Structure-based prediction of T cell receptor recognition of unseen epitopes using TCRen

Qi, Q. et al. Diversity and clonal selection in the human T-cell repertoire. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13139–13144 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mora, T. & Walczak, A. M. How many different clonotypes do immune repertoires contain? Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 18, 104–110 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Valkiers, S. et al. Recent advances in T-cell receptor repertoire analysis: bridging the gap with multimodal single-cell RNA sequencing. ImmunoInformatics 5, 100009 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosati, E. et al. Overview of methodologies for T-cell receptor repertoire analysis. BMC Biotechnol. 17, 1–16 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Joglekar, A. V. & Li, G. T cell antigen discovery. Nat. Methods 18, 873–880 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, X. et al. Rapid assessment of T-cell receptor specificity of the immune repertoire. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 362–373 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, N. K. et al. Emerging concepts in TCR specificity: rationalizing and (maybe) predicting outcomes. J. Immunol. 199, 2203–2213 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hudson, D., Fernandes, R. A., Basham, M., Ogg, G. & Koohy, H. Can we predict T cell specificity with digital biology and machine learning? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 23, 511–521 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gielis, S. et al. Detection of enriched T cell epitope specificity in full T cell receptor sequence repertoires. Front. Immunol. 10, 2820 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montemurro, A. et al. NetTCR-2.0 enables accurate prediction of TCR–peptide binding by using paired TCRα and β sequence data. Commun. Biol. 4, 1060 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mayer-Blackwell, K. et al. TCR meta-clonotypes for biomarker discovery with tcrdist3 enabled identification of public, HLA-restricted clusters of SARS-CoV-2 TCRs. eLife 10, e68605 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weber, A., Born, J. & Rodriguez Martínez, M. TITAN: T-cell receptor specificity prediction with bimodal attention networks. Bioinformatics 37, i237–i244 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Springer, I., Tickotsky, N. & Louzoun, Y. Contribution of T cell receptor alpha and beta CDR3, MHC typing, V and J genes to peptide binding prediction. Front. Immunol. 12, 664514 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bagaev, D. V. et al. VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D1057–D1062 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tickotsky, N., Sagiv, T., Prilusky, J., Shifrut, E. & Friedman, N. McPAS-TCR: a manually curated catalogue of pathology-associated T cell receptor sequences. Bioinformatics 33, 2924–2929 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berman, H. M. et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jensen, K. K. et al. TCRpMHCmodels: structural modelling of TCR–pMHC class I complexes. Sci. Rep. 9, 14530 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meysman, P. et al. Benchmarking solutions to the T-cell receptor epitope prediction problem: IMMREP22 workshop report. ImmunoInformatics 9, 100024 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, Y., Huo, M. & Cheng Li, S. TEINet: a deep learning framework for prediction of TCR-epitope binding specificity. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad086 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, M., Bang, S., Zhang, P. & Lee, H. ATM-TCR: TCR–epitope binding affinity prediction using a multi-head self-attention model. Front. Immunol. 13, 893247 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Y. et al. Pan-Peptide Meta Learning for T-cell receptor–antigen binding recognition. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 236–249 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keskin, O., Bahar, I., Badretdinov, A. Y., Ptitsyn, O. B. & Jernigan, R. L. Empirical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intra-molecular and inter-molecular inter-residue interactions. Protein Sci. 7, 2578–2586 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miyazawa, S. & Jernigan, R. L. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18, 534–552 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vita, R. et al. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D339–D343 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Birnbaum, M. E. et al. Deconstructing the peptide-MHC specificity of T cell recognition. Cell 157, 1073–1087 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alford, R. F. et al. The rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3031–3048 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumari, R. & Kumar, R. Open source drug discovery consortium, A. Lynn, g_mmpbsa–a GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54, 1951–1962 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gee, M. H. et al. Antigen identification for orphan T cell receptors expressed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Cell 172, 549–563.e16 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Atchley, W. R., Zhao, J., Fernandes, A. D. & Drüke, T. Solving the protein sequence metric problem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6395–6400 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kosmrlj, A., Jha, A. K., Huseby, E. S., Kardar, M. & Chakraborty, A. K. How the thymus designs antigen-specific and self-tolerant T cell receptor sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16671–16676 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bobisse, S. et al. Sensitive and frequent identification of high avidity neo-epitope specific CD8+ T cells in immunotherapy-naive ovarian cancer. Nat. Commun. 9, 1092 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Devlin, J. R. et al. Structural dissimilarity from self drives neoepitope escape from immune tolerance. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 1269–1276 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bigot, J. et al. Splicing patterns in SF3B1-mutated uveal melanoma generate shared immunogenic tumor-specific neoepitopes. Cancer Discov. 11, 1938–1951 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradley, P. Structure-based prediction of T cell receptor:peptide-MHC interactions. eLife 12, e82813 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yin, R. et al. TCRmodel2: high-resolution modeling of T cell receptor recognition using deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad356 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tubiana, J., Schneidman-Duhovny, D. & Wolfson, H. J. ScanNet: an interpretable geometric deep learning model for structure-based protein binding site prediction. Nat. Methods 19, 730–739 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gainza, P. et al. Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning. Nat. Methods 17, 184–192 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynisson, B., Alvarez, B., Paul, S., Peters, B. & Nielsen, M. NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W449–W454 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riley, T. P. et al. T cell receptor cross-reactivity expanded by dramatic peptide-MHC adaptability. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 934–942 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karnaukhov, V. Structure-based prediction of T-cell receptor recognition of unseen epitopes using residue-level pairwise statistical potential TCRen. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11129800 (2024).