Liu, Y., Beyer, A. & Aebersold, R. On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance. Cell 165, 535–550 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fortelny, N., Overall, C. M., Pavlidis, P. & Freue, G. V. C. Can we predict protein from mRNA levels? Nature 547, E19–E20 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buccitelli, C. & Selbach, M. mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 630–644 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Franks, A., Airoldi, E. & Slavov, N. Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005535 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Edfors, F. et al. Gene-specific correlation of RNA and protein levels in human cells and tissues. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 883 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ward, L. D. & Kellis, M. Interpreting noncoding genetic variation in complex traits and human disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1095–1106 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tak, Y. G. & Farnham, P. J. Making sense of GWAS: using epigenomics and genome engineering to understand the functional relevance of SNPs in non-coding regions of the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 8, 57 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Võsa, U. et al. Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression. Nat. Genet. 53, 1300–1310 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kerimov, N. et al. A compendium of uniformly processed human gene expression and splicing quantitative trait loci. Nat. Genet. 53, 1290–1299 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
GTEx Consortium The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Connally, N. J. et al. The missing link between genetic association and regulatory function. eLife 11, e74970 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huang, D. et al. QTLbase2: an enhanced catalog of human quantitative trait loci on extensive molecular phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1122–D1128 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Alberts, B. et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, 2002).Khan, Z. et al. Primate transcript and protein expression levels evolve under compensatory selection pressures. Science 342, 1100–1104 (2013).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Battle, A. et al. Genomic variation. Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein. Science 347, 664–667 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. S. & Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218–223 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Brar, G. A. & Weissman, J. S. Ribosome profiling reveals the what, when, where and how of protein synthesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 651–664 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Witte, F. et al. A trans locus causes a ribosomopathy in hypertrophic hearts that affects mRNA translation in a protein length-dependent fashion. Genome Biol. 22, 191 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, Q. et al. Genome-wide search for exonic variants affecting translational efficiency. Nat. Commun. 4, 2260 (2013).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Long, E., Wan, P., Chen, Q., Lu, Z. & Choi, J. From function to translation: decoding genetic susceptibility to human diseases via artificial intelligence. Cell Genomics 3, 100320 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Eraslan, G., Avsec, Ž., Gagneur, J. & Theis, F. J. Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 389–403 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huang, X., Rymbekova, A., Dolgova, O., Lao, O. & Kuhlwilm, M. Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 61–78 (2023).Acosta, J. N., Falcone, G. J., Rajpurkar, P. & Topol, E. J. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat. Med. 28, 1773–1784 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cui, H., Hu, H., Zeng, J. & Chen, T. DeepShape: estimating isoform-level ribosome abundance and distribution with Ribo-seq data. BMC Bioinf. 20, 678 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, H. et al. Riboexp: an interpretable reinforcement learning framework for ribosome density modeling. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa412 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tunney, R. et al. Accurate design of translational output by a neural network model of ribosome distribution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 577–582 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shao, B. et al. Riboformer: a deep learning framework for predicting context-dependent translation dynamics. Nat. Commun. 15, 2011 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tian, T., Li, S., Lang, P., Zhao, D. & Zeng, J. Full-length ribosome density prediction by a multi-input and multi-output model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008842 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).Imataka, H., Gradi, A. & Sonenberg, N. A newly identified N-terminal amino acid sequence of human eIF4G binds poly(A)-binding protein and functions in poly(A)-dependent translation. EMBO J. 17, 7480–7489 (1998).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wells, S. E., Hillner, P. E., Vale, R. D. & Sachs, A. B. Circularization of mRNA by eukaryotic translation initiation factors. Mol. Cell 2, 135–140 (1998).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tarun, S. Z. Jr & Sachs, A. B. Association of the yeast poly(A) tail binding protein with translation initiation factor eIF-4G. EMBO J. 15, 7168–7177 (1996).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Castillo Bennett, J., Roggero, C. M., Mancifesta, F. E. & Mayorga, L. S. Calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of synaptotagmin VI is necessary for acrosomal exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 26269–26278 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Roggero, C. M. et al. Protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of the two polybasic regions of synaptotagmin VI regulates their function in acrosomal exocytosis. Dev. Biol. 285, 422–435 (2005).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Umezu, T., Yamanouchi, H., Iida, Y., Miura, M. & Tomooka, Y. Follistatin-like-1, a diffusible mesenchymal factor determines the fate of epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4601–4606 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Geng, Y. et al. Follistatin-like 1 (Fstl1) is a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 4 signaling antagonist in controlling mouse lung development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7058–7063 (2011).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, W. et al. FSTL1 promotes alveolar epithelial cell aging and worsens pulmonary fibrosis by affecting SENP1-mediated DeSUMOylation. Cell Biol. Int. 47, 1716–1727 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cockman, E., Anderson, P. & Ivanov, P. TOP mRNPs: molecular mechanisms and principles of regulation. Biomolecules 10, 969 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Meyuhas, O. Synthesis of the translational apparatus is regulated at the translational level. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6321–6330 (2000).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kozak, M. The scanning model for translation: an update. J. Cell Biol. 108, 229–241 (1989).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kozak, M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44, 283–292 (1986).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tuller, T. et al. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141, 344–354 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Verma, M. et al. A short translational ramp determines the efficiency of protein synthesis. Nat. Commun. 10, 5774 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rhead, B. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D613–D619 (2010).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, L. et al. Predicting dynamic cellular protein-RNA interactions by deep learning using in vivo RNA structures. Cell Res. 31, 495–516 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Siepel, A., Pollard, K. S. & Haussler, D. New methods for detecting lineage-specific selection. in Research in Computational Molecular Biology 190–205 (Springer, 2006).Josephs, E. B., Lee, Y. W., Stinchcombe, J. R. & Wright, S. I. Association mapping reveals the role of purifying selection in the maintenance of genomic variation in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15390–15395 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Park, C. Y. et al. Genome-wide landscape of RNA-binding protein target site dysregulation reveals a major impact on psychiatric disorder risk. Nat. Genet. 53, 166–173 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: improvements to accessing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D835–D844 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Turco, E. et al. Reconstitution defines the roles of p62, NBR1 and TAX1BP1 in ubiquitin condensate formation and autophagy initiation. Nat. Commun. 12, 5212 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bjørkøy, G. et al. p62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J. Cell Biol. 171, 603–614 (2005).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rubino, E. et al. SQSTM1 mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 79, 1556–1562 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ma, S., Attarwala, I. Y. & Xie, X.-Q. SQSTM1/p62: a potential target for neurodegenerative disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10, 2094–2114 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lin, F. & Worman, H. J. Structural organization of the human gene encoding nuclear lamin A and nuclear lamin C. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16321–16326 (1993).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kamat, A. K., Rocchi, M., Smith, D. I. & Miller, O. J. Lamin A/C gene and a related sequence map to human chromosomes 1q12.1-q23 and 10. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 19, 203–208 (1993).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tan, J. et al. Cell-type-specific prediction of 3D chromatin organization enables high-throughput in silico genetic screening. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1140–1150 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yin, Q., Wu, M., Liu, Q., Lv, H. & Jiang, R. DeepHistone: a deep learning approach to predicting histone modifications. BMC Genomics 20, 193 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, Z. et al. Applications of deep learning in understanding gene regulation. Cell Rep. Methods 3, 100384 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Matsumoto, K., Wassarman, K. M. & Wolffe, A. P. Nuclear history of a pre-mRNA determines the translational activity of cytoplasmic mRNA. EMBO J. 17, 2107–2121 (1998).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nott, A., Meislin, S. H. & Moore, M. J. A quantitative analysis of intron effects on mammalian gene expression. RNA 9, 607–617 (2003).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gudikote, J. P., Imam, J. S., Garcia, R. F. & Wilkinson, M. F. RNA splicing promotes translation and RNA surveillance. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 801–809 (2005).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Moore, M. J. & Proudfoot, N. J. Pre-mRNA processing reaches back to transcription and ahead to translation. Cell 136, 688–700 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shaul, O. How introns enhance gene expression. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 91, 145–155 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pamudurti, N. R. et al. Translation of circRNAs. Mol. Cell 66, 9–21.E7 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jacob, A. G. & Smith, C. W. J. Intron retention as a component of regulated gene expression programs. Hum. Genet. 136, 1043–1057 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Legnini, I. et al. Circ-ZNF609 Is a circular RNA that can be translated and functions in myogenesis. Mol. Cell 66, 22–37.E9 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sinha, T., Panigrahi, C., Das, D. & Chandra Panda, A. Circular RNA translation, a path to hidden proteome. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: RNA 13, e1685 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hwang, H. J. & Kim, Y. K. Molecular mechanisms of circular RNA translation. Exp. Mol. Med. 56, 1272–1280 (2024).Gjoneska, E. et al. Conserved epigenomic signals in mice and humans reveal immune basis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 518, 365–369 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
RamÃrez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P. & Kundaje, A. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In Proc. 34th International Conference on Machine Learning 70, 3145–3153 (PMLR, 2017).Edgar, R., Domrachev, M. & Lash, A. E. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 207–210 (2002).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
He, J. Example data and pretrained Translatomer model. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13751434 (2024).He, J. xiongxslab:Translatomer. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13777392 (2024).