Jonasch, E., Gao, J. & Rathmell, W. K. Renal cell carcinoma. BMJ 349, 14797. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4797 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hsieh, J. J. et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 3, 17009. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.9 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Turajlic, S., Swanton, C. & Boshoff, C. Kidney cancer: The next decade. J Exp Med 215, 2477–2479. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20181617 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jonasch, E., Walker, C. L. & Rathmell, W. K. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma ontogeny and mechanisms of lethality. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 17, 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00359-2 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hutter, C. & Zenklusen, J. C. The cancer genome atlas: creating lasting value beyond its data. Cell 173, 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.042 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Grossman, I. ADME pharmacogenetics: current practices and future outlook. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 5, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425250902902322 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, D. G., Marri, S., McKinnon, R. A., Mackenzie, P. I. & Meech, R. Deregulation of the genes that are involved in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 368, 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.118.255018 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rosenthal, S. B., Bush, K. T. & Nigam, S. K. A network of SLC and ABC transporter and DME genes involved in remote sensing and signaling in the gut-liver-kidney axis. Sci Rep 9, 11879. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47798-x (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fisel, P., Schaeffeler, E. & Schwab, M. DNA methylation of ADME genes. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 99, 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.343 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Drozdzik, M. & Oswald, S. Expression and regulation of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes in the human gastrointestinal tract. Curr. Med. Chem. 23, 4468–4489. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867323666161024154457 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huang, J. F. et al. Overexpression of ABCB4 contributes to acquired doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 82, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3603-y (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Matheux, A. et al. PXR modulates the prostate cancer cell response to afatinib by regulating the expression of the monocarboxylate transporter SLC16A1. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143635 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cheng, S. Y. et al. Glutathione S-transferase M3 is associated with glycolysis in intrinsic temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma multiforme cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137080 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, D. G., Mackenzie, P. I., Nair, P. C., McKinnon, R. A. & Meech, R. The expression profiles of ADME genes in human cancers and their associations with clinical outcomes. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113369 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, G. et al. DPEP1 inhibits tumor cell invasiveness, enhances chemosensitivity and predicts clinical outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 7, e31507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031507 (2012).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Thorsson, V. et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity 48, 812-830 e814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, S. M., Sun, Z. Q., Li, H. Y., Wang, J. & Liu, Q. Y. Temporal identification of dysregulated genes and pathways in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on systematic tracking of disrupted modules. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015, 313740. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/313740 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zou, X. & Mo, Z. CYP2J2 is a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 3771866. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3771866 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lu, J. et al. ABAT and ALDH6A1, regulated by transcription factor HNF4A, suppress tumorigenic capability in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J. Transl. Med. 18, 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02268-1 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hinshaw, D. C. & Shevde, L. A. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res. 79, 4557–4566. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3962 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pitt, J. M. et al. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: removing obstruction to anticancer immune responses and immunotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 27, 1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw168 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature 541, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21349 (2017).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jiang, P. et al. Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response. Nat. Med. 24, 1550–1558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0136-1 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Charoentong, P. et al. Pan-cancer immunogenomic analyses reveal genotype-immunophenotype relationships and predictors of response to checkpoint blockade. Cell Rep 18, 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.019 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Muzio, G., Maggiora, M., Paiuzzi, E., Oraldi, M. & Canuto, R. A. Aldehyde dehydrogenases and cell proliferation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 52, 735–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.11.033 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Peng, X., Zheng, T., Guo, Y. & Zhu, Y. Amino acid metabolism genes associated with immunotherapy responses and clinical prognosis of colorectal cancer. Front Mol. Biosci. 9, 955705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.955705 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Morioka, S. et al. Efferocytosis induces a novel SLC program to promote glucose uptake and lactate release. Nature 563, 714–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0735-5 (2018).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, K. K. et al. miR-124 is frequently down-regulated in medulloblastoma and is a negative regulator of SLC16A1. Hum. Pathol. 40, 1234–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.02.003 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Matheux, A. et al. PXR modulates the prostate cancer cell response to afatinib by regulating the expression of the monocarboxylate transporter SLC16A1. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143635 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
You, S. et al. Construction of SLC16A1/3 targeted gallic acid-iron-embelin nanoparticles for regulating glycolysis and redox pathways in cervical cancer. Mol. Pharm. 20, 4574–4586. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00294 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhong, P. C. et al. Altered gene expression in glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis correlates with outcome of triple-negative breast cancer. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 246, 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370220975206 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, G., Liu, X., Wang, D., Sun, M. & Yang, Q. Identification and development of subtypes with poor prognosis in pan-gynecological cancer based on gene expression in the glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis. Front. Oncol. 11, 636565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.636565 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, E. et al. Identification of subgroups along the glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis and the development of an associated prognostic risk model. Hum. Genomics 15, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-021-00350-3 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, Y. J. et al. Interaction between glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis and tumor microenvironment reveal that gamma-glutamyl hydrolase suppresses glycolysis in colon cancer. Front Immunol. 13, 979521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.979521 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Deng, W., Zhu, P., Xu, H., Hou, X. & Chen, W. Classification and prognostic characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma based on glycolysis cholesterol synthesis axis. J. Oncol. 2022, 2014625. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2014625 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Karasinska, J. M. et al. Altered gene expression along the glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis is associated with outcome in pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1543 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yuan, Y., Song, J. & Wu, Q. Aberrant gene expression pattern in the glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis is linked with immune infiltration and prognosis in prostate cancer: A bioinformatics analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 101, e31416. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031416 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wettersten, H. I., Aboud, O. A., Lara, P. N. Jr. & Weiss, R. H. Metabolic reprogramming in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 13, 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.59 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Matsukawa, T. et al. ANGPTL8 links inflammation and poor differentiation, which are characteristics of malignant renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 114, 1410–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15700 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, Y. C., Hsieh, C. L., Huang, B. M. & Chen, Y. C. Induction of mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis by essential oil of Toona sinensis root through Akt, mTOR and NF-kappaB signalling pathways in human renal cell carcinoma cells. J. Food Drug Anal. 29, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.3367 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Luebke, T. et al. c-FLIP and CD95 signaling are essential for survival of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 10, 384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1609-y (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, W. et al. OTUD1 stabilizes PTEN to inhibit the PI3K/AKT and TNF-alpha/NF-kappaB signaling pathways and sensitize ccRCC to TKIs. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 1401–1414. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.68980 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, S. et al. Icaritin inhibits JAK/STAT3 signaling and growth of renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One 8, 181657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081657 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xiao, C. et al. RNF7 inhibits apoptosis and sunitinib sensitivity and promotes glycolysis in renal cell carcinoma via the SOCS1/JAK/STAT3 feedback loop. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 27, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-022-00337-55 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hoesel, B. & Schmid, J. A. The complexity of NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Mol. Cancer 12, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-12-86 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, H., Lee, H., Herrmann, A., Buettner, R. & Jove, R. Revisiting STAT3 signalling in cancer: new and unexpected biological functions. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3818 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chang, Y. et al. Systemic inflammation score predicts postoperative prognosis of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 113, 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.241 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, H. et al. Prognostic value of preoperative NLR, dNLR, PLR and CRP in surgical renal cell carcinoma patients. World J. Urol. 35, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1864-9 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, Q. et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol. Oncol. 32(50), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.016 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Marozzi, M. et al. Inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and proteostasis in tumor microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22158102 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Q. et al. NF-kappaB and pSTAT3 synergistically drive G6PD overexpression and facilitate sensitivity to G6PD inhibition in ccRCC. Cancer Cell Int. 20, 483. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01576-2 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Peng, J. et al. Stabilization of MCRS1 by BAP1 prevents chromosome instability in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 369, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.013 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pena-Llopis, S. et al. BAP1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 44, 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2323 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dalgliesh, G. L. et al. Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes. Nature 463, 360–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08672 (2010).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Capitanio, U. et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 75, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.0365 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ismail, I. H. et al. Germline mutations in BAP1 impair its function in DNA double-strand break repair. Cancer Res. 74, 4282–4294. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3109r (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Carvalho, S. et al. SETD2 is required for DNA double-strand break repair and activation of the p53-mediated checkpoint. Elife 3, e02482. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02482 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, F. et al. The histone mark H3K36me3 regulates human DNA mismatch repair through its interaction with MutSalpha. Cell 153, 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.025 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Colaprico, A. et al. TCGAbiolinks: An R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. Nucl. Acids Res. 44, 171. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1507 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sato, Y. et al. Integrated molecular analysis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 45, 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2699 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, G. et al. Integrated exome and RNA sequencing of TFE3-translocation renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 12, 5262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25618-z (2021).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hovelson, D. H. et al. Characterization of ADME gene variation in 21 populations by exome sequencing. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 27, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000260 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mayakonda, A., Lin, D. C., Assenov, Y., Plass, C. & Koeffler, H. P. Maftools: Efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 28, 1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.239244.118 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mermel, C. H. et al. GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol. 12, 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-r41 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wilkerson, M. D. & Hayes, D. N. ConsensusClusterPlus: A class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics 26, 1572–1573. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq170 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Archer, T. C. et al. Proteomics, post-translational modifications, and integrative analyses reveal molecular heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 34, 396-410 e398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.004 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xu, T. et al. CancerSubtypes: An R/Bioconductor package for molecular cancer subtype identification, validation and visualization. Bioinformatics 33, 3131–3133. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx378 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, J. et al. A novel immune-related lncRNA pair signature for prognostic prediction and immune response evaluation in gastric cancer: a bioinformatics and biological validation study. Cancer Cell Int. 22, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02493-25 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Blanche, P., Dartigues, J. F. & Jacqmin-Gadda, H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat. Med. 32, 5381–5397. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5958 (2013).ArticleÂ
MathSciNetÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mogensen, U. B., Ishwaran, H. & Gerds, T. A. Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves. J. Stat. Softw. 50, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v050.i11 (2012).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucl. Acids Res 51, D587–D592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac963 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28, 1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3715 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucl. Acids Res 28, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hanzelmann, S., Castelo, R. & Guinney, J. GSVA: Gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 14, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-7 (2013).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lauss, M. et al. Mutational and putative neoantigen load predict clinical benefit of adoptive T cell therapy in melanoma. Nat. Commun. 8, 1738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01460-0 (2017).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, P. L. et al. Analysis of immune signatures in longitudinal tumor samples yields insight into biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Discov. 6, 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1545 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mariathasan, S. et al. TGFbeta attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 554, 544–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25501 (2018).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sturm, G., Finotello, F. & List, M. Immunedeconv: An R package for unified access to computational methods for estimating immune cell fractions from bulk RNA-sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2120, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0327-7_16 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kim, J. et al. Invasive bladder cancer: Genomic insights and therapeutic promise. Clin. Cancer Res 21, 4514–4524. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1215 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12477 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gaujoux, R. & Seoighe, C. A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinform. 11, 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-367 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Manders, F. et al. MutationalPatterns: The one stop shop for the analysis of mutational processes. BMC Genom. 23, 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08357-3 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, W. C. et al. Multiomics profiling of primary lung cancers and distant metastases reveals immunosuppression as a common characteristic of tumor cells with metastatic plasticity. Genome Biol. 21, 271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02175-0 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ye, Z. et al. Prevalent homozygous deletions of type I interferon and defensin genes in human cancers associate with immunotherapy resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 3299–3308. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3008 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sinha, R. et al. Analysis of renal cancer cell lines from two major resources enables genomics-guided cell line selection. Nat. Commun. 8, 15165. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15165 (2017).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Abkevich, V. et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 107, 1776–1782. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.451 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Popova, T. et al. Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res. 72, 5454–5462. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1470 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Birkbak, N. J. et al. Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Discov. 2, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0206 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Marquard, A. M. et al. Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs. Biomark Res. 3, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-015-0033-4 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rees, M. G. et al. Correlating chemical sensitivity and basal gene expression reveals mechanism of action. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1986 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, C. et al. High-throughput identification of genotype-specific cancer vulnerabilities in mixtures of barcoded tumor cell lines. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3460 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yang, C. et al. Prognosis and personalized treatment prediction in TP53-mutant hepatocellular carcinoma: An in silico strategy towards precision oncology. Brief Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa164 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ghandi, M. et al. Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Nature 569, 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1186-3 (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maeser, D., Gruener, R. F. & Huang, R. S. Oncopredict: an R package for predicting in vivo or cancer patient drug response and biomarkers from cell line screening data. Brief Bioinform https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab260 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ