Microporous membrane with ionized sub-nanochannels enabling highly selective monovalent and divalent anion separation

Tailoring TB polymers with QA groups for enhanced membrane propertiesAs depicted in Fig. 2a, the TB polymers were synthesized from o-benzidine (DMB) and dimethoxymethane (DMM) monomers via an acid-catalyzed polycondensation reaction25, as verified by Fourier-transform infrared spectra and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (Supplementary Figs. 1–2). The QA groups were then incorporated into the TB polymer skeleton to provide an ion transport channel (Supplementary Fig. 3-4). The structural composition of the TB units and the incorporation of QA groups give TB/QA-TB membranes distinctive and superior physical and chemical properties. The membranes have the characteristic surface of dense polymer membranes without obvious defects (Supplementary Fig. 5). As shown in Fig. 2b, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was employed to probe the thermal resilience of the membranes. Both TB and QA-TB membranes exhibited a remarkable storage modulus exceeding 1000 MPa within the temperature range of 120 to 290 °C, showcasing outstanding thermo-mechanical stability. Additionally, tensile strength plays a pivotal role in membrane performance and mechanical stability. Given the high rigidity of PIM materials, both membranes demonstrated substantial tensile strength of ~60 MPa (Supplementary Fig. 6). Moreover, TB polymers with rigid backbones and pronounced hydrophobic characteristics are effective in mitigating membrane swelling. As a result, TB and QA-TB membranes exhibited low water uptake values of 4.05% and 1.75%, respectively, accompanied by corresponding swelling ratios of 0.99% and 1.01% (Fig. 2c). The swelling ratios for both TB and QA-TB membranes were significantly lower at room temperature compared with other ion exchange membranes in the literature (Supplementary Table 1).Fig. 2: Synthesis routes and physicochemical properties of TB and QA-TB membranes.a Synthetic pathway for TB and QA-TB polymers. b Thermo-mechanical analysis, (c) water uptake and swelling ratios, (d) zeta potential curves, (e) ionic conductivity, and (f) ion fluxes of TB and QA-TB membranes. Error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from three parallel measurements. g Radar plot comparing the physicochemical properties of TB and QA-TB membranes.Polymer membranes designed for ion separation commonly necessitate a high ion exchange capacity (IEC) to ensure superior ionic conductivity and effective ion separation within the designated channels. Nonetheless, the high IEC of a membrane often accompanies increased water retention, resulting in substantial swelling ratios that may jeopardize the integrated structure and stable performance of the membranes26. Remarkably, in this work, the QA-TB membranes exhibited significantly lower swelling ratios while the IEC remained at a mere 0.0167 meq g−1. This minimal value is ascribed to a strong adsorption force of I- within the membrane, hindering its release during the ion exchange process. As illustrated by the zeta potential spectra in Fig. 2d, the QA-TB membrane exhibited a more pronounced negative charge, which could be attributed to the presence of absorbed I-. However, the introduction of charged QA groups effectively increases the ionic conductivity of QA-TB membrane (Fig. 2e). Moreover, the QA-TB membrane demonstrates a notably elevated monovalent anion flux, surpassing that of the TB membrane to a significant degree (Fig. 2f). This indicates that, despite the decrease in IEC value of the QA-TB membrane, the engineered ionized sub-nanochannels remain capable of ensuring smooth transport of monovalent anions. A comparison of the membrane properties (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Table 2) indicates that the QA-TB membrane is more adept at facilitating the migration of monovalent ions, rendering it better suited for the separation of monovalent and divalent anions.Probing Cl- and CO3
2- ion migrationTo evaluate the selectivity of the QA-TB membrane toward monovalent and divalent anions, an electrochemical device comprised of four compartments was employed. The effective area of the membrane inside the device was 19.63 cm2. Considering the optimal performance on targeted ion flux and selectivity, the following conditions were employed in the subsequent ion separation experiments: an ion concentration of 100 mM, a concentration chamber to dilution chamber volume ratio of 1:1, and a current density of 100 A m−2 (Fig. 3a). This approach exhibits low energy consumption in different systems, with an energy consumption ratio of ~0.42–0.48 kWh·mol−1, and maintains a current efficiency above 60% even after the continuous 24 h operation (Supplementary Fig. 7).Fig. 3: Short-term migration of Cl- and CO32- anions.a Schematic diagram of the four-compartment electrochemical device for ion separation. The CEMs were SPEEK membranes and the AEMs were QA-TB membranes. b Concentration profiles in the concentration chamber and (c) ion fluxes of Cl- and CO32- through the QA-TB membrane during the 1-h experiment.The migration of Cl- and CO32- anions in 1 h was examined, as in Fig. 3b, c. Initially, Cl- was preferentially transported across the membrane within the initial 25 min and exhibited an increase in migration amount over time. Intriguingly, there was no discernible migration of CO32- during this period. Although a minimal migration of CO32- was observed within the final 35 min, amounting to less than one-fifth of the migration of Cl-, it remained relatively steady (Fig. 3b). Because CO32- exhibits greater dehydration difficulty and consequently migrates more slowly than Cl- ions, especially when hydrated. Furthermore, the ion flux data visually indicated the preferential migration of Cl-. The Cl- flux peaked at 16.13 × 10−4  mol m−2 s−1, and the subsequent decrease (Fig. 3c) could be ascribed to the continuous reduction in the overall concentration of Cl- inside the dilution chamber. In addition, CO32- readily undergoes hydrolysis, producing a small amount of HCO3- that may compete with Cl- and decrease the migration rate of Cl-. The pH value of the solution could influence the hydrolysis degree and the existing form of CO32- 27. To mitigate the influence of HCO3- on the separation process, the pH value of the solution was monitored while titrating the concentration of CO32-. No substantial alterations in pH and CO32- were found in the dilution chamber, indicating that CO32- remained the predominant form in the solution (Supplementary Fig. 8). Consequently, only a minimal amount of CO32- underwent hydrolysis, allowing a negligible portion to migrate. This circumstance of different migration rates enhances the selectivity of the separation between the two ions.Sustained separation of Cl- and CO3
2-
The sub-nanochannels in the QA-TB membrane demonstrated a remarkable ability to promote the migration of monovalent anions and limit the transport of divalent anions (Fig. 4a). To investigate the long-term separation performance of the membrane, the QA-TB membrane was tested for 12 consecutive days to monitor the ion flux and permeation selectivity. As depicted in Fig. 4b, although the ion flux gradually decreased over time, the Cl- flux remained significantly higher than that of CO32- by an order of magnitude. As a result, the migration amount of Cl- in the concentration chamber steadily increased over 12 days until it plateaued due to complete migration of Cl- in the dilution chamber, whereas the slow penetration of CO32- resulted in its migration remaining minimal and plateaued (Fig. 4c). Consequently, the concentrations of the two ions in the concentration chamber exhibited a tenfold difference, effectively elevating the permeation selectivity to 106 (Fig. 4d).Fig. 4: Long-term separation performance of the QA-TB membrane for monovalent and divalent anions.a Schematic illustration depicting the promotion of monovalent anion migration and limitation of divalent anion transport through the sub-nanochannels of the QA-TB membrane. b Comparison of monovalent and divalent ion fluxes over 12 days. c Ion concentration in the concentration chamber. d Perm-selectivity of the QA-TB membrane for Cl- and CO32- separation. e Comparison of monovalent and divalent anion separation performance of QA-TB membrane with previously reported membranes.Expanding applicability: Cl⁻/SO4²⁻ separation and literature comparisonWhile the separation of Cl⁻ and CO3²⁻ showcased the exceptional selectivity of the QA-TB membrane for monovalent/divalent anion pairs, studies on this specific separation are relatively scarce in the literature. To facilitate a more comprehensive evaluation and direct comparison with established benchmarks, we investigated the performance of the QA-TB membrane for separating Cl⁻ from another commonly encountered divalent anion, sulfate (SO4²⁻). Industries like petroleum, pharmaceutical plants, and paper mills often produce vast amounts of highly saline wastewater containing sulfates and chlorides28,29. Consequently, the separation of Cl- and SO42- is crucial. During Cl-/SO42- separation trials, the QA-TB membrane demonstrated outstanding separation efficiency. The migration of Cl- in 1 h was markedly higher than that of SO42- (Supplementary Fig. 9), achieving a Cl- flux of 20.37 × 10−4  mol m−2 s−1 and a permeation selectivity of 82 (Supplementary Fig. 10). The ion migration rate was even faster than that in the Cl-/CO32- system, with complete Cl- migration achieved within 48 h (Supplementary Fig. 11), while the optimal permeation selectivity was slightly lower (\({{{\rm{P}}}}_{{{{\rm{SO}}}}_{4}^{2-}}^{{{{\rm{Cl}}}}^{-}}=82 < {{{\rm{P}}}}_{{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{3}^{2-}}^{{{{\rm{Cl}}}}^{-}}=106\)). This difference arises from that a small amount of HCO3- initially reduces the Cl- flux, while CO32- has larger size and higher hydration free energy compared to Cl- and SO42-. Consequently, CO32- dehydrates and migrates at the slowest rate, resulting in higher selectivity for separation from Cl-. However, the Cl- and SO42- separation performance of the QA-TB membrane far exceeds those reported in the literature (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Table 3).Unveiling separation mechanisms: ion dehydration, microphase separation, and ion interactionsThe excellent selectivity of the QA-TB membrane for monovalent and divalent anions could stem from the size effect and the presence of the induced QA groups. On the one hand, the constructed ion channels are unable to accommodate the migration of hydrated ions, resulting in dehydration. The dehydration ability of ions directly influences their diffusion speed through sub-nanochannels30. On the other hand, the distinct hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties between the polymer backbone and the introduced QA groups facilitate the formation of a microphase separation structure within the membrane, which provides channels for the migration of ions31. Meanwhile, different degrees of electrostatic interaction between the QA-TB framework and ions help ions with different free energies and transfer along the pore walls at different speeds. Greater disparity in migration rates could lead to higher selectivity in the separation process.Appropriate characterizations were conducted to support this mechanism. First, the dense nature of the material impedes the smooth migration of hydrated ions through the constructed ion channels based on the size sieving effect. The microporosity of the membranes was characterized using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS). As depicted in Supplementary Figs. 12–13 and Fig. 5a, the pore size of the QA-TB membrane is smaller than that of the TB membrane, which can be attributed to quaternization enhancing ionic/polar chain interactions32. Therefore, the fractional free volume (FFV) decreased, and the membrane cavities were reduced (Supplementary Table 4). In Fig. 5b and Supplementary Table 5, a comparison of the ion sizes reveals significant differences between bare ions and hydrated ions, with the pore size of the QA-TB membrane falling between their hydration diameter and the Stokes diameter. Additionally, significantly different hydration free energies are observed for Cl-, CO32-, and SO42-. The minimal hydration-free energy of Cl- eases the shedding of the surrounding H2O molecules. However, SO42- and CO32- possess considerably higher hydration free energies and form stronger bonds with water molecules33. In particular, CO32- demonstrates facile hydrolysis and strong polarity. It easily binds to polar water molecules and needs to overcome the larger dehydration resistance to pass through sub-nanochannels, which leads to its slower diffusion and lower ion flux. This substantial variation in migration rates significantly enhances the ion separation selectivity.Fig. 5: Effect of pore size of microporous membranes on the separation performance for differentiating monovalent and divalent anions.a Free volume pore sizes of the TB and QA-TB membranes obtained via PALS. b Schematic illustration of the separation mechanisms for monovalent (Cl-) and divalent (CO3²⁻, SO4²⁻) anions, considering the influence of hydration energy.In addition, the hydrophilicity of the QA groups promotes the formation of a dual-phase structure within the membrane which increases the interaction with dehydrated ions34. To confirm the hydrophilic attributes of these groups, the water sorption characteristics within the membrane were investigated via dynamic vapor sorption curves (DVS) under varying relative humidity conditions (Fig. 6a). The findings indicate a slightly elevated water sorption rate in the QA-TB membrane compared to the TB membrane. However, the water sorption rate in both membranes remains low, not exceeding 20%, indicating that the membranes retain a considerable degree of hydrophobicity, as evidenced by their minimal swelling (Fig. 2c). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) results depicted in Fig. 6b-c clearly show that the TB membrane exhibits a uniform structure comprising solely hydrophobic polymer backbones. In contrast, the QA-TB membrane displays distinct light and dark regions due to the different hydrophilicity of the polymer and functional groups. The bright regions represent the hydrophobic segments of the polymer backbone, whereas the dark regions correspond to the hydrophilic portions of the quaternary ammonium groups35. The rigid and twisted structure of the TB polymer hampers the neat stacking of their main chain, resulting in a greater accumulation of hydrophobic skeletons in different directions and an increased hydrophobic area within the membrane. This structural arrangement creates ionized sub-nanochannels that enable dehydrated ions to rapidly migrate from these regions driven by an electric field36. To further explain the migration rates of different dehydrated anions within the ionized sub-nanochannels, the adsorption and desorption properties of Cl-/SO4²⁻/CO3²⁻ along the polymeric backbone of QA-TB were analyzed by the density-functional theory (DFT)37 calculation (Fig. 6d, Supplementary Figs. 14–15 and Supplementary Table 6). The adsorption and desorption of ions in the sub-nanochannels were attributed to the presence of electrostatic interaction forces between Cl-/SO4²⁻/CO3²⁻ and the quaternary ammonium groups on the pore walls. The results show that dehydrated Cl- has the lowest free energy, resulting in the shortest residence time and the fastest migration. This aligns well with the ultra-high selectivity between Cl- and CO32-/SO42- in ionized QA-TB membranes.Fig. 6: Anion separation across the ionized sub-nanochannels.a Water sorption behavior of TB and QA-TB membranes investigated using dynamic vapor sorption (DVS). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the (b) TB membrane and (c) QA-TB membrane. The bright regions in (c) represent the hydrophobic segments of the polymer backbone, whereas the dark regions correspond to the hydrophilic portions of the QA groups. The partitioning calculation using ImageJ software reveals that the percentage of hydrophilic region is about 22.71% and the percentage of hydrophobic region is about 77.29%. d Electrostatic potential diagrams and calculations of adsorption and desorption energies for Cl-/SO4²⁻/CO3²⁻ on the surface of QA-TB. The CO32- exhibits greater negative adsorption energy, indicating stronger adsorption to QA-TB, and has higher desorption energy, hindering desorption. Conversely, Cl- shows the lowest free energy, resulting in faster migration.

Hot Topics

Related Articles