Isayev, O. et al. Universal fragment descriptors for predicting properties of inorganic crystals. Nat. Commun. 8, 15679 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mikulskis, P., Alexander, M. R. & Winkler, D. A. Toward interpretable machine learning models for materials discovery. Adv. Intell. Syst. 1, 1900045 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pilania, G. Machine learning in materials science: from explainable predictions to autonomous design. Comput. Mater. Sci. 193, 110360 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ouyang, R., Curtarolo, S., Ahmetcik, E., Scheffler, M. & Ghiringhelli, L. M. Sisso: a compressed-sensing method for identifying the best low-dimensional descriptor in an immensity of offered candidates. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 083802 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jha, D. et al. Elemnet: deep learning the chemistry of materials from only elemental composition. Sci. Rep. 8, 17593 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nandy, A. et al. Computational discovery of transition-metal complexes: from high-throughput screening to machine learning. Chem. Rev. 121, 9927–10000 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Keith, J. A. et al. Combining machine learning and computational chemistry for predictive insights into chemical systems. Chem. Rev. 121, 9816–9872 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhuo, Y., Mansouri Tehrani, A. & Brgoch, J. Predicting the band gaps of inorganic solids by machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. 9, 1668–1673 (2018).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Smith, J. S., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost. Chem. Sci. 8, 3192–3203 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Faber, F. A., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A. & Armiento, R. Machine learning energies of 2 million elpasolite (ABC2D6) crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 135502 (2016).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Magedov, S., Koh, C., Malone, W., Lubbers, N. & Nebgen, B. Bond order predictions using deep neural networks. J. Appl. Phys. 129, 064701 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nandi, S., Vegge, T. & Bhowmik, A. Multixc-qm9: large dataset of molecular and reaction energies from multi-level quantum chemical methods. Sci. Data 10, 783 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Smith, J. S. et al. The ani-1ccx and ani-1x data sets, coupled-cluster and density functional theory properties for molecules. Sci. Data 7, 134 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Axelrod, S. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. GEOM, energy-annotated molecular conformations for property prediction and molecular generation. Sci. Data 9, 185 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hoja, J. et al. Qm7-x, a comprehensive dataset of quantum-mechanical properties spanning the chemical space of small organic molecules. Sci. Data 8, 43 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Isert, C., Atz, K., Jiménez-Luna, J. & Schneider, G. Qmugs, quantum mechanical properties of drug-like molecules. Sci. Data 9, 273 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schreiner, M., Bhowmik, A., Vegge, T., Busk, J. & Winther, O. Transition1x – a dataset for building generalizable reactive machine learning potentials. Sci. Data 9, 779 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K.-R. & Tkatchenko, A. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 13890 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Behler, J. Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074106–14 (2011).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Unke, O. T. et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mueller, T., Hernandez, A. & Wang, C. Machine learning for interatomic potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 050902 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bartók, A. P., Kermode, J., Bernstein, N. & Csányi, G. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041048 (2018).
Google ScholarÂ
Noé, F., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & Clementi, C. Machine learning for molecular simulation. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71, 361–390 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Frenkel, D. & Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulation 2nd edn (Academic Press, Inc., USA, 2001).Weiner, S. J. et al. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 765–784 (1984).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jorgensen, W. L. & Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 1657–1666 (1988).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bartlett, R. J. & MusiaÅ‚, M. Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 291–352 (2007).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tran, R. et al. The open catalyst 2022 (oc22) dataset and challenges for oxide electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 13, 3066–3084 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Smith, J. S. et al. Approaching coupled cluster accuracy with a general-purpose neural network potential through transfer learning. Nat. Commun. 10, 2903 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, M. S. et al. Data-efficient machine learning potentials from transfer learning of periodic correlated electronic structure methods: Liquid water at AFQMC, CCSD, and CCSD(T) accuracy. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 4510–4519 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Taylor, M. E. & Stone, P. Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1633–1685 (2009).
Google ScholarÂ
Pan, S. J. & Yang, Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22, 1345–1359 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zaverkin, V., Holzmüller, D., Bonfirraro, L. & Kästner, J. Transfer learning for chemically accurate interatomic neural network potentials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 5383–5396 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kovács, D. P. et al. Linear atomic cluster expansion force fields for organic molecules: Beyond RMSE. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 7696–7711 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Finn, C., Abbeel, P. & Levine, S. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1126–1135 (2017).Hospedales, T., Antoniou, A., Micaelli, P. & Storkey, A. Meta-learning in neural networks: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 5149–5169 (2022).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nichol, A., Achiam, J. & Schulman, J. On first-order meta-learning algorithms. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.02999 (2018).Huisman, M., van Rijn, J. N. & Plaat, A. A survey of deep meta-learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 4483–4541 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bommasani, R.et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258 (2022).OpenAI. GPT-4 technical report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023).Cole, D., Mones, L. & Csányi, G. A machine learning based intramolecular potential for a flexible organic molecule. Faraday Discuss. 224, 247–264 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
St. John, P. C., Guan, Y., Kim, Y., Kim, S. & Paton, R. S. Prediction of organic homolytic bond dissociation enthalpies at near chemical accuracy with sub-second computational cost. Nat. Commun. 11, 2328 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shao, Y., Dietrich, F. M., Nettelblad, C. & Zhang, C. Training algorithm matters for the performance of neural network potential: A case study of adam and the kalman filter optimizers. J. Chem. Phys. 155, 204108 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fu, X.et al. Forces are not enough: Benchmark and critical evaluation for machine learning force fields with molecular simulations., Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2835–8856, (2023)Han, X. et al. Pre-trained models: Past, present and future. AI Open 2, 225–250 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu*, W.et al. Strategies for pre-training graph neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2020). https://openreview.net/forum?id=HJlWWJSFDH.Hendrycks, D., Lee, K. & Mazeika, M. Using pre-training can improve model robustness and uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97, 2712–2721 (PMLR, 2019).Sun, Y. et al. Fingerprinting diverse nanoporous materials for optimal hydrogen storage conditions using meta-learning. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg3983 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nie, J., Wang, N., Li, J., Wang, K. & Wang, H. Meta-learning prediction of physical and chemical properties of magnetized water and fertilizer based on lstm. Plant Methods 17, 119 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, J., Zheng, S., Chen, J. & Yang, Y. Meta learning for low-resource molecular optimization. J. Chem. Inf. 61, 1627–1636 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules. Sci. Data 1, 140022 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Batzner, S. et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lubbers, N., Smith, J. S. & Barros, K. Hierarchical modeling of molecular energies using a deep neural network. J. Chem. Phys. 148, (2018).Neese, F., Wennmohs, F., Becker, U. & Riplinger, C. The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 224108 (2020).Frisch, M. J.et al. Gaussian 16 Revision C.01. (Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT, 2016).Nakata, M., Shimazaki, T., Hashimoto, M. & Maeda, T. Pubchemqc pm6: data sets of 221 million molecules with optimized molecular geometries and electronic properties. J. Chem. Inf. 60, 5891–5899 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yao, K., Herr, J. E., Toth, D., Mckintyre, R. & Parkhill, J. The tensormol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics. Chem. Sci. 9, 2261–2269 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Smith, J. S., Nebgen, B., Lubbers, N., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241733 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ