Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas. Elife 6, e27041 (2017).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Domínguez Conde, C. et al. Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans. Science 376, eabl5197 (2022).Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O. et al. The human tumor atlas network: charting tumor transitions across space and time at single-cell resolution. Cell 181, 236–249 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Eraslan, G. et al. Single-nucleus cross-tissue molecular reference maps toward understanding disease gene function. Science 376, eabl4290 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
The Tabula Sapiens Consortium A multiple-organ, single-cell transcriptomic atlas of humans. Science 376, eabl4896 (2022).Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Karlsson, M. et al. A single–cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh2169 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Brock, A., Chang, H. & Huang, S. Non-genetic heterogeneity—a mutation-independent driving force for the somatic evolution of tumours. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 336–342 (2009).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Burrell, R. A., McGranahan, N., Bartek, J. & Swanton, C. The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Nature 501, 338–345 (2013).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Koren, S. & Bentires-Alj, M. Breast tumor heterogeneity: source of fitness, hurdle for therapy. Mol. Cell 60, 537–546 (2015).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lindström, L. S. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of the estrogen receptor and the long-term risk of fatal breast cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 726–733 (2018).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lawson, D. A., Kessenbrock, K., Davis, R. T., Pervolarakis, N. & Werb, Z. Tumour heterogeneity and metastasis at single-cell resolution. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1349–1360 (2018).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Karaayvaz, M. et al. Unravelling subclonal heterogeneity and aggressive disease states in TNBC through single-cell RNA-seq. Nat. Commun. 9, 3588 (2018).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dave, A. et al. The breast cancer single-cell atlas: defining cellular heterogeneity within model cell lines and primary tumors to inform disease subtype, stemness, and treatment options. Cell Oncol. 46, 603–628 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kinker, G. S. et al. Pan-cancer single-cell RNA-seq identifies recurring programs of cellular heterogeneity. Nat. Genet. 52, 1208–1218 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chang, C. A. et al. Ontogeny and vulnerabilities of drug-tolerant persisters in HER2+ breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 12, 1022–1045 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pisco, A. O. et al. Non-Darwinian dynamics in therapy-induced cancer drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 4, 2467 (2013).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Howard, G. R., Johnson, K. E., Rodriguez Ayala, A., Yankeelov, T. E. & Brock, A. A multi-state model of chemoresistance to characterize phenotypic dynamics in breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 8, 12058 (2018).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ranjan, B. et al. DUBStepR is a scalable correlation-based feature selection method for accurately clustering single-cell data. Nat. Commun. 12, 5849 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. M. & Kramann, R. genesorteR: feature ranking in clustered single cell data. 676379 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/676379 (2019).Gregory, W., Sarwar, N., Kevrekidis, G., Villar, S. & Dumitrascu, B. MarkerMap: nonlinear marker selection for single-cell studies. npj Syst. Biol. Appl. 10, 1–12 (2024).Article
Google Scholar
Chen, X., Chen, S. & Thomson, M. Minimal gene set discovery in single-cell mRNA-seq datasets with ActiveSVM. Nat. Comput Sci. 2, 387–398 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nelson, M. E., Riva, S. G. & Cvejic, A. SMaSH: a scalable, general marker gene identification framework for single-cell RNA-sequencing. BMC Bioinform. 23, 328 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li, R., Banjanin, B., Schneider, R. K. & Costa, I. G. Detection of cell markers from single cell RNA-seq with sc2marker. BMC Bioinform. 23, 276 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Delaney, C. et al. Combinatorial prediction of marker panels from single-cell transcriptomic data. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e9005 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mazzara, S. et al. CombiROC: an interactive web tool for selecting accurate marker combinations of omics data. Sci. Rep. 7, 45477 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Buccitelli, C. & Selbach, M. mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 630–644 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schukken, K. M. & Sheltzer, J. M. Extensive protein dosage compensation in aneuploid human cancers. Genome Res. 32, 1254–1270 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Xu, Y.-Y., Zhou, H., Murphy, R. F. & Shen, H.-B. Consistency and variation of protein subcellular location annotations. Proteins 89, 242 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ramdas, A., Garcia, N. & Cuturi, M. On Wasserstein two sample testing and related families of nonparametric tests. Entropy 19, 47 (2017).Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C. & Guibas, L. J. The Earth Mover’s Distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 40, 99–121 (2000).Meyer, E., Aglyamova, G. V. & Matz, M. V. Profiling gene expression responses of coral larvae (Acropora millepora) to elevated temperature and settlement inducers using a novel RNA-Seq procedure. Mol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05205.x (2011).Lohman, B. K., Weber, J. N. & Bolnick, D. I. Evaluation of TagSeq, a reliable low‐cost alternative for RNA seq. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 1315–1321 (2016).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hapach, L. A. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 81, 3649–3663 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hapach, L. A. et al. Phenotypically sorted highly and weakly migratory triple negative breast cancer cells exhibit migratory and metastatic commensalism. Breast Cancer Res. 25, 102 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Shen, Y. et al. Detecting heterogeneity in and between breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Converg. 4, 1 (2020).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sirois, I. et al. A unique morphological phenotype in chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer reveals metabolic reprogramming and PLIN4 expression as a molecular vulnerability. Mol. Cancer Res. 17, 2492–2507 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Enciso-Benavides, J. et al. Biological characteristics of a sub-population of cancer stem cells from two triple-negative breast tumour cell lines. Heliyon 7, e07273 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hu, Z. et al. The cancer surfaceome atlas integrates genomic, functional and drug response data to identify actionable targets. Nat. Cancer 2, 1406–1422 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pele, O. & Werman, M. Fast and robust Earth Mover’s Distances. in 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459199 (2009).Orlova, D. Y. et al. Earth Mover’s Distance (EMD): a true metric for comparing biomarker expression levels in cell populations. PLoS One 11, e0151859 (2016).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Flamary, R. et al. POT: python optimal transport. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22, 1–8 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bonneel, N., Rabin, J., Peyré, G. & Pfister, H. Sliced and radon wasserstein barycenters of measures. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 51, 22–45 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Peyré, G. & Cuturi, M. Computational Optimal Transport: With Applications to Data Science. FNT in Machine Learning 11, 355–607 (2019).Lakkis, J. et al. A multi-use deep learning method for CITE-seq and single-cell RNA-seq data integration with cell surface protein prediction and imputation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 940–952 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Xu, F., Wang, S., Dai, X., Mundra, P. A. & Zheng, J. Ensemble learning models that predict surface protein abundance from single-cell multimodal omics data. Methods 189, 65–73 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhou, S., Li, Y., Wu, W. & Li, L. scMMT: a multi-use deep learning approach for cell annotation, protein prediction and embedding in single-cell RNA-seq data. Brief. Bioinforma. 25, bbad523 (2024).Article
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Ye, C., Wang, J. & Zhang, N. R. Surface protein imputation from single cell transcriptomes by deep neural networks. Nat. Commun. 11, 651 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hu, C. et al. CellMarker 2.0: an updated database of manually curated cell markers in human/mouse and web tools based on scRNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D870–D876 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Azizi, E. et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell 174, 1293–1308.e36 (2018).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jiang, K., Dong, M., Li, C. & Sheng, J. Unraveling heterogeneity of tumor cells and microenvironment and its clinical implications for triple negative breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 11, 557477 (2021).Yang, E. Y., Howard, G. R., Brock, A., Yankeelov, T. E. & Lorenzo, G. Mathematical characterization of population dynamics in breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 972146 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Howard, G. R., Jost, T. A., Yankeelov, T. E. & Brock, A. Quantification of long-term doxorubicin response dynamics in breast cancer cell lines to direct treatment schedules. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009104 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Freischel, A. R. et al. Frequency-dependent interactions determine outcome of competition between two breast cancer cell lines. Sci. Rep. 11, 4908 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rodriguez Messan, M. et al. Predicting the results of competition between two breast cancer lines grown in 3-D spheroid culture. Math. Biosci. 336, 108575 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maltas, J. et al. Drug dependence in cancer is exploitable by optimally constructed treatment holidays. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 147–162 (2023).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nam, A. et al. Dynamic phenotypic switching and group behavior help non-small cell lung cancer cells evade chemotherapy. Biomolecules 12, 8 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kaznatcheev, A., Peacock, J., Basanta, D., Marusyk, A. & Scott, J. G. Fibroblasts and alectinib switch the evolutionary games played by non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 450–456 (2019).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gutierrez, C. et al. Multifunctional barcoding with ClonMapper enables high-resolution study of clonal dynamics during tumor evolution and treatment. Nat. Cancer 2, 758–772 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Heumos, L. et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 550–572 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Germain, P.-L., Lun, A., Meixide, C. G., Macnair, W. & Robinson, M. D. Doublet identification in single-cell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Res 10, 979 (2021).Tirosh, I. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq supports a developmental hierarchy in human oligodendroglioma. Nature 539, 309–313 (2016).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Patel, H. et al. nf-core/rnaseq: nf-core/rnaseq v3.14.0-Hassium Honey Badger. Zenodo, 10471647 https://github.com/nf-core/rnaseq?tab=readme-ov-file#citations (2024).Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar