Ding, L. et al. Perspective on oncogenic processes at the end of the beginning of cancer genomics. Cell 173, 305–320 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hutter, C. & Zenklusen, J. C. The Cancer Genome Atlas: creating lasting value beyond its data. Cell 173, 283–285 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ghandi, M. et al. Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Nature 569, 503–508 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, H. et al. The landscape of cancer cell line metabolism. Nat. Med. 25, 850–860 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Barretina, J. et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 483, 603–607 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Behan, F. M. et al. Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR–Cas9 screens. Nature 568, 511–516 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dempster, J. M. et al. Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR–Cas9 gene dependency data sets. Nat. Commun. 10, 5817 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Garnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483, 570–575 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Meyers, R. M. et al. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR–Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells. Nat. Genet. 49, 1779–1784 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rodriguez, H., Zenklusen, J. C., Staudt, L. M., Doroshow, J. H. & Lowy, D. R. The next horizon in precision oncology: proteogenomics to inform cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cell 184, 1661–1670 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Akbani, R. et al. Realizing the promise of reverse phase protein arrays for clinical, translational, and basic research: a workshop report: the RPPA (Reverse Phase Protein Array) society. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 1625–1643 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Akbani, R. et al. A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nat. Commun. 5, 3887 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, J. et al. Characterization of human cancer cell lines by reverse-phase protein arrays. Cancer Cell 31, 225–239 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhao, W. et al. Large-scale characterization of drug responses of clinically relevant proteins in cancer cell lines. Cancer Cell 38, 829–843 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bailey, M. H. et al. Comprehensive characterization of cancer driver genes and mutations. Cell 173, 371–385 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Berger, A. C. et al. A comprehensive pan-cancer molecular study of gynecologic and breast cancers. Cancer Cell 33, 690–705 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fang, Y. et al. Sequential therapy with PARP and WEE1 inhibitors minimizes toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Cancer Cell 35, 851–867 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Y. et al. A pan-cancer proteogenomic atlas of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations. Cancer Cell 31, 820–832 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, J. et al. Explore, visualize, and analyze functional cancer proteomic data using The Cancer Proteome Atlas. Cancer Res. 77, e51–e54 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, J. et al. TCPA: a resource for cancer functional proteomics data. Nat. Methods 10, 1046–1047 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Siwak, D. R., Li, J., Akbani, R., Liang, H. & Lu, Y. Analytical platforms 3: processing samples via the RPPA pipeline to generate large-scale data for clinical studies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1188, 113–147 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nusinow, D. P. et al. Quantitative proteomics of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Cell 180, 387–402 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Basu, A. et al. An interactive resource to identify cancer genetic and lineage dependencies targeted by small molecules. Cell 154, 1151–1161 (2013).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Corsello, S. M. et al. Discovering the anti-cancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling. Nat. Cancer 1, 235–248 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Iorio, F. et al. A landscape of pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer. Cell 166, 740–754 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jin, X. et al. A metastasis map of human cancer cell lines. Nature 588, 331–336 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, M. M. et al. TCPA v3.0: an integrative platform to explore the pan-cancer analysis of functional proteomic data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 18, S15–S25 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Thorsson, V. et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity 48, 812–830 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Frejno, M. et al. Proteome activity landscapes of tumor cell lines determine drug responses. Nat. Commun. 11, 3639 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hoadley, K. A. et al. Cell-of-origin patterns dominate the molecular classification of 10,000 tumors from 33 types of cancer. Cell 173, 291–304 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dempster, J. M. et al. Chronos: a cell population dynamics model of CRISPR experiments that improves inference of gene fitness effects. Genome Biol. 22, 343 (2021).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pacini, C. et al. Integrated cross-study datasets of genetic dependencies in cancer. Nat. Commun. 12, 1661 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Quintas-Cardama, A. & Cortes, J. Molecular biology of BCR–ABL1-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 113, 1619–1630 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pleasance, E. D. et al. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 463, 191–196 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, H. et al. Comprehensive assessment of computational algorithms in predicting cancer driver mutations. Genome Biol 21, 43 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ng, P. K. et al. Systematic functional annotation of somatic mutations in cancer. Cancer Cell 33, 450–462 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Davies, H. et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417, 949–954 (2002).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Menzer, C. et al. Targeted therapy in advanced melanoma with rare BRAF mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 3142–3151 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yaeger, R. & Corcoran, R. B. Targeting alterations in the Raf–MEK pathway. Cancer Discov. 9, 329–341 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lavoie, H., Gagnon, J. & Therrien, M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 607–632 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yao, Z. et al. BRAF mutants evade ERK-dependent feedback by different mechanisms that determine their sensitivity to pharmacologic inhibition. Cancer Cell 28, 370–383 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Negrao, M. V. et al. Molecular landscape of BRAF-mutant NSCLC reveals an association between clonality and driver mutations and identifies targetable non-V600 driver mutations. J. Thorac. Oncol. 15, 1611–1623 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, S. H. et al. Oncogenic BRAF deletions that function as homodimers and are sensitive to inhibition by Raf dimer inhibitor LY3009120. Cancer Discov. 6, 300–315 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Eisenhardt, A. E. et al. Functional characterization of a BRAF insertion mutant associated with pilocytic astrocytoma. Int. J. Cancer 129, 2297–2303 (2011).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
O’Neil, N. J., Bailey, M. L. & Hieter, P. Synthetic lethality and cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 613–623 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, J. S. et al. Synthetic lethality-mediated precision oncology via the tumor transcriptome. Cell 184, 2487–2502 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jaaks, P. et al. Effective drug combinations in breast, colon and pancreatic cancer cells. Nature 603, 166–173 (2022).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Abourehab, M. A. S., Alqahtani, A. M., Youssif, B. G. M. & Gouda, A. M.Globally approved EGFR inhibitors: insights into their syntheses, target kinases, biological activities, receptor interactions, and metabolism. Molecules 26, 6677 (2021).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sakamoto, K. M. & Frank, D. A. CREB in the pathophysiology of cancer: implications for targeting transcription factors for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 2583–2587 (2009).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Riccio, A., Ahn, S., Davenport, C. M., Blendy, J. A. & Ginty, D. D. Mediation by a CREB family transcription factor of NGF-dependent survival of sympathetic neurons. Science 286, 2358–2361 (1999).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Srinivasan, S. et al. Tobacco carcinogen-induced production of GM-CSF activates CREB to promote pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 78, 6146–6158 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Qin, Y. et al. Interfering MSN–NONO complex-activated CREB signaling serves as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw9960 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fares, J., Fares, M. Y., Khachfe, H. H., Salhab, H. A. & Fares, Y. Molecular principles of metastasis: a hallmark of cancer revisited. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 28 (2020).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Khan, I. & Steeg, P. S. Metastasis suppressors: functional pathways. Lab. Invest. 98, 198–210 (2017).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nguyen, D. T. et al. Pharos: collating protein information to shed light on the druggable genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D995–D1002 (2017).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dou, Y. et al. Proteogenomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Cell 180, 729–748 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gillette, M. A. et al. Proteogenomic characterization reveals therapeutic vulnerabilities in lung adenocarcinoma. Cell 182, 200–225 (2020).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vasaikar, S. et al. Proteogenomic analysis of human colon cancer reveals new therapeutic opportunities. Cell 177, 1035–1049 (2019).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tibes, R. et al. Reverse phase protein array: validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 2512–2521 (2006).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hennessy, B. T. et al. A technical assessment of the utility of reverse phase protein arrays for the study of the functional proteome in non-microdissected human breast cancers. Clin. Proteomics 6, 129–151 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, J. et al. Non-parametric quantification of protein lysate arrays. Bioinformatics 23, 1986–1994 (2007).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Neeley, E. S., Baggerly, K. A. & Kornblau, S. M. Surface adjustment of reverse phase protein arrays using positive control spots. Cancer Inform. 11, 77–86 (2012).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ju, Z. et al. Development of a robust classifier for quality control of reverse-phase protein arrays. Bioinformatics 31, 912–918 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. et al. Functional proteomics can define prognosis and predict pathologic complete response in patients with breast cancer. Clin. Proteomics 8, 11 (2011).ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wilkerson, M. D. & Hayes, D. N. ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics 26, 1572–1573 (2010).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M. & Brors, B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30, 2811–2812 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sanchez-Vega, F. et al. Oncogenic signaling pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell 173, 321–337 (2018).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dogruluk, T. et al. Identification of variant-specific functions of PIK3CA by rapid phenotyping of rare mutations. Cancer Res. 75, 5341–5354 (2015).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tsang, Y. H. et al. Functional annotation of rare gene aberration drivers of pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 7, 10500 (2016).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cheung, L. W. et al. Naturally occurring neomorphic PIK3R1 mutations activate the MAPK pathway, dictating therapeutic response to MAPK pathway inhibitors. Cancer Cell 26, 479–494 (2014).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liang, H. et al. Whole-exome sequencing combined with functional genomics reveals novel candidate driver cancer genes in endometrial cancer. Genome Res. 22, 2120–2129 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis 2nd edn (Springer, 2016).