van der Woude, M. W. & Bäumler, A. J. Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17, 581–611 (2004).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Trzilova, D. & Tamayo, R. Site-specific recombination—how simple DNA inversions produce complex phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial populations. Trends Genet. 37, 59–72 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zieg, J., Silverman, M., Hilmen, M. & Simon, M. Recombinational switch for gene expression. Science 196, 170–172 (1977).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Stocker, B. A. Measurements of rate of mutation of flagellar antigenic phase in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Hyg. 47, 398–413 (1949).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Meydan, S., Vázquez-Laslop, N. & Mankin, A. S. Genes within genes in bacterial genomes. Microbiol. Spectr. 6, rwr-0020-2018 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhong, A. et al. Toxic antiphage defense proteins inhibited by intragenic antitoxin proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2307382120 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Moxon, R., Bayliss, C. & Hood, D. Bacterial contingency loci: the role of simple sequence DNA repeats in bacterial adaptation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40, 307–333 (2006).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sberro, H. et al. Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes. Cell 178, 1245–1259.e14 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schlub, T. E. & Holmes, E. C. Properties and abundance of overlapping genes in viruses. Virus Evol. 6, veaa009 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Medhekar, B. & Miller, J. F. Diversity-generating retroelements. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 388–395 (2007).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Andrewes, F. W. Studies in group-agglutination I. The Salmonella group and its antigenic structure. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 25, 505–521 (1922).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Goldberg, A., Fridman, O., Ronin, I. & Balaban, N. Q. Systematic identification and quantification of phase variation in commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli. Genome Med. 6, 112 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sekulovic, O. et al. Genome-wide detection of conservative site-specific recombination in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007332 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jiang, X. et al. Invertible promoters mediate bacterial phase variation, antibiotic resistance, and host adaptation in the gut. Science 363, 181–187 (2019).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Milman, O., Yelin, I. & Kishony, R. Systematic identification of gene-altering programmed inversions across the bacterial domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 553–573 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Komano, T. Shufflons: multiple inversion systems and integrons. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 171–191 (1999).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Atack, J. M., Guo, C., Yang, L., Zhou, Y. & Jennings, M. P. DNA sequence repeats identify numerous type I restriction-modification systems that are potential epigenetic regulators controlling phase-variable regulons; phasevarions. FASEB J. 34, 1038–1051 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chatzidaki-Livanis, M., Coyne, M. J., Roche-Hakansson, H. & Comstock, L. E. Expression of a uniquely regulated extracellular polysaccharide confers a large-capsule phenotype to Bacteroides fragilis. J. Bacteriol. 190, 1020–1026 (2008).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Taketani, M., Donia, M. S., Jacobson, A. N., Lambris, J. D. & Fischbach, M. A. A phase-variable surface layer from the gut symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. mBio 6, e01339-15 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Troy, E. B., Carey, V. J., Kasper, D. L. & Comstock, L. E. Orientations of the Bacteroides fragilis capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis locus promoters during symbiosis and infection. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5832–5836 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Severyn, C. J. et al. Microbiota dynamics in a randomized trial of gut decontamination during allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. JCI Insight 7, e154344 (2022).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Siranosian, B. A. et al. Rare transmission of commensal and pathogenic bacteria in the gut microbiome of hospitalized adults. Nat. Commun. 13, 586 (2022).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Martens, E. C., Chiang, H. C. & Gordon, J. I. Mucosal glycan foraging enhances fitness and transmission of a saccharolytic human gut bacterial symbiont. Cell Host Microbe 4, 447–457 (2008).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Martens, E. C., Roth, R., Heuser, J. E. & Gordon, J. I. Coordinate regulation of glycan degradation and polysaccharide capsule biosynthesis by a prominent human gut symbiont. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 18445–18457 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Krinos, C. M. et al. Extensive surface diversity of a commensal microorganism by multiple DNA inversions. Nature 414, 555–558 (2001).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Porter, N. T. et al. Phase-variable capsular polysaccharides and lipoproteins modify bacteriophage susceptibility in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1170–1181 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Round, J. L. et al. The Toll-like receptor 2 pathway establishes colonization by a commensal of the human microbiota. Science 332, 974–977 (2011).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Neff, C. P. et al. Diverse intestinal bacteria contain putative zwitterionic capsular polysaccharides with anti-inflammatory properties. Cell Host Microbe 20, 535–547 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mazmanian, S. K., Liu, C. H., Tzianabos, A. O. & Kasper, D. L. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 122, 107–118 (2005).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Porter, N. T., Canales, P., Peterson, D. A. & Martens, E. C. A Subset of polysaccharide capsules in the human symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron promote increased competitive fitness in the mouse gut. Cell Host Microbe 22, 494–506.e8 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Musumeci, O. et al. Intragenic inversion of mtDNA: a new type of pathogenic mutation in a patient with mitochondrial myopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1900–1904 (2000).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Smyshlyaev, G., Bateman, A. & Barabas, O. Sequence analysis of tyrosine recombinases allows annotation of mobile genetic elements in prokaryotic genomes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e9880 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
West, P. T., Chanin, R. B. & Bhatt, A. S. From genome structure to function: insights into structural variation in microbiology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 69, 102192 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246 (2024).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Casino, P., Rubio, V. & Marina, A. The mechanism of signal transduction by two-component systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20, 763–771 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Loenen, W. A. M., Dryden, D. T. F., Raleigh, E. A. & Wilson, G. G. Type I restriction enzymes and their relatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 20–44 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
De Ste Croix, M. et al. Phase-variable methylation and epigenetic regulation by type I restriction-modification systems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, S3–S15 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, L. et al. Short- and long-read metagenomics expand individualized structural variations in gut microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 13, 3175 (2022).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maghini, D. G. et al. Quantifying bias introduced by sample collection in relative and absolute microbiome measurements. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 328–338 (2024).Rodionov, D. A. et al. Micronutrient requirements and sharing capabilities of the human gut microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1316 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sharma, V. et al. B-vitamin sharing promotes stability of gut microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1485 (2019).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yatsunenko, T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–227 (2012).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Costliow, Z. A. & Degnan, P. H. Thiamine acquisition strategies impact metabolism and competition in the gut microbe Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. mSystems 2, e00116–17 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Martinez-Gomez, N. C. & Downs, D. M. ThiC is an [Fe-S] cluster protein that requires AdoMet to generate the 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine moiety in thiamin synthesis. Biochemistry 47, 9054–9056 (2008).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Said, H. M. Intestinal absorption of water-soluble vitamins in health and disease. Biochem. J. 437, 357–372 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
D’Souza, G. et al. Less is more: selective advantages can explain the prevalent loss of biosynthetic genes in bacteria. Evolution 68, 2559–2570 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jurgenson, C. T., Ealick, S. E. & Begley, T. P. Biosynthesis of thiamin pyrophosphate. EcoSal Plus https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.3.7 (2009).Rodionov, D. A., Vitreschak, A. G., Mironov, A. A. & Gelfand, M. S. Comparative genomics of thiamin biosynthesis in prokaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48949–48959 (2002).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bacic, M. K. & Smith, C. J. Laboratory maintenance and cultivation of bacteroides species. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259.mc13c01s9 (2008).Zhu, W. et al. Xenosiderophore utilization promotes Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron resilience during colitis. Cell Host Microbe 27, 376–388.e8 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rice, P., Longden, I. & Bleasby, A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 16, 276–277 (2000).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yang, C., Chu, J., Warren, R. L. & Birol, I. NanoSim: nanopore sequence read simulator based on statistical characterization. Gigascience 6, gix010 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ono, Y., Asai, K. & Hamada, M. PBSIM2: a simulator for long-read sequencers with a novel generative model of quality scores. Bioinformatics 37, 589–595 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
De Coster, W., D’Hert, S., Schultz, D. T., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34, 2666–2669 (2018).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36, 2251–2252 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
MathSciNetÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Paysan-Lafosse, T. et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D418–D427 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. 57, 289–300 (1995).ArticleÂ
MathSciNetÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Prjibelski, A., Antipov, D., Meleshko, D., Lapidus, A. & Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 70, e102 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lin, Y. et al. Assembly of long error-prone reads using de Bruijn graphs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E8396–E8405 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Skowronek, P. et al. Rapid and in-depth coverage of the (phospho-)proteome with deep libraries and optimal window design for dia-PASEF. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 21, 100279 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kong, A. T., Leprevost, F. V., Avtonomov, D. M., Mellacheruvu, D. & Nesvizhskii, A. I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 14, 513–520 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S. & Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods 17, 41–44 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966–968 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pino, L. K. et al. The Skyline ecosystem: informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 39, 229–244 (2020).ArticleÂ
ADSÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D543–D552 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ