Shilo, S., Rossman, H. & Segal, E. Axes of a revolution: challenges and promises of big data in healthcare. Nat. Med. 26, 29–38 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Obermeyer, Z. & Emanuel, E. J. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1216–1219 (2016).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marx, V. The big challenges of big data. Nature 498, 255–260 (2013).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.-Q. & Ding, W. Data mining with big data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26, 97–107 (2013).
Google Scholar
LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S. & Kruschwitz, N. Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 52, 21–32 (2011).
Google Scholar
Xing, L., Giger, M. L. & Min, J. K. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Technical Basis and Clinical Applications (Academic Press, 2020).Wee-Chung Liew, A., Yan, H. & Yang, M. Pattern recognition techniques for the emerging field of bioinformatics: a review. Pattern Recognit. 38, 2055–2073 (2005).Article
Google Scholar
Tang, B., Pan, Z., Yin, K. & Khateeb, A. Recent advances of deep learning in bioinformatics and computational biology. Front. Genet. 10, 214 (2019).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Karim, M. R. et al. Deep learning-based clustering approaches for bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 393–415 (2021).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kiselev, V. Y., Andrews, T. S. & Hemberg, M. Challenges in unsupervised clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 273–282 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A. & Wedderburn, R. W. M. Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 135, 370–384 (1972).Article
Google Scholar
Tolles, J. & Meurer, W. J. Logistic regression: relating patient characteristics to outcomes. JAMA 316, 533–534 (2016).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).Article
Google Scholar
Chen, T. &` Guestrin, C. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T. & Frey, B. J. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 831–838 (2015).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ronao, C. A. & Cho, S.-B. Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 59, 235–244 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Arik, S. Ö. & Pfister, T. Tabnet: attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 35, 6679–6687 (2021).Huang, X., Khetan, A., Cvitkovic, M. & Karnin, Z. Tabtransformer: tabular data modeling using contextual embeddings. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06678 (2020).Kadra, A., Lindauer, M., Hutter, F. & Grabocka, J. Well-tuned simple nets excel on tabular datasets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 23928–23941 (2021).
Google Scholar
Borisov, V. et al. Deep neural networks and tabular data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35, 7499–7519 (2022).Gorishniy, Y., Rubachev, I., Khrulkov, V. & Babenko, A. Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 18932–18943 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shwartz-Ziv, R. & Armon, A. Tabular data: deep learning is not all you need. Inf. Fusion 81, 84–90 (2022).Article
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. Converting tabular data into images for deep learning with convolutional neural networks. Sci. Rep. 11, 11325 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X. & Reyes-Ortiz, J. L. Human activity recognition on smartphones using a multiclass hardware-friendly support vector machine. In Ambient Assisted Living and Home Care. 4th International Workshop IWAAL 2012 (eds Bravo, J. et al.) 216–223 (Springer, 2012).Jayaram, N. & Baker, J. W. Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38, 1687–1708 (2009).Article
Google Scholar
ElShawi, R., Sherif, Y., Al-Mallah, M. & Sakr, S. Interpretability in healthcare: a comparative study of local machine learning interpretability techniques. Comput. Intell. 37, 1633–1650 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Tjoa, E. & Guan, C. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai): toward medical xai. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32, 4793–4813 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Yu, K.-H., Beam, A. L. & Kohane, I. S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 719–731 (2018).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shortliffe, E. H. & Sepúlveda, M. J. Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA 320, 2199–2200 (2018).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Vans, E., Shigemizu, D., Boroevich, K. A. & Tsunoda, T. Deepinsight: a methodology to transform a non-image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture. Sci. Rep. 9, 11399 (2019).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31, 4768–4777 (2017).Savas, P. et al. Single-cell profiling of breast cancer T cells reveals a tissue-resident memory subset associated with improved prognosis. Nat. Med. 24, 986–993 (2018).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jia, J., Li, H., Huang, Z., Yu, J. & Cao, B. Comprehensive immune landscape of lung-resident memory CD8+ T cells after influenza infection and reinfection in a mouse model. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1184884 (2023).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lelliott, E. J. et al. NKG7 enhances cd8+ T cell synapse efficiency to limit inflammation. Front. Immunol. 13, 931630 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wen, T. et al. NKG7 is a T-cell–intrinsic therapeutic target for improving antitumor cytotoxicity and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 10, 162–181 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ting, D. S. W., Carin, L., Dzau, V. & Wong, T. Y. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 459–461 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bazgir, O. et al. Representation of features as images with neighborhood dependencies for compatibility with convolutional neural networks. Nat. Commun. 11, 4391 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Shavitt, I. & Segal, E. Regularization learning networks: deep learning for tabular datasets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31, 1386–1396 (2018).Kossen, J. et al. Self-attention between datapoints: going beyond individual input–output pairs in deep learning. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 28742–28756 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2921–2929 (IEEE, 2016).Selvaraju, R. R. et al. Grad-cam: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 618–626 (IEEE, 2017).Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S. & Guestrin, C. “Why should i trust you?”: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1135–1144 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).Peyré, G. et al. Computational optimal transport: with applications to data science. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 11, 355–607 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
Moon, I. et al. Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary. Nat. Med. 29, 2057–2067 (2023).Peyré, G., Cuturi, M. & Solomon, J. Gromov–Wasserstein averaging of kernel and distance matrices. In International Conference on Machine Learning 2664–2672 (PMLR, 2016).Cuturi, M. Sinkhorn distances: lightspeed computation of optimal transport. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 26, 2292–2300 (2013).Crouse, D. F. On implementing 2D rectangular assignment algorithms. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 52, 1679–1696 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. in Contributions to the Theory of Games II (eds Kuhn, H. W. & Tucker, A. W.) 307–317 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1953).Deng, X. & Papadimitriou, C. H. On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Math. Oper. Res. 19, 257–266 (1994).Article
Google Scholar
Datta, A., Sen, S. & Zick, Y. Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: theory and experiments with learning systems. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) 598–617 (IEEE, 2016).Štrumbelj, E. & Kononenko, I. Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 41, 647–665 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P. & Kundaje, A. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In International Conference on Machine Learning 3145–3153 (PMLR, 2017).Sakar, C., Serbes, G., Gunduz, A., Nizam, H. & Sakar, B. Parkinson’s disease classification. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C5MS4X (2018).Mansouri, K., Ringsted, T., Ballabio, D., Todeschini, R. & Consonni, V. QSAR biodegradation. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C5H60M (2013).Reyes-Ortiz, J., Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L. & Parra, X. Human activity recognition using smartphones. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C54S4K (2012).Mah, P. & Veyrieras, J.-B. MicroMass. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C5T61S (2013).Guyon, I., Gunn, S., Ben-Hur, A. & Dror, G. Arcene. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C58P55 (2008).Cole, R. & Fanty, M. ISOLET. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C51G69 (1994).Lathrop, R. p53 Mutants. UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C5T89H (2010).Wolberg, W., Mangasarian, O., Street, N. & Street, W. Breast cancer Wisconsin (diagnostic). UCI Machine Learning Repository https://doi.org/10.24432/C5DW2B (1995).Bhattacharjee, A. et al. Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13790–13795 (2001).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Feature selection: a data perspective. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 1–45 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. scikit-feature feature selection repository. GitHub https://jundongl.github.io/scikit-feature (2018).UCI Machine Learning Repository; https://archive.ics.uci.edu