Ferguson, N. M. Challenges and opportunities in controlling mosquito-borne infections. Nature 559, 490–497 (2018).Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maurya, R. P. et al. Biological control: A global perspective. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 42, 3203–3220 (2022).Article
Google Scholar
Gould, F., Brown, Z. S. & Kuzma, J. Wicked evolution: Can we address the sociobiological dilemma of pesticide resistance? Science 360, 728–732 (2018).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Walsh, T. K. et al. Determinants of insecticide resistance evolution: Comparative analysis among heliothines. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 67, 387–406 (2022).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tudi, M. et al. Agriculture development, pesticide application and its impact on the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 18, 1112 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bourtzis, K. & Vreysen, M. J. B. Sterile insect technique (SIT) and its applications. Insects 12, 638 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Burt, A. & Crisanti, A. Gene drive: Evolved and synthetic. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 343–346 (2018).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bier, E. Gene drives gaining speed. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00386-0 (2021).Quinn, C. M. & Nolan, T. Nuclease-based gene drives, an innovative tool for insect vector control: advantages and challenges of the technology. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 39, 77–83 (2020).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Benedict, M. Q. Sterile insect technique: Lessons from the past. J. Med. Entomol. 58, 1974–1979 (2021).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Grilli, S., Galizi, R. & Taxiarchi, C. Genetic technologies for sustainable management of insect pests and disease vectors. Sustainability 13, 5653 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Wang, G.-H. et al. Symbionts and gene drive: Two strategies to combat vector-borne disease. Trends Genet. 38, 708–723 (2022).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maselko, M. et al. Engineering multiple species-like genetic incompatibilities in insects. Nat. Commun. 11, 4468 (2020).Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Li, M. et al. Suppressing mosquito populations with precision guided sterile males. Nat. Commun. 12, 5374 (2021).Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hay, B. A., Oberhofer, G. & Guo, M. Engineering the composition and fate of wild populations with gene drive. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 66, 407–434 (2021).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Knipling, E. F. Sterile-male method of population control. Science 130, 902–904 (1959).Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Scott, M. J., Concha, C., Welch, J. B., Phillips, P. L. & Skoda, S. R. Review of research advances in the screwworm eradication program over the past 25 years. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 164, 226–236 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Hendrichs, J., Franz, G. & Rendon, P. Increased effectiveness and applicability of the sterile insect technique through male-only releases for control of mediterranean fruit flies during fruiting seasons. J. Appl. Entomol. 119, 371–377 (1995).Article
Google Scholar
Harris, A. F. et al. Successful suppression of a field mosquito population by sustained release of engineered male mosquitoes. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 828–830 (2012).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Thomas, D. D., Donnelly, C. A., Wood, R. J. & Alphey, L. S. Insect Population Control Using a Dominant, Repressible, Lethal Genetic System. Science 287, 2474–2476 (2000).Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Black, W. C., Alphey, L. & James, A. A. Why RIDL is not SIT. Trends Parasitol. 27, 362–370 (2011).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Siddall, A., Harvey-Samuel, T., Chapman, T. & Leftwich, P. T. Manipulating insect sex determination pathways for genetic pest management: Opportunities and challenges. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 867851 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Vásquez, V. N.; Reddy, M. R.; Marshall, J. M. Environmentally appropriate vector control is facilitated by standard metrics for simulation-based evaluation. Front. Trop. Dis. 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2022.953212 (2022).Leftwich, P. T. et al. Genetic elimination of field-cage populations of mediterranean fruit flies. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1372 (2014).Labbé, G. M. C., Scaife, S., Morgan, S. A., Curtis, Z. H. & Alphey, L. Female-specific flightless (fsRIDL) phenotype for control of Aedes Albopictus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1724 (2012).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Waltz, E. First genetically modified mosquitoes released in the United States. Nature 593, 175–176 (2021).Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harris, A. F. et al. Field performance of engineered male mosquitoes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1034–1037 (2011).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carvalho, D. O. et al. Suppression of a field population of Aedes Aegypti in Brazil by sustained release of transgenic male mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003864 (2015).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Harvey-Samuel, T., Ant, T., Gong, H., Morrison, N. I. & Alphey, L. Population-level effects of fitness Costs associated with repressible female-lethal transgene insertions in two pest insects. Evol. Appl. 7, 597–606 (2014).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jin, L. et al. Engineered female-specific lethality for control of pest Lepidoptera. ACS Synth. Biol. 2, 160–166 (2013).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bax, N. J. & Thresher, R. E. Ecological, behavioral, and genetic factors influencing the recombinant control of invasive pests. Ecol. Appl. Publ. Ecol. Soc. Am. 19, 873–888 (2009).
Google Scholar
Teem, J. L., Gutierrez, J. B. & Parshad, R. D. A comparison of the Trojan Y chromosome and daughterless carp eradication strategies. Biol. Invasions 16, 1217–1230 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Thresher, R. E. Autocidal technology for the control of invasive fish Fisheries 33, 114–121 (2008).Lutrat, C. et al. Combining two genetic sexing strains allows sorting of non-transgenic males for Aedes genetic control. Commun Biol 6, 646 (2023).Kojin, B. B., Compton, A., Adelman, Z. N. & Tu, Z. Selective targeting of biting females to control mosquito-borne infectious diseases. Trends Parasitol. 38, 791–804 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wilke, A. B. B. & Marrelli, M. T. Genetic control of mosquitoes: Population suppression strategies. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 54, 287–292 (2012).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Qsim, M. et al. Genetically modified Aedes Aegypti to control dengue: A review. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 27, 331–340 (2017).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Facchinelli, L. et al. Field cage studies and progressive evaluation of genetically-engineered mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2001 (2013).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Verkuijl, S. A. N., Ang, J. X. D., Alphey, L., Bonsall, M. B. & Anderson, M. A. E. The challenges in developing efficient and robust synthetic homing endonuclease gene drives. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 0, 426 (2022).
Google Scholar
Burt, A. Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 270, 921–928 (2003).Article
Google Scholar
Hammond, A. et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the Malaria Mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 78–83 (2016).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Verhulst, E. C. & van de Zande, L. Double nexus–doublesex is the connecting element in sex determination. Brief. Funct. Genomics 14, 396–406 (2015).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kyrou, K. et al. A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1062–1066 (2018).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Krzywinska, E. et al. Femaleless controls sex determination and dosage compensation pathways in females of Anopheles Mosquitoes. Curr. Biol. 31, 1084–1091.e4 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Koukidou, M. & Alphey, L. Practical applications of insects’ sexual development for pestcontrol. Sex. Dev. 8, 127–136 (2014).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nagoshi, R. N., McKeown, M., Burtis, K. C., Belote, J. M. & Baker, B. S. The control of alternative splicing at genes regulating sexual differentiation in D. Melanogaster. Cell 53, 229–236 (1988).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nagoshi, R. N. & Baker, B. S. Regulation of sex-specific RNA splicing at the Drosophila doublesex gene: cis-acting mutations in exon sequences alter sex-specific RNA splicing patterns. Genes Dev. 4, 89–97 (1990).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ranian, K., Kashif Zahoor, M., Zulhussnain, M. & Ahmad, A. CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated sex-ratio distortion by sex specific gene editing in Aedes Aegypti. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 29, 3015–3022 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yadav, A. K. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based split homing gene drive targeting doublesex for population suppression of the global fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2301525120 (2023).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Champer, J. et al. Reducing resistance allele formation in CRISPR gene drive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5522–5527 (2018).Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Unckless, R. L., Clark, A. G. & Messer, P. W. Evolution of resistance against CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive. Genetics 205, 827–841 (2017).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beaghton, A. K., Hammond, A., Nolan, T., Crisanti, A. & Burt, A. Gene drive for population genetic control: non-functional resistance and parental effects. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20191586 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
Yang, E. et al. A homing suppression gene drive with multiplexed gRNAs maintains high drive conversion efficiency and avoids functional resistance alleles. GenesGenomesGenetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac081 (2022).Champer, S. E. et al. Computational and experimental performance of CRISPR homing gene drive strategies with multiplexed gRNAs. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz0525 (2020).Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Marshall, J. M. & Hay, B. A. Confinement of gene drive systems to local populations: A comparative analysis. J. Theor. Biol. 294, 153–171 (2012).Article
ADS
MathSciNet
PubMed
Google Scholar
Adolfi, A. et al. Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles Stephensi. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–13 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Champer, J. et al. Molecular safeguarding of CRISPR gene drive experiments. ELife 8, e41439 (2019).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Terradas, G. et al. Inherently confinable split-drive systems in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–12 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Akbari, O. S. et al. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory: Multiple stringent confinement strategies should be used whenever possible. Science 349, 927–929 (2015).Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhu, J., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Xu, X. & Champer, J. Population suppression with dominant female-lethal alleles is boosted by homing gene drive. BMC Biol 22, 201 (2024).Burt, A. & Deredec, A. Self-limiting population genetic control with sex-linked genome editors. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0776 (2018).Epper, F. Morphological analysis and fate map of the intersexual genital disc of the mutant doublesex-dominant in Drosophila Melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 88, 104–114 (1981).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Waterbury, J. A., Jackson, L. L. & Schedl, P. Analysis of the doublesex female protein in drosophila melanogaster: Role on sexual differentiation and behavior and dependence on intersex. Genetics 152, 1653–1667 (1999).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Burtis, K. C. & Baker, B. S. Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides. Cell 56, 997–1010 (1989).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Su, M. P. et al. Assessing the acoustic behaviour of anopheles gambiae (s.l.) dsxF mutants: Implications for vector control. Parasit. Vectors 13, 507 (2020).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Du, J. et al. Germline Cas9 promoters with improved performance for homing gene drive. Nat Commun 15, 4560 (2024).Lynch, K. W. & Maniatis, T. Assembly of specific SR protein complexes on distinct regulatory elements of the Drosophila doublesex splicing enhancer. Genes Dev. 10, 2089–2101 (1996).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hedley, M. L. & Maniatis, T. Sex-specific splicing and polyadenylation of Dsx pre-mRNA requires a sequence that binds specifically to tra-2 protein in vitro. Cell 65, 579–586 (1991).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ryner, L. C. & Baker, B. S. Regulation of doublesex Pre-mRNA processing occurs by 3’-splice site activation. Genes Dev. 5, 2071–2085 (1991).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Champer, J. Simulations reveal high efficiency and confinement of a population suppression CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drive. ACS Synth. Biol. 12, 809–819 (2023).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Faber, N. R. et al. Improving the suppressive power of homing gene drive by co-targeting a distant-site female fertility gene. Nat Commun (in press), (2024).López Del Amo, V. et al. Small-molecule control of super-mendelian inheritance in gene drives. Cell Rep. 31, 107841 (2020).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Davis, M. W. & Jorgensen, E. M. ApE, a Plasmid editor: A freely available DNA manipulation and visualization program. Front. Bioinforma. 0, 5 (2022).
Google Scholar
Champer, J. et al. A CRISPR homing gene drive targeting a haplolethal gene removes resistancealleles and successfully spreads through a cage population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24377–24383 (2020).Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Haller, B. C. & Messer, P. W. SLiM 4: Multispecies eco-evolutionary modeling. Am. Nat. 201, E127–E139 (2023).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Teo, W., Yang, H. & Champer, J. Adversarial interspecies relationships facilitate population suppression by gene drive in spatially explicit models. Ecol. Lett. 26, 1174–1185 (2023).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Champer, S. E., Kim, I. K., Clark, A. G., Messer, P. W. & Champer, J. Anopheles homing suppression drive candidates exhibit unexpected performance differences in simulations with spatial structure. ELife, 11, https://doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.79121 (2022).Liu, Y.; Champer, J. Modelling homing suppression gene drive in haplodiploid organisms. Proc. R. Soc. B, 289, https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2022.0320 (2022).Liu, J. et al. Maximum likelihood estimation of fitness components in experimental evolution. Genetics 211, 1005–1017 (2019).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sjödin, P., Kaj, I., Krone, S., Lascoux, M. & Nordborg, M. On the meaning and existence of an effective population size. Genetics 169, 1061–1070 (2005).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nürnberger, B. Ecological genetics. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity; Levin, S. A., Ed.; Elsevier: New York; pp 245–258 (2001).