Kahrl, A. F., Snook, R. R. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. Fertilization mode drives sperm length evolution across the animal tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1153–1164 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gage, M. J. Sperm size evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1064–1065 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lüpold, S. & Pitnick, S. Sperm form and function: what do we know about the role of sexual selection? Reproduction 155, R229–R243 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pitnick, S., Hosken, D. J. & Birkhead, T. R. in Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective Ch. 3, 88–89 (Academic Press, 2009).Kahrl, A. F., Snook, R. R. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. Fertilization mode differentially impacts the evolution of vertebrate sperm components. Nat. Commun. 13, 6809 (2022).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Parker, G. A., Immler, S., Pitnick, S. & Birkhead, T. R. Sperm competition games: sperm size (mass) and number under raffle and displacement, and the evolution of P2. J. Theor. Biol. 264, 1003–1023 (2010).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Parker, G. A. Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 242, 120–126 (1990).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Parker, G. A. & Begon, M. E. Sperm competition games: sperm size and number under gametic control. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 253, 255–262 (1993).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lüpold, S., de Boer, R. A., Evans, J. P., Tomkins, J. L. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. How sperm competition shapes the evolution of testes and sperm: a meta-analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20200064 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Snook, R. R. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 46–53 (2005).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Immler, S. et al. Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5325–5330 (2011).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lupold, S., Calhim, S., Immler, S. & Birkhead, T. R. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 276, 1175–1181 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gomendio, M. & Roldan, E. R. Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52, 439–447 (2008).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lupold, S. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. Sperm number trumps sperm size in mammalian ejaculate evolution. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 282, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2122 (2015).Healy, K., Ezard, T. H. G., Jones, O. R., Salguero-Gomez, R. & Buckley, Y. M. Animal life history is shaped by the pace of life and the distribution of age-specific mortality and reproduction. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1217–1224 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
White, E. P., Ernest, S. K., Kerkhoff, A. J. & Enquist, B. J. Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 323–330 (2007).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Szekely, P., Korem, Y., Moran, U., Mayo, A. & Alon, U. The mass-longevity triangle: Pareto optimality and the geometry of life-history trait space. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004524 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H. & Rudder, B. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269, 797–800 (1977).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Carranza, J. Sexual selection for male body mass and the evolution of litter size in mammals. Am. Nat. 148, 81–100 (1996).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lupold, S., Tomkins, J. L., Simmons, L. W. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. Female monopolization mediates the relationship between pre- and postcopulatory sexual traits. Nat. Commun. 5, 3184 (2015).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jarvis, G. C. & Marshall, D. J. Fertilization mode covaries with body size. Am. Nat. 202, 448–457 (2023).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Werner, J. & Griebeler, E. M. Reproductive biology and its impact on body size: comparative analysis of mammalian, avian and dinosaurian reproduction. PLoS ONE 6, e28442 (2011).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Barneche, D. R., Robertson, D. R., White, C. R. & Marshall, D. Fish reproductive-energy output increases disproportionately with body size. Science 360, 642–645 (2018).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liao, W. B. et al. Ejaculate evolution in external fertilizers: influenced by sperm competition or sperm limitation? Evolution 72, 4–17 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Stockley, P., Gage, M. J., Parker, G. A. & Moller, A. P. Female reproductive biology and the coevolution of ejaculate characteristics in fish. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 263, 451–458 (1996).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Emerson, S. B. Testis size variation in frogs: testing the alternatives. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 227–235 (1997).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Byrne, P. G., Simmons, L. W. & Roberts, J. D. Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 270, 2079–2086 (2003).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Furness, A. I., Venditti, C. & Capellini, I. Terrestrial reproduction and parental care drive rapid evolution in the trade-off between offspring size and number across amphibians. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001495 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Birkhead, T. & Moller, A. P. Numbers and size of sperm storage tubules and the duration of sperm storage in birds: a comparative study. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45, 363–372 (1992).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kleven, O. et al. Comparative evidence for the evolution of sperm swimming speed by sperm competition and female sperm storage duration in passerine birds. Evolution 63, 2466–2473 (2009).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Briskie, J. V., Montgomerie, R. & Birkhead, T. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51, 937–945 (1997).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Meiri, S. et al. Different solutions lead to similar life history traits across the great divides of the amniote tree of life. J. Biol. Res. 28, 3 (2021).
Google ScholarÂ
Kozlowski, J., Konarzewski, M. & Czarnoleski, M. Coevolution of body size and metabolic rate in vertebrates: a life-history perspective. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 95, 1393–1417 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Makarieva, A. M. et al. Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life’s major domains: evidence for life’s metabolic optimum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16994–16999 (2008).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gomendio, M., Tourmente, M. & Roldan, E. R. Why mammalian lineages respond differently to sexual selection: metabolic rate constrains the evolution of sperm size. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 278, 3135–3141 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tourmente, M. & Roldan, E. R. Mass-specific metabolic rate influences sperm performance through energy production in mammals. PLoS ONE 10, e0138185 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tourmente, M., Gomendio, M. & Roldan, E. R. Mass-specific metabolic rate and sperm competition determine sperm size in marsupial mammals. PLoS ONE 6, e21244 (2011).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tang, Y., Mai, C. L., Yu, J. P. & Li, D. Y. Investigating the role of life-history traits in mammalian genomes. Anim. Biol. 70, 121–130 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Turner, J. J., Ewald, J. C. & Skotheim, J. M. Cell size control in yeast. Curr. Biol. 22, R350–R359 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cavalier-Smith, T. Skeletal DNA and the evolution of genome size. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 11, 273–302 (1982).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gregory, T. R. & Hebert, P. D. N. The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Genome Res. 9, 317–324 (1999).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cavalier-Smith, T. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann. Bot. 95, 147–175 (2005).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Glazier, D. S. Genome size covaries more positively with propagule size than adult size: new insights into an old problem. Biology 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040270 (2021).Gage, M. J. G. Mammalian sperm morphometry. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 265, 97–103 (1998).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gardner, J. D., Laurin, M. & Organ, C. L. The relationship between genome size and metabolic rate in extant vertebrates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190146 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Adler, M., Korem Kohanim, Y., Tendler, A., Mayo, A. & Alon, U. Continuum of gene-expression profiles provides spatial division of labor within a differentiated cell type. Cell Syst. 8, 43–52.e45 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hart, Y. et al. Inferring biological tasks using Pareto analysis of high-dimensional data. Nat. Methods 12, 233–235 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hausser, J. et al. Tumor diversity and the trade-off between universal cancer tasks. Nat. Commun. 10, 5423 (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Koçillari, L., Fariselli, P., Trovato, A., Seno, F. & Maritan, A. Signature of Pareto optimization in the Escherichia coli proteome. Sci. Rep. 8, 9141 (2018).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shoval, O. et al. Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space. Science 336, 1157–1160 (2012).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kavanagh, K. D. et al. Developmental bias in the evolution of phalanges. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18190–18195 (2013).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schuech, R., Hoehfurtner, T., Smith, D. J. & Humphries, S. Motile curved bacteria are Pareto-optimal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14440–14447 (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tendler, A., Mayo, A. & Alon, U. Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells. BMC Syst. Biol. 9, 12 (2015).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Koçillari, L. et al. The Widened Pipe Model of plant hydraulic evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100314118 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pallasdies, F., Norton, P., Schleimer, J. H. & Schreiber, S. Neural optimization: understanding trade-offs with Pareto theory. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 71, 84–91 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jedlicka, P., Bird, A. D. & Cuntz, H. Pareto optimality, economy-effectiveness trade-offs and ion channel degeneracy: improving population modelling for single neurons. Open Biol. 12, 220073 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Karolis, V. R., Corbetta, M. & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. The architecture of functional lateralisation and its relationship to callosal connectivity in the human brain. Nat. Commun. 10, 1417 (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cona, G. et al. Archetypes of human cognition defined by time preference for reward and their brain correlates: An evolutionary trade-off approach. Neuroimage 185, 322–334 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alon, U. An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2019).Fitzpatrick, J. L., Kahrl, A. F. & Snook, R. R. SpermTree, a species-level database of sperm morphology spanning the animal tree of life. Sci. Data 9, 30 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mørup, M. & Hansen, L. K. Archetypal analysis for machine learning and data mining. Neurocomputing 80, 54–63 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bioucas-Dias, J. M. A variable splitting augmented Lagrangian approach to linear spectral unmixing. 2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289072 (2009).Stockley, P., Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A. & Moller, A. P. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149, 933–954 (1997).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Adler, M. et al. Controls for phylogeny and robust analysis in Pareto task inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab297 (2021).Gomendio, M. & Roldan, E. R. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc. Biol. Sci. / R. Soc. 243, 181–185, (1991).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bennett, M. D. The duration of meiosis. Proc. Biol. Sci./ R. Soc. 178, 277–299 (1971).ADSÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Friedländer, M., Seth, R. K. & Reynolds, S. E. Eupyrene and Apyrene Sperm: Dichotomous Spermatogenesis in Lepidoptera. Adv. Insect Physiol. 32, 206–308 (2005).Walmsley, S. F. & Morrissey, M. B. Causation, not collinearity: identifying sources of bias when modelling the evolution of brain size and other allometric traits. Evol. Lett. 6, 234–244 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Baker, J., Humphries, S., Ferguson-Gow, H., Meade, A. & Venditti, C. Rapid decreases in relative testes mass among monogamous birds but not in other vertebrates. Ecol. Lett. 23, 283–292 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gregory, T. R. Animal Genome Size Database. http://www.genomesize.com (2005).Etard, A. et al. Global gaps in trait data for terrestrial vertebrates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 2143–2158 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Oliveira, B. F., Sao-Pedro, V. A., Santos-Barrera, G., Penone, C. & Costa, G. C. AmphiBIO, a global database for amphibian ecological traits. Sci. Data 4, 170123 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
de Magalhaes, J. P. & Costa, J. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J. Evolut. Biol. 22, 1770–1774 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hinchliff, C. E. et al. Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12764–12769 (2015).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Michonneau, F., Brown, J. W., Winter, D. J. & Fitzjohn, R. rotl: an R package to interact with the Open Tree of Life data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1476–1481 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Eastman, J. M. et al. Congruification: support for time scaling large phylogenetic trees. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 688–691 (2013).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Britton, T., Anderson, C. L., Jacquet, D., Lundqvist, S. & Bremer, K. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 56, 741–752 (2007).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Harmon, L. J., Weir, J. T., Brock, C. D., Glor, R. E. & Challenger, W. GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24, 129–131 (2008).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hedges, S. B., Marin, J., Suleski, M., Paymer, M. & Kumar, S. Tree of life reveals clock-like speciation and diversification. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 835–845 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Koçillari, L. et al. Tetrapod sperm length evolution in relation to body mass is shaped by multiple trade-offs. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11621774 (2024).