Heinig, U., Gutensohn, M., Dudareva, N. & Aharoni, A. The challenges of cellular compartmentalization in plant metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 239–246 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lazarow, P. B. Rat liver peroxisomes catalyze the β oxidation of fatty acids. J. Biol. Chem. 253, 1522–1528 (1978).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Keller, G. A., Gould, S., Deluca, M. & Subramani, S. Firefly luciferase is targeted to peroxisomes in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 3264–3268 (1987).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hayashi, M. et al. Functional transformation of plant peroxisomes. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 32, 295–304 (2000).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fung, K. & Clayton, C. Recognition of a peroxisomal tripeptide entry signal by the glycosomes of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 45, 261–264 (1991).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kiel, J. A. K. W., Hilbrands, R. E., Bovenberg, R. A. L. & Veenhuis, M. Isolation of Penicillium chrysogenum PEX1 and PEX6 encoding AAA proteins involved in peroxisome biogenesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 54, 238–242 (2000).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Purdue, P. E. & Lazarow, P. B.Peroxisome biogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 701–752 (2001).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
DeLoache, W. C., Russ, Z. N. & Dueber, J. E. Towards repurposing the yeast peroxisome for compartmentalizing heterologous metabolic pathways. Nat. Commun. 7, 11152 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dusséaux, S., Wajn, W. T., Liu, Y., Ignea, C. & Kampranis, S. C. Transforming yeast peroxisomes into microfactories for the efficient production of high-value isoprenoids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31789–31799 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Grewal, P. S., Samson, J. A., Baker, J. J., Choi, B. & Dueber, J. E. Peroxisome compartmentalization of a toxic enzyme improves alkaloid production. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 96–103 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Choi, B. H., Kang, H. J., Kim, S. C. & Lee, P. C. Organelle engineering in yeast: enhanced production of protopanaxadiol through manipulation of peroxisome proliferation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microorganisms 10, 650 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sheng, J., Stevens, J. & Feng, X. Pathway compartmentalization in peroxisome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce versatile medium chain fatty alcohols. Sci. Rep. 6, 26884 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Davies, M. E., Tsyplenkov, D. & Martin, V. J. J. Engineering yeast for de novo synthesis of the insect repellent nepetalactone. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 2896–2903 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gerke, J. et al. Production of the fragrance geraniol in peroxisomes of a product-tolerant baker’s yeast. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 582052 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Erdmann, R. & Blobel, G. Giant peroxisomes in oleic acid-induced Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking the peroxisomal membrane protein Pmp27p. J. Cell Biol. 128, 509–523 (1995).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Deb, R. & Nagotu, S.The nexus between peroxisome abundance and chronological ageing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biogerontology 24, 81–97 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Huber, A., Koch, J., Kragler, F., Brocard, C. & Hartig, A. A subtle interplay between three Pex11 proteins shapes de novo formation and fission of peroxisomes. Traffic 13, 157–167 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Krikken, A. M., Veenhuis, M. & van der Klei, I. J. Hansenula polymorpha pex11 cells are affected in peroxisome retention. FEBS J. 276, 1429–1439 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Greenhalgh, J. C., Fahlberg, S. A., Pfleger, B. F. & Romero, P. A. Machine learning-guided acyl-ACP reductase engineering for improved in vivo fatty alcohol production. Nat. Commun. 12, 5825 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mukherjee, M., Blair, R. H. & Wang, Z. Q. Machine-learning guided elucidation of contribution of individual steps in the mevalonate pathway and construction of a yeast platform strain for terpenoid production. Metab. Eng. 74, 139–149 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, S. et al. Massive computational acceleration by using neural networks to emulate mechanism-based biological models. Nat. Commun. 10, 4354 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Radivojević, T., Costello, Z., Workman, K. & Garcia Martin, H. A machine learning automated recommendation tool for synthetic biology. Nat. Commun. 11, 4879 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Daniels, K. G. et al. Decoding CAR T cell phenotype using combinatorial signaling motif libraries and machine learning. Science 378, 1194–1200 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Luo, N., Wang, S., Lu, J., Ouyang, X. & You, L. Collective colony growth is optimized by branching pattern formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10089 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wu, Z., Kan, S. B. J., Lewis, R. D., Wittmann, B. J. & Arnold, F. H. Machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution with combinatorial libraries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8852–8858 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, W. & Viljoen, A. M. Geraniol—a review of a commercially important fragrance material. S. Afr. J. Bot. 76, 643–651 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rubat, S. et al. Increasing the intracellular isoprenoid pool in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by structural fine-tuning of a bifunctional farnesyl diphosphate synthase. FEMS Yeast Res. 17, fox032 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhao, J. et al. Dynamic control of ERG20 expression combined with minimized endogenous downstream metabolism contributes to the improvement of geraniol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 16, 17 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ignea, C., Pontini, M., Maffei, M. E., Makris, A. M. & Kampranis, S. C. Engineering monoterpene production in yeast using a synthetic dominant negative geranyl diphosphate synthase. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 298–306 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, M. E., DeLoache, W. C., Cervantes, B. & Dueber, J. E. A highly characterized yeast toolkit for modular, multipart assembly. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 975–986 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
van Roermund, C. W. T., Tabak, H. F., van den Berg, M., Wanders, R. J. A. & Hettema, E. H. Pex11p plays a primary role in medium-chain fatty acid oxidation, a process that affects peroxisome number and size in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 150, 489–498 (2000).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tam, Y. Y. C. et al. Pex11-related proteins in peroxisome dynamics: a role for the novel peroxin Pex27p in controlling peroxisome size and number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4089–4102 (2003).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lin, P. et al. Direct utilization of peroxisomal acetyl-CoA for the synthesis of polyketide compounds in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth. Biol. 12, 1599–1607 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yofe, I. et al. Pex35 is a regulator of peroxisome abundance. J. Cell Sci. 130, 791–804 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rottensteiner, H., Stein, K., Sonnenhol, E. & Erdmann, R. Conserved function of Pex11p and the novel Pex25p and Pex27p in peroxisome biogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4316–4328 (2003).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tower, R. J., Fagarasanu, A., Aitchison, J. D. & Rachubinski, R. A. The peroxin Pex34p functions with the Pex11 family of peroxisomal divisional proteins to regulate the peroxisome population in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 1727–1738 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hoepfner, D., van den Berg, M., Philippsen, P., Tabak, H. F. & Hettema, E. H. A role for Vps1p, actin, and the Myo2p motor in peroxisome abundance and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 155, 979–990 (2001).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wróblewska, J. P. & van der Klei, I. J. Peroxisome maintenance depends on de novo peroxisome formation in yeast mutants defective in peroxisome fission and inheritance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4023 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yuan, W., Veenhuis, M. & van der Klei, I. J. The birth of yeast peroxisomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 902–910 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wittmann, B. J., Yue, Y. & Arnold, F. H. Informed training set design enables efficient machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution. Cell Syst. 12, 1026–1045 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pandi, A. et al. A versatile active learning workflow for optimization of genetic and metabolic networks. Nat. Commun. 13, 3876 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, J. et al. Combining mechanistic and machine learning models for predictive engineering and optimization of tryptophan metabolism. Nat. Commun. 11, 4880 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Peng, B. et al. A squalene synthase protein degradation method for improved sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 39, 209–219 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhao, J., Bao, X., Li, C., Shen, Y. & Hou, J. Improving monoterpene geraniol production through geranyl diphosphate synthesis regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 4561–4571 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Osterberg, M., Kim, H., Warringer, J. & von Heijne, G. Phenotypic effects of membrane protein overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11148–11153 (2006).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google ScholarÂ
Galton, F. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 15, 246–263 (1886).
Google ScholarÂ
Cover, T. & Hart, P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13, 21–27 (1967).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ho, T. K. Random decision forests. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (eds Kavanaugh, M. & Storms, P.) (IEEE, 1995).Vapnik, V. N. The support vector method. In Proc. Artificial Neural Networks—ICANN’97 (eds Gerstner, W. et al.) (Springer, 1997).Friedman, J. H.Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
O’Shea, K. & Nash, R. An introduction to convolutional neural networks. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1511.08458 (2015).Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. & Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 2278–2324 (1998).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Géron, A. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems (O’Reilly, 2019).McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1802.03426 (2020).van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
Google ScholarÂ
Tieleman, T. & Hinton, G. in Neural Networks for Machine Learning Vol. 4, 26–31 (COURSERA, 2012).Baker, J. Engineering yeast peroxisomes to be high capacity for production of geraniol. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26156098.v1 (2024).Shi, J., Wang, S. & Capponi, S. CCCofficial/ML_Pipeline_Yeast_Peroxisome. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13334581 (2024).