Shehzad, Z. et al. The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. Cereb. Cortex 19, 2209–2229 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zuo, X.-N. et al. The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. Neuroimage 49, 1432–1445 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bennett, C. M. & Miller, M. B. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1191, 133–155 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zuo, X.-N., Xu, T. & Milham, M. P. Harnessing reliability for neuroscience research. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 768–771 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kraemer, H. C. The reliability of clinical diagnoses: state of the art. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 10, 111–130 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Button, K. S. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365–376 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Noble, S., Scheinost, D. & Constable, R. T. A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage 203, 116157 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zuo, X.-N. & Xing, X.-X. Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 45, 100–118 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cho, J. W., Korchmaros, A., Vogelstein, J. T., Milham, M. P. & Xu, T. Impact of concatenating fMRI data on reliability for functional connectomics. Neuroimage 226, 117549 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lynch, C. J. et al. Rapid precision functional mapping of individuals using multi-echo fMRI. Cell Rep. 33, 108540 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nikolaidis, A. et al. Bagging improves reproducibility of functional parcellation of the human brain. Neuroimage 214, 116678 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yoo, K. et al. Multivariate approaches improve the reliability and validity of functional connectivity and prediction of individual behaviors. Neuroimage 197, 212–223 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Elliott, M. L. et al. What is the test-retest reliability of common task-functional MRI measures? New empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. Psychol. Sci. 31, 792–806 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Palumbo, L. et al. Evaluation of the intra- and inter-method agreement of brain MRI segmentation software packages: a comparison between SPM12 and FreeSurfer v6.0. Phys. Med. 64, 261–272 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Oakes, T. R. et al. Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. Neuroimage 28, 529–543 (2005).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Klein, A. et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46, 786–802 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dickie, E., Hodge, S., Craddock, R., Poline, J.-B. & Kennedy, D. Tools matter: comparison of two surface analysis tools applied to the ABIDE dataset. Res. Ideas Outcomes 3, e13726 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bhagwat, N. et al. Understanding the impact of preprocessing pipelines on neuroimaging cortical surface analyses. Gigascience 10, giaa155 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Carp, J. On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Front. Neurosci. 6, 149 (2012).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pauli, R. et al. Exploring fMRI results space: 31 variants of an fMRI analysis in AFNI, FSL, and SPM. Front. Neuroinform. 10, 24 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bowring, A., Maumet, C. & Nichols, T. E. Exploring the impact of analysis software on task fMRI results. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 3362–3384 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bowring, A., Nichols, T. E. & Maumet, C. Isolating the sources of pipeline-variability in group-level task-fMRI results. Hum. Brain Mapp. 43, 1112–1128 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Botvinik-Nezer, R. et al. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 582, 84–88 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Feczko, E., Conan, G., Marek, S. & Tervo-Clemmens, B. Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) community MRI collection and utilities. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.09.451638 (2021).Xu, T., Yang, Z., Jiang, L., Xing, X.-X. & Zuo, X.-N. A connectome computation system for discovery science of brain. Sci. Bull. (Beijing) 60, 86–95 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Craddock, C. et al. Towards automated analysis of connectomes: the configurable pipeline for the analysis of connectomes (C-PAC). Front. Neuroinform. 42, 10-3389 (2013).
Google ScholarÂ
Chao-Gan, Y. & Yu-Feng, Z. DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for ‘pipeline’ data analysis of resting-State fMRI. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4, 13 (2010).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Esteban, O. et al. fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat. Methods 16, 111–116 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Murphy, K. & Fox, M. D. Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 154, 169–173 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zuo, X.-N. et al. An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci. Data 1, 140049 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shou, H. et al. Quantifying the reliability of image replication studies: the image intraclass correlation coefficient (I2C2). Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 714–724 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bridgeford, E. W. et al. Eliminating accidental deviations to minimize generalization error and maximize replicability: applications in connectomics and genomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009279 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schaefer, A. et al. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb. Cortex 28, 3095–3114 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Glasser, M. F. et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Greve, D. N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48, 63–72 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alexander, L. M. et al. An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders. Sci. Data 4, 170181 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).Dong, Y., Ifrim, G., Mladenić, D., Saunders, C. & Van Hoecke, S. Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Applied data science and demo track. In Proc. European Conference, ECML PKDD 2020 Part V (eds Dong, Y. et al.) 3–18 (Springer Nature, 2021).Birn, R. M. et al. The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 83, 550–558 (2013).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, T. T., Nalci, A. & Falahpour, M. The global signal in fMRI: nuisance or information? Neuroimage 150, 213–229 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ciric, R. et al. Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity. Neuroimage 154, 174–187 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buades, A., Coll, B. & Morel, J.-M. Non-local means denoising. IPOL J. 1, 208–212 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tustison, N. J. et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1310–1320 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ciric, R. et al. TemplateFlow: FAIR-sharing of multi-scale, multi-species brain models. Nat. Methods 19, 1568–1571 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fonov, V. S., Evans, A. C., McKinstry, R. C., Almli, C. R. & Collins, D. L. Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. Neuroimage 47, S102 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Grabner, G. et al. Symmetric atlasing and model based segmentation: an application to the hippocampus in older adults. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 9, 58–66 (2006).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mazziotta, J. et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 356, 1293–1322 (2001).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wu, J. et al. Accurate nonlinear mapping between MNI volumetric and FreeSurfer surface coordinate systems. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 3793–3808 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Uddin, L. Q. Mixed signals: on separating brain signal from noise. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 405–406 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Murphy, K., Birn, R. M., Handwerker, D. A., Jones, T. B. & Bandettini, P. A. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage 44, 893–905 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xu, H. et al. Impact of global signal regression on characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states. Neuroimage 173, 127–145 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gordon, E. M. et al. Precision functional mapping of individual human brains. Neuron 95, 791–807 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Di Martino, A. et al. Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II. Sci. Data 4, 170010 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Casey, B. J. et al. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 43–54 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Richie-Halford, A. et al. Author correction: an analysis-ready and quality controlled resource for pediatric brain white-matter research. Sci. Data 10, 247 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Doshi, J. et al. MUSE: Multi-atlas region segmentation utilizing ensembles of registration algorithms and parameters, and locally optimal atlas selection. NeuroImage 127, 186–195 (2016).Wu, D. et al. Resource atlases for multi-atlas brain segmentations with multiple ontology levels based on T1-weighted MRI. Neuroimage 125, 120–130 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kiar, G., Chatelain, Y., Salari, A., Evans, A. C. & Glatard, T. Data augmentation through Monte Carlo arithmetic leads to more generalizable classification in connectomics. Neurons Behav. Data Anal. Theory 1, 1–20 (2021).
Google ScholarÂ
Kiar, G. et al. Numerical uncertainty in analytical pipelines lead to impactful variability in brain networks. PLoS ONE 16, e0250755 (2021).Mehta, K. et al. XCP-D: a robust pipeline for the post-processing of fMRI data. Preprint at bioRxiv 10.1101/2023.11.20.567926 (2023).Bujang, M. & Baharum, N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch. Orofac. Sci. 12, 1–11 (2017).
Google ScholarÂ
Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23, S208–S219 (2004).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17, 825–841 (2002).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cox, R. W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162–173 (1996).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Y., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 45–57 (2001).Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. & Song, G. Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J. 2, 1–35 (2009).
Google ScholarÂ
Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jenkinson, M. & Smith, S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 5, 143–156 (2001).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Berger, V. W. & Zhou, Y. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test: overview https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06558 (2014).Nachar, N. The Mann-Whitney U: a test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 4, 13–20 (2008).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, X. & Clucas, J. XinhuiLi/PipelineHarmonization: Pipeline Harmonization Version 0.0.0 Beta. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5733801 (2021).