Busch, M. et al. Beyond the top of the volcano? – A unified approach to electrocatalytic oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution. Nano Energy 29, 126–135 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Abb, M. J. S., Weber, T., Glatthaar, L. & Over, H. Growth of ultrathin single-crystalline IrO2(110) films on a TiO2(110) single crystal. Langmuir 35, 7720–7726 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Reiser, C., Keßler, P., Kamp, M., Jovic, V. & Moser, S. Specific capacitance of RuO2(110) depends sensitively on surface order. J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 3682–3688 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Weber, T. et al. Operando stability studies of ultrathin single-crystalline IrO2(110) films under acidic oxygen evolution reaction conditions. ACS Catal. 11, 12651–12660 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kuo, D.-Y. et al. Influence of surface adsorption on the oxygen evolution reaction on IrO2(110). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3473–3479 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kuo, D.-Y. et al. Measurements of oxygen electroadsorption energies and oxygen evolution reaction on RuO2(110): a discussion of the sabatier principle and its role in electrocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17597–17605 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Keilbart, N., Okada, Y. & Dabo, I. Probing the pseudocapacitance and energy-storage performance of RuO2 facets from first principles. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 085405 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Karlberg, G. S. et al. Cyclic voltammograms for H on Pt(111) and Pt(100) from first principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 126101 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nong, H. N. et al. Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nature 587, 408–413 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pfeifer, V. et al. Reactive oxygen species in iridium-based OER catalysts. Chem. Sci. 7, 6791–6795 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hrbek, T., Kús, P., Rodriguez, M. G., Matolin, V. & MatolÃnová, I. Operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy cell for water electrolysis: a complete picture of iridium electronic structure during oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 57, 187–197 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pedersen, A. F. et al. Operando XAS study of the surface oxidation state on a monolayer IrOx on RuOx and Ru oxide based nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acidic media. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 878–887 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Che, Q. et al. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy of LaFeO3 and LaFeO3/LaNiO3 thin films in the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 128, 5515–5523 (2024).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Axnanda, S. et al. Using ‘tender’ X-ray ambient pressure X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy as a direct probe of solid-liquid interface. Sci. Rep. 5, 9788 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Favaro, M. et al. Elucidating the alkaline oxygen evolution reaction mechanism on platinum. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11634–11643 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Favaro, M. et al. Unravelling the electrochemical double layer by direct probing of the solid/liquid interface. Nat. Commun. 7, 12695 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Aydogan Gokturk, P. et al. The Donnan potential revealed. Nat. Commun. 13, 5880 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lichterman, M. F. et al. Direct observation of the energetics at a semiconductor/liquid junction by operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2409–2416 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fenter, P. et al. Electrical double-layer structure at the rutile–water interface as observed in situ with small-period X-ray standing waves. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 225, 154–165 (2000).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rao, R. R. et al. Towards identifying the active sites on RuO2(110) in catalyzing oxygen evolution. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2626–2637 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Qian, J., Baskin, A., Liu, Z., Prendergast, D. & Crumlin, E. J. Addressing the sensitivity of signals from solid/liquid ambient pressure XPS (APXPS) measurement. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 044709 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lyle, H., Singh, S., Paolino, M., Vinogradov, I. & Cuk, T. The electron-transfer intermediates of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) as polarons by in situ spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 24984–25002 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vinogradov, I. et al. Free energy difference to create the M-OH* intermediate of the oxygen evolution reaction by time-resolved optical spectroscopy. Nat. Mater. 21, 88–94 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mesa, C. A. et al. Multihole water oxidation catalysis on haematite photoanodes revealed by operando spectroelectrochemistry and DFT. Nat. Chem. 12, 82–89 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Righi, G. et al. On the origin of multihole oxygen evolution in haematite photoanodes. Nat. Catal. 5, 888–899 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Risch, M. et al. Water oxidation by amorphous cobalt-based oxides: in situ tracking of redox transitions and mode of catalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 661–674 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Reticcioli, M., Diebold, U. & Franchini, C. Modeling polarons in density functional theory: lessons learned from TiO2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 34, 204006 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
De Lile, J. R., Bahadoran, A., Zhou, S. & Zhang, J. Polaron in TiO2 from first-principles: a review. Adv. Theory Simul. 5, 2100244 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Cheng, J., VandeVondele, J. & Sprik, M. Identifying trapped electronic holes at the aqueous TiO2 interface. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 5437–5444 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, Y.-F. & Selloni, A. Pathway of photocatalytic oxygen evolution on aqueous TiO2 anatase and insights into the different activities of anatase and rutile. ACS Catal. 6, 4769–4774 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, D., Sheng, T., Chen, J., Wang, H.-F. & Hu, P. Identifying the key obstacle in photocatalytic oxygen evolution on rutile TiO2. Nat. Catal. 1, 291–299 (2018).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dabo, I., Kozinsky, B., Singh-Miller, N. E. & Marzari, N. Electrostatics in periodic boundary conditions and real-space corrections. Phys. Rev. B 77, 115139 (2008).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Thatribud, A. Electronic and optical properties of TiO2 by first-principle calculation (DFT-GW and BSE). Mater. Res. Express 6, 095021 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Janotti, A., Varley, J. B., Choi, M. & Van de Walle, C. G. Vacancies and small polarons in SrTiO3.Phys. Rev. B 90, 085202 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Herlihy, D. M. et al. Detecting the oxyl radical of photocatalytic water oxidation at an n-SrTiO3/aqueous interface through its subsurface vibration. Nat. Chem. 8, 549–555 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, M., de Respinis, M. & Frei, H. Time-resolved observations of water oxidation intermediates on a cobalt oxide nanoparticle catalyst. Nat. Chem. 6, 362–367 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, M. & Frei, H. Water oxidation mechanisms of metal oxide catalysts by vibrational spectroscopy of transient intermediates. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 68, 209–231 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zandi, O. & Hamann, T. W. Determination of photoelectrochemical water oxidation intermediates on haematite electrode surfaces using operando infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 8, 778–783 (2016).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hörmann, N. G., Andreussi, O. & Marzari, N. Grand canonical simulations of electrochemical interfaces in implicit solvation models. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 041730 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Andreussi, O., Dabo, I. & Marzari, N. Revised self-consistent continuum solvation in electronic-structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 064102 (2012).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sundararaman, R., Goddard, W. A. III & Arias, T. A. Grand canonical electronic density-functional theory: algorithms and applications to electrochemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 114104 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Gonella, G. et al. Water at charged interfaces. Nat. Rev. Chem. 5, 466–485 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Deng, B. et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, B. W. J., Zhang, X. & Zhang, J. Accelerating explicit solvent models of heterogeneous catalysts with machine learning interatomic potentials. Chem. Sci. 14, 8338–8354 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, X. et al. The formation time of Ti–O• and Ti–O•–Ti radicals at the n-SrTiO3/aqueous interface during photocatalytic water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1830–1841 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Singh, S. et al. Coherent acoustic interferometry during the photodriven oxygen evolution reaction associates strain fields with the reactive oxygen intermediate (Ti–OH*). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 15984–15997 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chen, X., Aschaffenburg, D. J. & Cuk, T. Selecting between two transition states by which water oxidation intermediates decay on an oxide surface. Nat. Catal. 2, 820–827 (2019).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sit, P. H. L., Cococcioni, M. & Marzari, N. Realistic quantitative descriptions of electron transfer reactions: diabatic free-energy surfaces from first-principles molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 028303 (2006).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Marcus, R. A. Electrostatic free energy and other properties of states having nonequilibrium polarization. I. J. Chem. Phys. 24, 979–989 (2004).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fraggedakis, D. et al. Theory of coupled ion-electron transfer kinetics. Electrochim. Acta 367, 137432 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jonas, D. M. Two-dimensional femtosecond spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 54, 425–463 (2003).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bredenbeck, J., Helbing, J., Kolano, C. & Hamm, P. Ultrafast 2D-IR spectroscopy of transient species. ChemPhysChem 8, 1747–1756 (2007).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ma, Y. et al. Titanium dioxide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic fuel generations. Chem. Rev. 114, 9987–10043 (2014).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Mucha, N. R. et al. High-performance titanium oxynitride thin films for electrocatalytic water oxidation. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 8366–8374 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Roy, M. et al. Modulation of structural, electronic, and optical properties of titanium nitride thin films by regulated in situ oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 4733–4742 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Neppl, S. & Gessner, O. Time-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques for the study of interfacial charge dynamics. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 200, 64–77 (2015).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bergmann, U. et al. Using X-ray free-electron lasers for spectroscopy of molecular catalysts and metalloenzymes. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 264–282 (2021).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Husek, J., Cirri, A., Biswas, S. & Baker, L. R. Surface electron dynamics in hematite (α-Fe2O3): correlation between ultrafast surface electron trapping and small polaron formation. Chem. Sci. 8, 8170–8178 (2017).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wagstaffe, M. et al. Photoinduced dynamics at the TiO2(101) interface.Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 108001 (2023).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, B., Kuo, D.-Y., Paik, H., Schlom, D. G. & Suntivich, J. Enthalpy and entropy of oxygen electroadsorption on RuO2(110) in alkaline media. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 094704 (2020).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ