Wright, P. A. Microporous Framework Solids. (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008).Bennett, T. D., Coudert, F.-X., James, S. L. & Cooper, A. I. The changing state of porous materials. Nat. Mater. 20, 1179–1187 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Davis, M. E. Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417, 813–821 (2002).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Samsudin, I. B., Jaenicke, S. & Chuah, G.-K. Zeolites in catalysis: sustainable synthesis and its impact on properties and applications. Catal. Sci. Technol. 12, 6024–6039 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Siegelman, R. L., Kim, E. J. & Long, J. R. Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations. Nat. Mater. 20, 1060–1072 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Adil, K. et al. Gas/vapour separation using ultra-microporous metal–organic frameworks: insights into the structure/separation relationship. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3402–3430 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li, B., Wen, H.-M., Zhou, W. & Chen, B. Porous metal–organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: what, how, and why? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3468–3479 (2014).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T., Lin, J.-B., Shimizu, G. K. & Rajendran, A. Separation of CO2 and N2 on a hydrophobic metal organic framework CALF-20. Chem. Eng. J. 442, 136263 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang, C., Liu, D. & Lin, W. Metal–organic frameworks as a tunable platform for designing functional molecular materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13222–13234 (2013).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Olorunyomi, J. F., Singh, R., Nasa, Z., Caruso, R. A. & Doherty, C. M. Micro-scaling metal-organic framework films through direct laser writing for chemical sensing. Adv. Sens. Res. 2, 2300051 (2023).Article
Google Scholar
Hendon, C. H., Rieth, A. J., Korzyński, M. D. & Dincă, M. Grand challenges and future opportunities for metal–organic frameworks. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 554–563 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
iXamena, F. X. L. & Gascon, J. Metal Organic Frameworks as Heterogeneous Catalysts. (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013).Olorunyomi, J. F. et al. Simultaneous enhancement of electrical conductivity and porosity of a metal–organic framework toward thermoelectric applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202403644 (2024).Katz, M. J. et al. Simple and compelling biomimetic metal–organic framework catalyst for the degradation of nerve agent simulants. Angew. Chem. 126, 507–511 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Horcajada, P. et al. Metal–organic frameworks as efficient materials for drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 5974–5978 (2006).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Horcajada, P. et al. Flexible porous metal-organic frameworks for a controlled drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6774–6780 (2008).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ma, X. et al. How defects impact the in vitro behavior of iron carboxylate MOF nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 36, 167–182 (2024).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Inukai, M. et al. Encapsulating mobile proton carriers into structural defects in coordination polymer crystals: high anhydrous proton conduction and fuel cell application. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8505–8511 (2016).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yusuf, V. F., Malek, N. I. & Kailasa, S. K. Review on metal-organic framework classification, synthetic approaches, and influencing factors: applications in energy, drug delivery, and wastewater treatment. ACS Omega 7, 44507–44531 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Slater, A. G. & Cooper, A. I. Function-led design of new porous materials. Science 348, aaa8075 (2015).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rowsell, J. L. C. & Yaghi, O. M. Metal–organic frameworks: a new class of porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 73, 3–14 (2004).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Fajula, F., Galarneau, A. & Renzo, F. D. Advanced porous materials: new developments and emerging trends. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 82, 227–239 (2005).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences et al. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (The National Academies Press, 2019). https://doi.org/10.17226/25303.Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S. & Rey, F. Zeolites in adsorption processes: state of the art and future prospects. Chem. Rev. 122, 17647–17695 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Parvulescu, A.-N. & Maurer, S. Toward sustainability in zeolite manufacturing: an industry perspective. Front. Chem. 10, 1050363 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Grimaldi, F., Ramirez, H., Lutz, C. & Lettieri, P. Intensified production of zeolite A: life cycle assessment of a continuous flow pilot plant and comparison with a conventional batch plant. J. Ind. Ecol. 25, 1617–1630 (2021).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Anh, L. K. & Long, N. Q. Ion-exchanged commercial-zeolites for O2 production and CO2 capture by swing adsorption technology: a brief review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1–14 (2024).Wu, Q., Ma, Y., Wang, S., Meng, X. & Xiao, F.-S. 110th Anniversary: sustainable synthesis of zeolites: from fundamental research to industrial production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 11653–11658 (2019). The paper summarises the sustainable pathways for the synthesis and industrial-scale production of zeolites while highlighting significant challenges and future direction.Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mallette, A. J., Seo, S. & Rimer, J. D. Synthesis strategies and design principles for nanosized and hierarchical zeolites. Nat. Synth. 1, 521–534 (2022). The paper highlights and details the synthetic pathways used in preparing zeolitic materials and the role of computational analysis that will facilitate a move away from trial and error approaches used in synthesising zeolites.Article
Google Scholar
Czuma, N., Casanova, I., Baran, P., Szczurowski, J. & Zarębska, K. CO2 sorption and regeneration properties of fly ash zeolites synthesized with the use of differentiated methods. Sci. Rep. 10, 1825 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cundy, C. S. & Cox, P. A. The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: history and development from the earliest days to the present time. Chem. Rev. 103, 663–702 (2003).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li, P., Ding, T., Liu, L. & Xiong, G. Investigation on phase transformation mechanism of zeolite NaY under alkaline hydrothermal conditions. Mater. Charact. 86, 221–231 (2013).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ren, B., Sun, J. & Bai, S. Phase transformation and morphology control of zeolite LZ-277 with alkaline media in Na2O–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O system. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 201, 228–233 (2015).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Do, M. H. et al. Zeolite growth by synergy between solution-mediated and solid-phase transformations. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 14360–14370 (2014).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
He, Y., Tang, S., Yin, S. & Li, S. Research progress on green synthesis of various high-purity zeolites from natural material-kaolin. J. Clean. Prod. 306, 127248 (2021).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ren, L. et al. Designed copper–amine complex as an efficient template for one-pot synthesis of Cu-SSZ-13 zeolite with excellent activity for selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3. Chem. Commun. 47, 9789–9791 (2011).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Seed-directed and organotemplate-free synthesis of TON zeolite. Catal. Today 226, 103–108 (2014).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Awala, H. et al. Template-free nanosized faujasite-type zeolites. Nat. Mater. 14, 447–451 (2015).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Tailor-made nanoseeds for the synthesis of zeolites with nanosized dimensions. Cryst. Growth Des. 23, 6450–6460 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Davis, M. E. Zeolites from a materials chemistry perspective. Chem. Mater. 26, 239–245 (2014).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bai, P. et al. Discovery of optimal zeolites for challenging separations and chemical transformations using predictive materials modeling. Nat. Commun. 6, 5912 (2015).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Machine learning-assisted crystal engineering of a zeolite. Nat. Commun. 14, 3152 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Roth, W. J. et al. A family of zeolites with controlled pore size prepared using a top-down method. Nat. Chem. 5, 628–633 (2013).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Corma, A., Rey, F., Rius, J., Sabater, M. J. & Valencia, S. Supramolecular self-assembled molecules as organic directing agent for synthesis of zeolites. Nature 431, 287–290 (2004).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Grand, J. et al. One-pot synthesis of silanol-free nanosized MFI zeolite. Nat. Mater. 16, 1010–1015 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Tong, C., Liu, Q., Han, R. & Liu, C. Intergrowth zeolites, synthesis, characterization, and catalysis. Chem. Rev. 123, 11664–11721 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Research progress on synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash and environmental applications. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 17, 149 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Utilization of NaP zeolite synthesized with different silicon species and NaAlO2 from coal fly ash for the adsorption of Rhodamine B. J. Hazard. Mater. 415, 125627 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kasneryk, V. et al. Vapour-phase-transport rearrangement technique for the synthesis of new zeolites. Nat. Commun. 10, 5129 (2019).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mendoza-Castro, M. J., Qie, Z., Fan, X., Linares, N. & García-Martínez, J. Tunable hybrid zeolites prepared by partial interconversion. Nat. Commun. 14, 1256 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fan, W., Zhang, X., Kang, Z., Liu, X. & Sun, D. Isoreticular chemistry within metal–organic frameworks for gas storage and separation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 443, 213968 (2021).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Jia, T., Gu, Y. & Li, F. Progress and potential of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for gas storage and separation: a review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10, 108300 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Recent advances in gas storage and separation using metal–organic frameworks. Mater. Today 21, 108–121 (2018).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sutton, A. L., Melag, L., Sadiq, M. M. & Hill, M. R. Capture, storage, and release of oxygen by metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202208305 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nazari, M. et al. Metal-organic-framework-coated optical fibers as light-triggered drug delivery vehicles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 3244–3249 (2016).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lawson, H. D., Walton, S. P. & Chan, C. Metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery: a design perspective. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 7004–7020 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moharramnejad, M. et al. MOF as nanoscale drug delivery devices: synthesis and recent progress in biomedical applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 81, 104285 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mallakpour, S., Nikkhoo, E. & Hussain, C. M. Application of MOF materials as drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and dermal treatment. Coord. Chem. Rev. 451, 214262 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li, D., Xu, H.-Q., Jiao, L. & Jiang, H.-L. Metal-organic frameworks for catalysis: state of the art, challenges, and opportunities. EnergyChem 1, 100005 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Liu, M., Wu, J. & Hou, H. Metal–organic framework (MOF)-based materials as heterogeneous catalysts for C−H bond activation. Chemistry 25, 2935–2948 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goetjen, T. A. et al. Metal–organic framework (MOF) materials as polymerization catalysts: a review and recent advances. Chem. Commun. 56, 10409–10418 (2020).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bergman, R. G. & Danheiser, R. L. Reproducibility in chemical research. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 12548–12549 (2016).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Baker, M. 1, 500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boström, H. L. B. et al. How reproducible is the synthesis of Zr–porphyrin metal–organic frameworks? An interlaboratory study. Adv. Mater. 36, 2304832 (2024). This paper describes the first-ever interlaboratory study of the synthetic reproducibility of two MOFs, the results highlight the need to systematically describe and account for synthetic variables not commonly reported.Article
Google Scholar
Park, J., Howe, J. D. & Sholl, D. S. How reproducible are isotherm measurements in metal–organic frameworks? Chem. Mater. 29, 10487–10495 (2017).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Han, R., Walton, K. S. & Sholl, D. S. Does chemical engineering research have a reproducibility problem? Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 10, 43–57 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rubio-Martinez, M. et al. New synthetic routes towards MOF production at scale. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3453–3480 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnson, T. et al. Improvements to the production of ZIF-94; a case study in MOF scale-up. Green. Chem. 21, 5665–5670 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
McDonald, T. M. et al. Capture of carbon dioxide from air and flue gas in the alkylamine-appended metal–organic framework mmen-Mg2 (dobpdc). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7056–7065 (2012).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Permyakova, A. et al. Synthesis optimization, shaping, and heat reallocation evaluation of the hydrophilic metal–organic framework MIL-160(Al). ChemSusChem. 10, 1419–1426 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lenzen, D. et al. Scalable green synthesis and full-scale test of the metal–organic framework CAU-10-H for use in adsorption-driven chillers. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705869 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Lin, J.-B. et al. A scalable metal-organic framework as a durable physisorbent for carbon dioxide capture. Science 374, 1464–1469 (2021). The commercial scale-up of CALF-20, an adsorbent for carbon flue gas capture, is remarkably significant in demonstrating the potential impact the scale-up of MOFs can have on industry and the broader community.Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nitta, C. Advanced Sorbent Materials with BASF for Carbon Capture Market. Preprint at svanteinc.com (2023).Chakraborty, D., Yurdusen, A., Mouchaham, G., Nouar, F. & Serre, C. Large-Scale Production of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202309089 (2023).Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Li, Z. & Garcia, H. Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 8134–8172 (2018).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sannes, D. K., Øien-Ødegaard, S., Aunan, E., Nova, A. & Olsbye, U. Quantification of linker defects in UiO-type metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 35, 3793–3800 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Yin, J. et al. Molecular identification and quantification of defect sites in metal-organic frameworks with NMR probe molecules. Nat. Commun. 13, 5112 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sadiq, M. M. et al. A pilot-scale demonstration of mobile direct air capture using metal-organic frameworks. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 4, 2000101 (2020).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang, T. C. et al. Surviving under pressure: the role of solvent, crystal size, and morphology during pelletization of metal–organic frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 52106–52112 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zheng, J. et al. Shaping of ultrahigh-loading MOF pellet with a strongly anti-tearing binder for gas separation and storage. Chem. Eng. J. 354, 1075–1082 (2018).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zadehahmadi, F. et al. Removal of metals from water using MOF-based composite adsorbents. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 9, 1305–1330 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ngo, T.-D. Introduction to Composite Materials. in (ed Ngo, T.-D.) Ch. 1 (IntechOpen, 2020) https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91285.Ulrich, K. T. & Eppinger, S. D. Product Design and Development. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2004).Sadiq, M. M., Rubio-Martinez, M., Zadehahmadi, F., Suzuki, K. & Hill, M. R. Magnetic framework composites for low concentration methane capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 6040–6047 (2018).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Melag, L. et al. Performance evaluation of CuBTC composites for room temperature oxygen storage. RSC Adv. 10, 40960–40968 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Melag, L. et al. Efficient delivery of oxygen via magnetic framework composites. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 3790–3796 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tao, Y., Huang, G., Li, H. & Hill, M. R. Magnetic metal–organic framework composites: solvent-free synthesis and regeneration driven by localized magnetic induction heat. ACS Sustain. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 13627–13632 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
He, B. et al. Continuous flow synthesis of a Zr magnetic framework composite for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chemistry 25, 13184–13188 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
He, B., Macreadie, L. K., Gardiner, J., Telfer, S. G. & Hill, M. R. In situ investigation of multicomponent MOF crystallization during rapid continuous flow synthesis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 54284–54293 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Magnetic induction framework synthesis: a general route to the controlled growth of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 29, 6186–6190 (2017).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sadiq, M. M. et al. Engineered porous nanocomposites that deliver remarkably low carbon capture energy costs. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 1, 100070 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Mahajan, R. & Koros, W. J. Factors controlling successful formation of mixed-matrix gas separation materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 2692–2696 (2000).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Wang, Z. & Zhao, D. Mixed matrix membranes for natural gas upgrading: current status and opportunities. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 4139–4169 (2018).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Thompson, J. A., Chapman, K. W., Koros, W. J., Jones, C. W. & Nair, S. Sonication-induced Ostwald ripening of ZIF-8 nanoparticles and formation of ZIF-8/polymer composite membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 158, 292–299 (2012).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. Highly scalable ZIF-based mixed-matrix hollow fiber membranes for advanced hydrocarbon separations. AIChE J. 60, 2625–2635 (2014).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Teesdale, J. J., Lee, M., Lu, R. & Smith, Z. P. Uncertainty in composite membranes: from defect engineering to film processing. Process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 830–840 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lau, C. H. et al. Ending aging in super glassy polymer membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5322–5326 (2014). This paper addresses the issue of polymer chain relaxation and aging in a permeable polymeric membrane while simultaneously achieving a drastic enhancement in gas permeabilities through the incorporation of PAF-1 particles.Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lau, C. H. et al. Gas-separation membranes loaded with porous aromatic frameworks that improve with age. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2669–2673 (2015).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Smith, S. J. D. et al. Physical aging in glassy mixed matrix membranes; tuning particle interaction for mechanically robust nanocomposite films. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 10627–10634 (2016).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. et al. Enhanced polymer crystallinity in mixed-matrix membranes induced by metal–organic framework nanosheets for efficient CO2 capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 43095–43103 (2018).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith, S. J. D. et al. Highly permeable thermally rearranged mixed matrix membranes (TR-MMM). J. Memb. Sci. 585, 260–270 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Hou, R. et al. Greatly enhanced gas selectivity in mixed-matrix membranes through size-controlled hyper-cross-linked polymer additives. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 13773–13782 (2020).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cheng, X. et al. Building additional passageways in polyamide membranes with hydrostable metal organic frameworks to recycle and remove organic solutes from various solvents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 38877–38886 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Husain, S. & Koros, W. J. Mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes made with modified HSSZ-13 zeolite in polyetherimide polymer matrix for gas separation. J. Memb. Sci. 288, 195–207 (2007).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Dai, Y., Johnson, J. R., Karvan, O., Sholl, D. S. & Koros, W. J. Ultem®/ZIF-8 mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes for CO2/N2. Sep. J. Memb. Sci. 401–402, 76–82 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Ismail, A. F., Kusworo, T. D. & Mustafa, A. Enhanced gas permeation performance of polyethersulfone mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes using novel Dynasylan Ameo silane agent. J. Memb. Sci. 319, 306–312 (2008).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mahdavi, H., Smith, S. J. D., Mulet, X. & Hill, M. R. Practical considerations in the design and use of porous liquids. Mater. Horiz. 9, 1577–1601 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mahdavi, H. et al. Accelerated systematic investigation of solvents suitability for type II/III porous liquids. ACS. Mater. Lett. 5, 549–557 (2023).CAS
Google Scholar
Mahdavi, H. et al. Underlying solvent-based factors that influence permanent porosity in porous liquids. Nano Res. 15, 3533–3538 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mahdavi, H. et al. Underlying polar and nonpolar modification MOF-based factors that influence permanent porosity in porous liquids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 23392–23399 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mahdavi, H., Sadiq, M. M., Smith, S. J. D., Mulet, X. & Hill, M. R. Underlying potential evaluation of the real-process applications of magnetic porous liquids. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 16846–16853 (2023). The paper introduces a novel porous liquid with high regeneration ability, ensuring reusability, and high productivity while exhibiting one of the lowest regeneration energies observed for any adsorbent.Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Smith, S. J. D. et al. Porous solid inspired hyper-crosslinked polymer liquids with highly efficient regeneration for gas purification. Sci. China Mater. 65, 1937–1942 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Weidenthaler, C. Pitfalls in the characterization of nanoporous and nanosized materials. Nanoscale 3, 792–810 (2011).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Osterrieth, J. W. M. et al. How reproducible are surface areas calculated from the BET equation? Adv. Mater. 34, e2201502 (2022). The paper introduces a software called “BET surface identification” (BETSI), which expands on the well-known Rouquerol criteria and makes an unambiguous BET area assignment possible.Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rouquerol, J., Llewellyn, P. & Rouquerol, F. Is the BET equation applicable to microporous adsorbents. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 160, 49–56 (2007).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Thommes, M. et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87, 1051–1069 (2015).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rouquerol, J., Rouquerol, F., Llewellyn, P., Maurin, G. & Sing, K. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology and Applications. (Academic Press, 2013).De, A., Maliuta, M., Senkovska, I. & Kaskel, S. The dilemma of reproducibility of gating isotherms for flexible MOFs. Langmuir 38, 14073–14083 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bingel, L. W., Chen, A., Agrawal, M. & Sholl, D. S. Experimentally verified alcohol adsorption isotherms in nanoporous materials from literature meta-analysis. J. Chem. Eng. Data 65, 4970–4979 (2020).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Evans, J. D., Bon, V., Senkovska, I. & Kaskel, S. A universal standard archive file for adsorption data. Langmuir 37, 4222–4226 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ongari, D., Talirz, L., Jablonka, K. M., Siderius, D. W. & Smit, B. Data-driven matching of experimental crystal structures and gas adsorption isotherms of metal–organic frameworks. J. Chem. Eng. Data 67, 1743–1756 (2022).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ongari, D., Yakutovich, A. V., Talirz, L. & Smit, B. Building a consistent and reproducible database for adsorption evaluation in covalent–organic frameworks. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1663–1675 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bobbitt, N. S. et al. MOFX-DB: an online database of computational adsorption data for nanoporous materials. J. Chem. Eng. Data 68, 483–498 (2023).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bae, Y.-S., Yazaydin, A. O. & Snurr, R. Q. Evaluation of the BET method for determining surface areas of MOFs and zeolites that contain ultra-micropores. Langmuir 26, 5475–5483 (2010).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ambroz, F., Macdonald, T. J., Martis, V. & Parkin, I. P. Evaluation of the BET Theory for the characterization of meso and microporous MOFs. Small Methods 2, 1800173 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Cai, X. et al. A collection of more than 900 gas mixture adsorption experiments in porous materials from literature meta-analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 639–651 (2021).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kamat, P. V. Absolute, arbitrary, relative, or normalized scale? How to get the scale right. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2005–2006 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Agrawal, M., Han, R., Herath, D. & Sholl, D. S. Does repeat synthesis in materials chemistry obey a power law? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 877–882 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Broom, D. P. & Hirscher, M. Improving reproducibility in hydrogen storage material research. ChemPhysChem. 22, 2141–2157 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chung, Y. G. et al. Advances, updates, and analytics for the computation-ready, experimental metal–organic framework database: CoRE MOF 2019. J. Chem. Eng. Data 64, 5985–5998 (2019).Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Moghadam, P. Z. et al. Development of a Cambridge Structural Database Subset: a collection of metal–organic frameworks for past, present, and future. Chem. Mater. 29, 2618–2625 (2017). This paper reports the generation and characterization of a comprehensive collection of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) curated by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), and this collection, updated regularly, provides a unique resource for researchers working with porous materials worldwide.Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Orhan, I. B., Le, T. C., Babarao, R. & Thornton, A. W. Accelerating the prediction of CO2 capture at low partial pressures in metal-organic frameworks using new machine learning descriptors. Commun. Chem. 6, 214 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Orhan, I. B., Daglar, H., Keskin, S., Le, T. C. & Babarao, R. Prediction of O2/N2 selectivity in metal–organic frameworks via high-throughput computational screening and machine learning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 736–749 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M. & Smit, B. Big-data science in porous materials: materials genomics and machine learning. Chem. Rev. 120, 8066–8129 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yasuda, T., Ookawara, S., Yoshikawa, S. & Matsumoto, H. Machine learning and data-driven characterization framework for porous materials: permeability prediction and channeling defect detection. Chem. Eng. J. 420, 130069 (2021).Article
CAS
Google Scholar