response to labile exometabolites from photosynthetic picoeukaryote Micromonas commoda. ISME Commun 3, 5 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ferrer-González, F. X. et al. Resource partitioning of phytoplankton metabolites that support bacterial heterotrophy. ISME J. 15, 762–773 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Olofsson, M. et al. Growth-stage-related shifts in diatom endometabolome composition set the stage for bacterial heterotrophy. ISME Communications 2, 1–9 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gralka, M., Pollak, S. & Cordero, O. X. Genome content predicts the carbon catabolic preferences of heterotrophic bacteria. Nat Microbiol 8, 1799–1808 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Forchielli, E., Sher, D. & Segrè, D. Metabolic phenotyping of marine heterotrophs on refactored media reveals diverse metabolic adaptations and lifestyle strategies. mSystems 7, e0007022 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cooper, Z. S. et al. Normalized protein abundance data and protein annotations for proteomic data from laboratory cultures of Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 and Alteromonas macleodii MIT1002 in 2022. https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.927507.1 (2024).Cooper, Z. S., Gray, L., Rauch, S. & Moran, M. A. Metadata for transcriptomic expression data from cultures of Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 and Alteromonas macleodii MIT1002 grown in defined culture media with either glucose, acetate, or a mix of both as carbon substrates. https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.916134.1 (2023).Hennon, G. M. M. et al. The impact of elevated CO2 on Prochlorococcus and microbial interactions with ‘helper’ bacterium Alteromonas. ISME J. 12, 520–531 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
López-Pérez, M. et al. Genomes of surface isolates of Alteromonas macleodii: the life of a widespread marine opportunistic copiotroph. Sci. Rep. 2, 696 (2012).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
HenrÃquez-Castillo, C. et al. Metaomics unveils the contribution of Alteromonas bacteria to carbon cycling in marine oxygen minimum zones. Frontiers in Marine Science 9 (2022).Mikhailov, V. V., Romanenko, L. A. & Ivanova, E. P. The genus Alteromonas and related Proteobacteria. in The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria Volume 6: Proteobacteria: Gamma Subclass (eds. Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, K.-H. & Stackebrandt, E.) 597–645 (Springer New York, 2006).Koch, H. et al. Biphasic cellular adaptations and ecological implications of Alteromonas macleodii degrading a mixture of algal polysaccharides. ISME J. 13, 92–103 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Baumann, L., Baumann, P., Mandel, M. & Allen, R. D. Taxonomy of aerobic marine eubacteria. J. Bacteriol. 110, 402–429 (1972).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ivanova, E. P. et al. Ecophysiological diversity of a novel member of the genus Alteromonas, and description of Alteromonas mediterranea sp. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107, 119–132 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ivanova, E. P. et al. Alteromonas australica sp. nov., isolated from the Tasman Sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103, 877–884 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Van Trappen, S., Tan, T.-L., Yang, J., Mergaert, J. & Swings, J. Alteromonas stellipolaris sp. nov., a novel, budding, prosthecate bacterium from Antarctic seas, and emended description of the genus Alteromonas. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 1157–1163 (2004).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
López-Pérez, M. & Rodriguez-Valera, F. Pangenome evolution in the marine bacterium Alteromonas. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 1556–1570 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, I.-M. A. et al. The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.7: content updates and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D723–D732 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mukherjee, S. et al. Twenty-five years of Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): data updates and new features in v.9. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D957–D963 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D10–D17 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Paoli, L. et al. Biosynthetic potential of the global ocean microbiome. Nature 607, 111–118 (2022).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
López-Pérez, M., Gonzaga, A., Ivanova, E. P. & Rodriguez-Valera, F. Genomes of Alteromonas australica, a world apart. BMC Genomics 15, 483 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yin, Y. et al. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W445–51 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernández-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825–5829 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buck, M., Mehrshad, M. & Bertilsson, S. mOTUpan: a robust Bayesian approach to leverage metagenome-assembled genomes for core-genome estimation. NAR Genom Bioinform 4, lqac060 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
DeMers, M. & Braakman, R. Alteromonas Digital Organism Databases. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7517480 (2023).Repeta, D. J. Chapter 2 – Chemical characterization and cycling of dissolved organic matter. in Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter (Second Edition) (eds. Hansell, D. A. & Carlson, C. A.) 21–63 (Academic Press, 2015).Kelly, L., Huang, K. H., Ding, H. & Chisholm, S. W. ProPortal: a resource for integrated systems biology of Prochlorococcus and its phage. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D632–40 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Groussman, R. D., Blaskowski, S., Coesel, S. N. & Armbrust, E. V. MarFERReT, an open-source, version-controlled reference library of marine microbial eukaryote functional genes. Sci Data 10, 926 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Durham, B. P. et al. Cryptic carbon and sulfur cycling between surface ocean plankton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 453–457 (2015).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Landa, M. et al. Sulfur metabolites that facilitate oceanic phytoplankton–bacteria carbon flux. ISME J. 13, 2536–2550 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Uchimiya, M., Schroer, W., Olofsson, M., Edison, A. S. & Moran, M. A. Diel investments in metabolite production and consumption in a model microbial system. ISME J. 16, 1306–1317 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Parks, D. H. et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D785–D794 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gordon, A. & Hannon, G. J. Fastx-toolkit. (2010).Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10 (2021).McKinney, W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a (SciPy, 2010).The pandas development team. Pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7794821 (2023).Waskom, M. Seaborn: statistical data visualization. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021 (The Open Journal, 2021).Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–D26 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y. & Morishima, K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 726–731 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rambaut, A. FigTree.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018).Yu, G. Decorate a ‘ggplot’ with associated information [R package aplot version 0.1.10]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2023).Morgan, M. Access the Bioconductor project package repository [R package BiocManager version 1.30.20]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2023).Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K. & Vaughan, D. A grammar of data manipulation [R package dplyr version 1.1.2]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2023).Campitelli, E. Multiple fill and colour scales in ‘ggplot2’ [R package ggnewscale version 0.4.8]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2022).Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. (Springer-Verlag New York, 2016).Henry, L., Wickham, H. & Chang, W. Ggstance: horizontal ggplot2 components. (Github 2022).Yu, G. Data Integration, Manipulation and Visualization of Phylogenetic Trees. (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2022).Xu, S. et al. Ggtree: a serialized data object for visualization of a phylogenetic tree and annotation data. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.56 (2022).Yu, G. Using ggtree to visualize data on tree-like structures. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 69, e96 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, G., Lam, T. T.-Y., Zhu, H. & Guan, Y. Two methods for mapping and visualizing associated data on phylogeny using ggtree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 3041–3043 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y. & Lam, T. T.-Y. Ggtree: An R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 28–36 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xu, S. et al. ggtreeExtra: Compact visualization of richly annotated phylogenetic data. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab166 (2021).Jolly, K. Nationalparkcolors: R package for color themes inspired by National Parks. (Github).Wickham, H. The Split-Apply-Combine strategy for data analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–29 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Neuwirth, E. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. [R package RColorBrewer version 1.1-3]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2022).Wickham, H. & Seidel, D. Scale functions for visualization [R package scales version 1.2.1]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2022).Wickham, H., Vaughan, D. & Girlich, M. Tidyr: Tidy messy data [R package tidyr version 1.3.0]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2023).Ou, J. Safe color set for color blindness [R package colorBlindness version 0.1.9]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2021).Oettinghaus, B. Easyalluvial: Generate alluvial plots with a single line of code [R package version 0.3.1]. (Github 2022).Auguie, B. Miscellaneous functions for ‘grid’ graphics [R package gridExtra version 2.3]. (Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) 2017).O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D733–45 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
DiatOmicBase. https://www.diatomicsbase.bio.ens.psl.eu/.Sajed, T. et al. ECMDB 2.0: A richer resource for understanding the biochemistry of E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D495–501 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Arkin, A. P. et al. KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 566–569 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Galaxy Community. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W345–W351 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gillespie, J. J. et al. PATRIC: the comprehensive bacterial bioinformatics resource with a focus on human pathogenic species. Infect. Immun. 79, 4286–4298 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Merchant, N. et al. The iPlant Collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for enabling data to discovery for the life sciences. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002342 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Aziz, R. K. et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9, 75 (2008).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–6 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Olson, R. D. et al. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D678–D689 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Grigoriev, I. V. et al. PhycoCosm, a comparative algal genomics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1004–D1011 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, M. D. GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics 35, 4162–4164 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Karp, P. D. et al. Pathway Tools version 24.0: Integrated software for Pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. arXiv [q-bio.GN] (2015).Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ