Song, K. S., Fritz, P. W. & Coskun, A. Porous organic polymers for CO2 capture, separation and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 9831–9852 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bai, S. T. et al. Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts for hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol under mild conditions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 4259–4298 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Velty, A. & Corma, A. Advanced zeolite and ordered mesoporous silica-based catalysts for the conversion of CO2 to chemicals and fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 1773–1946 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhai, P. et al. Highly tunable selectivity for syngas-derived alkenes over zinc and sodium-modulated Fe5C2 catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 9902–9907 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Omae, I. Recent developments in carbon dioxide utilization for the production of organic chemicals. Coord. Chem. Rev. 256, 1384–1405 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, X. D. et al. Catalytic performance of the Pt/TiO2 catalysts in reverse water gas shift reaction: controlled product selectivity and a mechanism study. Catal. Today 281, 312–318 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, X. et al. Controlling CO2 hydrogenation selectivity by metal-supported electron transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19983–19989 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, X. et al. Theoretical insights and the corresponding construction of supported metal catalysts for highly selective CO2 to CO conversion. ACS Catal. 7, 4613–4620 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Du, P. et al. Single-atom-driven dynamic carburization over Pd1–FeOx catalyst boosting CO2 conversion. Chem 8, 3252–3262 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shen, L., Xu, J., Zhu, M. & Han, Y.-F. Essential role of the support for nickel-based CO2 methanation catalysts. ACS Catal. 10, 14581–14591 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, Y. et al. Single-atom Co-N-C catalysts for high-efficiency reverse water-gas shift reaction. Appl. Catal. B 324, 122298 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Park, J.-N. & McFarland, E. W. A highly dispersed Pd–Mg/SiO2 catalyst active for methanation of CO2. J. Catal. 266, 92–97 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhu, Y. et al. Environment of metal–O–Fe bonds enabling high activity in CO2 reduction on single metal atoms and on supported nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 5540–5549 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, S. et al. Tuning the CO2 hydrogenation selectivity of rhodium single-atom catalysts on zirconium dioxide with alkali Ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202218167 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sengupta, S., Jha, A., Shende, P., Maskara, R. & Das, A. K. Catalytic performance of Co and Ni doped Fe-based catalysts for the hydrogenation of CO2 to CO via reverse water-gas shift reaction. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 7, 102911 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lu, J. et al. Ir single atoms and clusters supported on α-MoC as catalysts for efficient hydrogenation of CO2 to CO. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 39, 2302021 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, X. et al. Highly dispersed copper over β-Mo2C as an efficient and stable catalyst for the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction. ACS Catal. 7, 912–918 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kunkel, C., Viñes, F. & Illas, F. Transition metal carbides as novel materials for CO2 capture, storage, and activation. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 141–144 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, X. et al. Synergy between β-Mo2C nanorods and non-thermal plasma for selective CO2 reduction to CO. Chem 6, 3312–3328 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Deng, Y. et al. Molybdenum carbide: controlling the geometric and electronic structure of noble metals for the activation of O–H and C–H bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 3372–3383 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, L. et al. Transition metal carbides: emerging CO2 hydrogenation catalysts, from recent advance to future exploration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2309850 (2023).Wang, H. et al. H2 production from methane reforming over molybdenum carbide catalysts: from surface properties and reaction mechanism to catalyst development. ACS Catal. 12, 15501–15528 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Baddour, F. G. et al. An exceptionally mild and scalable solution-phase synthesis of molybdenum carbide nanoparticles for thermocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 1010–1019 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ahmadi Khoshooei, M. et al. An active, stable cubic molybdenum carbide catalyst for the high-temperature reverse water-gas shift reaction. Science 384, 540–546 (2024).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, X. et al. In situ investigations on structural evolutions during the facile synthesis of cubic α-MoC1–x catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 22589–22598 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Posada-Pérez, S. et al. The bending machine: CO2 activation and hydrogenation on δ-MoC(001) and β-Mo2C(001) surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 14912–14921 (2014).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, J. et al. Defect-driven efficient selective CO2 hydrogenation with Mo-based clusters. JACS Au 3, 2736–2748 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, X. et al. A stable low-temperature H2-production catalyst by crowding Pt on α-MoC. Nature 589, 396–401 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sullivan, M. M. & Bhan, A. Effects of oxygen coverage on rates and selectivity of propane-CO2 reactions on molybdenum carbide. J. Catal. 357, 195–205 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lezcano-González, I. et al. Molybdenum speciation and its impact on catalytic activity during methane dehydroaromatization in zeolite ZSM-5 as revealed by operando X-ray methods. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 5215–5219 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yang, M. et al. Probing the nature of zinc in copper-zinc-zirconium catalysts by operando spectroscopies for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202216803 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, J. et al.Facile synthesis of highly active Rh/Al2O3 steam reforming catalysts with preformed support by flame spray pyrolysis. Appl. Catal. B 198, 171–179 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yao, S. et al. Atomic-layered Au clusters on α-MoC as catalysts for the low-temperature water-gas shift reaction. Science 357, 389–393 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Belgamwar, R. et al. Defects tune the strong metal-support interactions in copper supported on defected titanium dioxide catalysts for CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8634–8646 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liu, H. X. et al. Partially sintered copper–ceria as excellent catalyst for the high-temperature reverse water gas shift reaction. Nat. Commun. 13, 867 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yao, S. et al. Exploring metal–support interactions to immobilize subnanometer Co clusters on γ–Mo2N: a highly selective and stable catalyst for CO2 activation. ACS Catal. 9, 9087–9097 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liang, B. et al. Promoting role of potassium in the reverse water gas shift reaction on Pt/mullite catalyst. Catal. Today 281, 319–326 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, X. et al. A novel Ni–MoCxOy interfacial catalyst for syngas production via the chemical looping dry reforming of methane. Chem 9, 102–116 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xin, H. et al. Overturning CO2 hydrogenation selectivity with high activity via reaction-induced strong metal–support interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 4874–4882 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Z. S. et al. Intrinsically active surface in a Pt/γ-Mo2N catalyst for the water–gas shift reaction: molybdenum nitride or molybdenum oxide? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13362–13371 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xu, J. P. et al. Multi-physics instrument: total scattering neutron time-of-flight diffractometer at China Spallation Neutron Source. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1013, 165642 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Xu, J. et al. Physical design of multipurpose physics neutron diffractometer for the CSNS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 927, 161–168 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kammert, J. et al. Nature of reactive hydrogen for ammonia synthesis over a Ru/C12A7 electride catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7655–7667 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, X. et al. Neutron scattering studies of heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Rev. 123, 8638–8700 (2023).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Su, X., Yang, X., Zhao, B. & Huang, Y. Designing of highly selective and high-temperature endurable RWGS heterogeneous catalysts: recent advances and the future directions. J. Energy Chem. 26, 854–867 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Z. et al. Tailored metastable Ce–Zr oxides with highly distorted lattice oxygen for accelerating redox cycles. Chem. Sci. 9, 3386–3394 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yu, J. et al. Stabilizing Cu+ in Cu/SiO2 catalysts with a Shattuckite-like structure boosts CO2 hydrogenation into methanol. ACS Catal. 10, 14694–14706 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sun, X. et al. Controlling phase transfer of molybdenum carbides by various metals for highly efficient hydrogen production. J. Energy Chem. 62, 191–197 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Toby, B. H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 210–213 (2001).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Haisheng, Y. et al. The XAFS beamline of SSRF. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 05, 6–12 (2015).
Google ScholarÂ
Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Emery, A. A. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput DFT calculations of formation energy, stability and oxygen vacancy formation energy of ABO3 perovskites. Sci. Data 4, 170153 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ