Bitew, A., Mengist, A., Belew, H., Aschale, Y. & Reta, A. The prevalence, antibiotic resistance pattern, and associated factors of bacterial vaginosis among women of the reproductive age group from felege hiwot referral hospital, Ethiopia. Infect. Drug Resist. 5, 2685–2696 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schellenberg, J. J., Patterson, M. H. & Hill, J. E. Gardnerella vaginalis diversity and ecology in relation to vaginal symptoms. Res. Microbiol. 168, 837–844 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Qin, H. & Xiao, B. Research progress on the correlation between Gardnerella typing and bacterial vaginosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12, 858155 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ma, X. et al. Biofilm and pathogenic factor analysis of Gardnerella vaginalis associated with bacterial vaginosis in Northeast China. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1033040 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bhujel, R., Mishra, S. K., Yadav, S. K., Bista, K. D. & Parajuli, K. Comparative study of Amsel’s criteria and Nugent scoring for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a tertiary care hospital, Nepal. BMC Infect. Dis. 21, 1–6 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nenadić, D. B., Pavlović, M. D. & Motrenko, T. A novel microscopic method for analyzing Gram-stained vaginal smears in the diagnosis of disorders of vaginal microflora. Vojnosanit. Pregl. 72, 670–676 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Numanović, F. et al. Importance of isolation and biotypization of Gardnerella vaginalis in diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 8, 270 (2008).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Redelinghuys, M. J., Geldenhuys, J., Jung, H. & Kock, M. M. J. Bacterial vaginosis: Current diagnostic avenues and future opportunities. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 354 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Janulaitiene, M. et al. Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis. BMC Infect. Dis. 17, 1–9 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pleckaityte, M. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins produced by vaginal bacteria: Certainties and controversies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9, 452 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hardy, L. et al. The presence of the putative Gardnerella vaginalis sialidase A gene in vaginal specimens is associated with bacterial vaginosis biofilm. PLoS ONE 12, e0172522 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Abbe, C. & Mitchell, C. M. Bacterial vaginosis: A review of approaches to treatment and prevention. Front. Reprod. Health 5, 1100029 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wu, S., Hugerth, L. W., Schuppe-Koistinen, I. & Du, J. The right bug in the right place: opportunities for bacterial vaginosis treatment. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 34 (2022).Munoz-Barreno, A., Cabezas-Mera, F., Tejera, E. & Machado, A. Comparative effectiveness of treatments for bacterial vaginosis: A network meta-analysis. Antibiotics 10, 978 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Owens, D. K. et al. Screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnant persons to prevent preterm delivery: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Jama 323, 1286–1292 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bradshaw, C. S. & Sobel, J. D. Current treatment of bacterial vaginosis—Limitations and need for innovation. J. Infect. Dis. 214, S14–S20 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alturki, N. A. et al. Therapeutic target identification and inhibitor screening against riboflavin synthase of colorectal cancer associated fusobacterium nucleatum. Cancers 14, 6260 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sinoliya, P., Solanki, P. S., Niraj, R. R. K. & Sharma, V. Computational study of antimicrobial peptides for promising therapeutic applications against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734099285473240101111303 (2024).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sinoliya, P., Solanki, P. S., Piplani, S., Kumar Niraj, R. R. & Sharma, V. Anti-microbial peptides against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Promising therapeutics. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 24, 156–177. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203724666221216115850 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gupta, S. R. et al. Comparative proteome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains-H37Ra, H37Rv, CCDC5180, and CAS/NITR204: A step forward to identify novel drug targets. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 17, 1422–1431 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zaidi, S., Bhardwaj, T., Somvanshi, P. & Khan, A. U. Proteomic characterization and target identification against Streptococcus mutans under bacitracin stress conditions using LC–MS and subtractive proteomics. Protein J. 41, 166–178 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Öztürk, H., Özgür, A. & Ozkirimli, E. DeepDTA: Deep drug-target binding affinity prediction. Bioinformatics 34, i821–i829 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alzamami, A., Alturki, N. A., Khan, K., Basharat, Z. & Mashraqi, M. M. Screening inhibitors against the Ef-Tu of Fusobacterium nucleatum: A docking, ADMET and PBPK assessment study. Mol. Divers. 1–18 (2024).Korf, I., Yandell, M. & Bedell, J. Blast. (O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2003).Liu, S. et al. CEG 2.0: An updated database of clusters of essential genes including eukaryotic organisms. Database 2020, baaa112 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, R., Ou, H. Y. & Zhang, C. T. DEG: A database of essential genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D271–D272 (2004).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Basharat, Z., Jahanzaib, M., Yasmin, A. & Khan, I. A. Pan-genomics, drug candidate mining and ADMET profiling of natural product inhibitors screened against Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Genomics 113, 238–244 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank 5.0: A major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1074–D1082 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Grasso, D., Galderisi, S., Santucci, A. & Bernini, A. Pharmacological chaperones and protein conformational diseases: Approaches of computational structural biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 5819 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bull, S. C. & Doig, A. J. Properties of protein drug target classes. PloS one 10, e0117955 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gasteiger, E. et al. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. (Humana Press, 2005).Hallgren, J. et al. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. BioRxiv: 2022.2004.2008.487609 (2022).Saha, S. & Raghava, G. P. BTXpred: Prediction of bacterial toxins. In Silico Biol. 7, 405–412 (2007).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sharma, N. et al. AlgPred 2.0: An improved method for predicting allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 294 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Künzli, M., Bordoli, L. & Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D387–D392 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bæk, K. T. & Kepp, K. P. Assessment of AlphaFold2 for human proteins via residue solvent exposure. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 3391–3400 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N. & Peitsch, M. C. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3381–3385 (2003).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Perrakis, A. & Sixma, T. K. AI revolutions in biology: The joys and perils of AlphaFold. EMBO Rep. 22, e54046 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: Making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Heo, L., Park, H. & Seok, C. GalaxyRefine: Protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W384–W388 (2013).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Laskowski, R. A. et al. PDBsum: A web-based database of summaries and analyses of all PDB structures. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 488–490 (1997).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dallakyan, S. & Olson, A. J. Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Chem. Biol. Methods Protoc. 243–250 (2015).Sireesha, R. et al. Unveiling the anticancer mechanism of 1, 2, 3-triazole-incorporated thiazole-pyrimidine-isoxazoles: Insights from docking and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1–13 (2023).Laskowski, R. A. & Swindells, M. B. LigPlot+: Multiple ligand–protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51, 2778–2786 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Daina, A., Michielin, O. & Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 7, 42717 (2017).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pires, D. E., Blundell, T. L. & Ascher, D. B. pkCSM: Predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. J. Med. Chem. 58, 4066–4072 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ertl, P. & Schuffenhauer, A. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. J. Cheminform. 1, 1–11 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huai, Z., Shen, Z. & Sun, Z. Binding thermodynamics and interaction patterns of inhibitor-major urinary protein-I binding from extensive free-energy calculations: Benchmarking AMBER force fields. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 284–297 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Eskandari, A., Leow, T. C., Rahman, M. B. A. & Oslan, S. N. Molecular dynamics-guided insight into the adsorption–inhibition mechanism for controlling ice growth/melt of antifreeze protein type IV mutant from longhorn sculpin fish. Chem. Pap. 1–18 (2024).Wang, E. et al. End-point binding free energy calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and applications in drug design. Chem. Rev. 119, 9478–9508 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yokoyama, R., Kleven, B., Gupta, A., Wang, Y. & Maeda, H. A. 3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase as the gatekeeper of plant aromatic natural product biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 67, 102219 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, S., Xu, J.-Z. & Zhang, W.-G. Advances and prospects in metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for l-tryptophan production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 22 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Singh, P. et al. Biofuel from Microbes and Plants. 189–209 (CRC Press, 2021).Almeida, A. M. et al. Revisiting the Shikimate Pathway and Highlighting Their Enzyme Inhibitors. 1–37 (2023).Castro, J. I. R. Adhesion of Vaginal Microorganisms to Epithelial Cells and Its Association with Bacterial Vaginosis. (Universidade do Minho (Portugal), 2012).Anton, L. et al. Gardnerella vaginalis alters cervicovaginal epithelial cell function through microbe-specific immune responses. Microbiome 10, 119 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Niu, A. Toward Transition State Analysis of DAHP Synthase (2020).Jeckelmann, J.-M. & Erni, B. Carbohydrate transport by group translocation: the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate: Sugar phosphotransferase system. In Bacterial Cell Walls Membranes. 223–274 (2019).Agoni, C., Olotu, F. A., Ramharack, P. & Soliman, M. E. Druggability and drug-likeness concepts in drug design: Are biomodelling and predictive tools having their say?. J. Mol. Model. 26, 1–11 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Amabebe, E. & Anumba, D. O. Mechanistic insights into immune suppression and evasion in bacterial vaginosis. Curr. Microbiol. 79, 84 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wong, Y. P. et al. Gardnerella vaginalis infection in pregnancy: Effects on placental development and neonatal outcomes. Placenta 120, 79–87 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Daskalakis, G. et al. Maternal infection and preterm birth: from molecular basis to clinical implications. Children 10, 907 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Menard, J.-P. Antibacterial treatment of bacterial vaginosis: Current and emerging therapies. Int. J. Women’s Health 295–305 (2011).Owen, M. K. & Clenney, T. L. Management of vaginitis. Am. Fam. Phys. 70, 2125–2132 (2004).
Google ScholarÂ
Pentikis, H., Adetoro, N., Tipping, D. & Levy, S. An integrated efficacy and safety analysis of single-dose secnidazole 2 g in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Reprod. Sci. 27, 523–528 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Al-Kraety, I. A. A., Al-Muhanna, S. G., Banoon, S. R. & Ghasemian, A. Bacterial vaginosis pattern and antibiotic susceptibility testing in female patients using high vaginal swabs. Biodivers. J. Biol. Divers. 23, 34 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Qian, Z., Zhao, D., Yin, Y., Zhu, H. & Chen, D. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Mongolian yogurt against Gardnerella vaginalis. BioMed Res. Int. 2020 (2020).Ahmad, S. S. & Ali, F. A. Detection of ESBL, AmpC and metallo beta-lactamase mediated resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from women with genital tract infection. Eur. Sci. J. 10 (2014).Wang, S., Liu, D., Bilal, M., Wang, W. & Zhang, X. Uncovering the role of phzc as DAHP synthase in shikimate pathway of Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66. Biology 11, 86 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tohge, T. & R Fernie, A. An overview of compounds derived from the shikimate and phenylpropanoid pathways and their medicinal importance. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 17, 1013–1027 (2017).Almeida, A. M. et al. Revisiting the shikimate pathway and highlighting their enzyme inhibitors. Phytochem. Rev. 1–37 (2023).Dev, A., Tapas, S., Pratap, S. & Kumar, P. Structure and function of enzymes of shikimate pathway. Curr. Bioinform. 7, 374–391 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shumilin, I. A., Bauerle, R., Wu, J., Woodard, R. W. & Kretsinger, R. H. Crystal structure of the reaction complex of 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase from Thermotoga maritima refines the catalytic mechanism and indicates a new mechanism of allosteric regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 341, 455–466 (2004).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cui, D. et al. Molecular basis for feedback inhibition of tyrosine-regulated 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase from Escherichia coli. J. Struct. Biol. 206, 322–334 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Balachandran, N. et al. Potent inhibition of 3-deoxy-d-arabinoheptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase by DAHP oxime, a phosphate group mimic. Biochemistry 55, 6617–6629 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
de Oliveira, M. D., Araujo, J. D. O., Galúcio, J. M., Santana, K. & Lima, A. H. Targeting shikimate pathway: In silico analysis of phosphoenolpyruvate derivatives as inhibitors of EPSP synthase and DAHP synthase. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 101, 107735 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Stegemann, S., Leveiller, F., Franchi, D., De Jong, H. & Lindén, H. When poor solubility becomes an issue: From early stage to proof of concept. Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 31, 249–261 (2007).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fang, Y. Ligand–receptor interaction platforms and their applications for drug discovery. Exp. Opin. Drug Discov. 7, 969–988 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
He, J. et al. Binding properties of the natural red dye carthamin with human serum albumin: Surface plasmon resonance, isothermal titration microcalorimetry, and molecular docking analysis. Food Chem. 221, 650–656 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kairys, V., Baranauskiene, L., Kazlauskiene, M., Matulis, D. & Kazlauskas, E. Binding affinity in drug design: Experimental and computational techniques. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 14, 755–768 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Taskar, K. S., Harada, I. & Alluri, R. V. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling of transporter mediated drug absorption, clearance and drug–drug interactions. Curr. Drug Metab. 22, 523–531 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alrubia, S., Mao, J., Chen, Y., Barber, J. & Rostami-Hodjegan, A. Altered bioavailability and pharmacokinetics in Crohn’s disease: Capturing systems parameters for PBPK to assist with predicting the fate of orally administered drugs. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 61, 1365–1392 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hartmanshenn, C., Scherholz, M. & Androulakis, I. P. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models: Approaches for enabling personalized medicine. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 43, 481–504 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rowland Yeo, K., Aarabi, M., Jamei, M. & Rostami-Hodjegan, A. Modeling and predicting drug pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 4, 261–274 (2011).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ